1 / 21

Mini-Skills: Clinical Problem Solving Counseling in the Schools

Mini-Skills: Clinical Problem Solving Counseling in the Schools. Texas Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference Norma S. Guerra, PhD NCSP, LSSP. Agenda. Overview of clinical problem solving theoretical framework LIBRE Model Ground rules Exercise

michaelramirez
Download Presentation

Mini-Skills: Clinical Problem Solving Counseling in the Schools

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mini-Skills: Clinical Problem Solving Counseling in the Schools Texas Association of School Psychologists Annual Conference Norma S. Guerra, PhD NCSP, LSSP

  2. Agenda • Overview of clinical problem solving theoretical framework • LIBRE Model • Ground rules • Exercise • Problem solving as a clinical tool • Data units • Scoring and Implications • Intervention and Services

  3. Social Cognitive Theory • Albert Bandura – Social Learning Theory - People learn by observing other people’s actions. • Active agent in life - beliefs, self-perceptions, and expectations • Social Cognitive Theory includes person/cognition, behavior and environment as a reciprocal interaction

  4. The Focus is on the Individual • Bandura & Schunk (1981) explain competence and efficacy as learned skills • Bandura (1986) further details the dynamic self to explain that we are not observers of our own lives • Self-agency involves core properties of: • Intentionality • Forethought • Self-reactiveness • Self-reflection (Bandura, 2006)

  5. Self-Efficacy • “Self-efficacy is the belief in one’s capabilities to organize and execute the courses of action required to manage prospective situations.” (Bandura, 1986) • What does self-efficacy do? • The choices we make • The effort we put forth • How long we persist when difficulty arises • How we feel

  6. Interactive Relation Outcomes/ Behaviors Mediating Mechanism: Beliefs Goal Progress Motivation Self-Influences/ Personal Social Influences/ Environmental Goals Self-Efficacy Outcome Expectations Attributions Models Instruction Feedback

  7. MASTERYEXPERIENCES – (Most powerful) Successful experiences VICARIOUSEXPERIENCES – Accomplishments modeled by someone else SOCIALPERSUASION – “pep talk” or encouragement AROUSAL – Physical and psychological reactions – excited, tense Sources of Self-Efficacy

  8. Goal Orientation • Factors that Affect Change • Schunk and Zimmerman - increased capacity to process information, use strategies, and meet a defined goal • Goal orientation involves an individual’s engagement in achieving a focal activity • Self-efficacy - Past experience, perception and good consequences heightens motivation • Goal Setting - more likely to model behaviors that will help them attain goals

  9. LIBRE Model • Multi-faceted meta-cognitive social activity designed to slow down the problem solving process • There are five prompted steps that are based on social cognitive and goal orientation theory to address initial and sustained attention • The exchange begins with an invitation, ground rules and the five open-ended questions

  10. LIBRE Model Ground Rules Respect – all persons involved in problem solving must be upheld in a position of esteem understanding that there is a vulnerability involved in disclosing challenge Client Safety – boundaries must be maintained Safe Environment – ensure a comfortable private setting Confidentiality - ensured within defined parameters

  11. Exercise

  12. LIBRE Model • L – to listen • I – to identify your focus/concern/challenge • B – to brainstorm • R – to reality test options • E – to encourage Each has as its goal the monitoring of investment

  13. Using the LIBRE Model as a Clinical Tool • Erikson (1968) explains that identity development involves an internal (as the person becomes aware of self) and an external (in relationship to others) resolution of crisis • It is these crisis points and the development of resolution that define who we are, what we want, and provide opportunity for development

  14. LIBRE Model • Designed as a critical thinking template to facilitate problem solving/decision-making • The goal is to affirm, empower and teach self-efficacy skills and management needed to manage the processing of concerns and problems as they arise

  15. Data Units • The student’s words are the only data collected • Only the student’s words are analyzed for social context (e.g., what you are thinking, what you are feeling, how you express what is occurring within your environment), goal orientation (e.g., within your control, detailed) and self-regulated attentiveness • The observed attentiveness: initial and sustained attention is used to define engagement styles

  16. Intervention and Services

  17. Engagement Style Scoring and Implications

  18. Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs Motivational Investment Levels

  19. Questions & Answers • When do I use it? • Can I use it in combination with other interventions? • Are there limits to the populations that it can be used with?

  20. Thank you • Norma S. Guerra, PhD NSCP, LSSP Norma.Guerra@utsa.edu

More Related