120 likes | 129 Views
Explore King County's surprising findings on smoking disparities compared to other metro areas, revealing advantages and challenges in different populations. Learn about methodology, take-home messages, current initiatives, and contact for advice.
E N D
Using Local Health Data to Identify Disparities in King County Analysis: Eva Wong, Mike Smyser Presenter: Susan Kinne Assessment, Policy Development and Evaluation Unit Public Health-Seattle & King County
Background(apologies for acronyms) • PHSKC applied for ARRA health promotion grants • King County smoking rates very low: so why fund us? • Looked at disparities in smoking compared to those of other metro counties • Surprising findings! • Unfinished work; start of the discussion
Methodology • Used Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance Survey (BRFSS) data for the county • Examined smoking rates by race and ethnicity (African/American non-Hispanic vs White non-Hispanic) • Computed rate ratios: 1 rate divided by another • More advantaged group is the denominator or “reference group”
Take-home messages: compared to other large counties… • King County’s low overall smoking rates are driven by its relatively advantaged population • Majority white, well-off, highly educated population is smoking less • Minority non-white population has very different profile • All information supports focus on disadvantaged populations • King County was funded by ARRA
What We’re Doing Now • Running different disparity indicators on a few variables • Identifying underlying philosophical differences among indicators • Deciding which disparity indicators suit our needs
Advice and opinions appreciated Susan.kinne@kingcounty.gov