1 / 28

Probability Paradoxes: A Tale of Two Brothers

Explore the surprising outcomes of competitive probabilities between two brothers, revealing fascinating patterns and insights. Delve into random walks, intriguing theorems, paradoxes, and unexpected results in the world of probability. Unravel complex concepts and enjoy the journey of discovery in this engaging lecture.

Download Presentation

Probability Paradoxes: A Tale of Two Brothers

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 10 Powerful Ideas Lecture 23 Paradoxes and Payoffs of Probability

  2. A Tale of Two Brothers Carl and Hal (cburch@cs.cmu.edu, hburch@cs.cmu.edu). As competitive as they are similar. Familiar with the sad story of Isaac and Gottfried, these two brothers were determined to avoid a fluke outcome. So instead of competing once a year, they competed once an hour! (This is 876,600 events!) Each brother wins any event with probability 1/2, independent of any other events. Amazingly, Hal was ahead for the last 50 years of his life! Should we have expected this?

  3. A Random Walk Let xkdenote the difference in victories after k events. We can view x0, x1, x2, … , xnas a “random walk” that depends on the outcomes of the individual events.

  4. Theorem: The number of sequences in which xk is never negative is equal to the number that start and end at 0, for even n.

  5. Proof: Put the two sets in one-to-one and onto correspondence.

  6. Lemma: Suppose that Y is an integer random variable in [0,m] such that Then Proof:

  7. Lemma: For odd n,the number of sequences that last touch 0 at position i is equal to the number that last touch 0 at position n-i-1. Proof: Put these sets in one-to-one and onto correspondence.

  8. Theorem: Let Y be the length of the longest suffix that does not touch 0. For odd n, Proof: Y is a random variable in the range [0,n-1]. By previous lemma,

  9. A seemingly contradictory observation: The expected length of the final suffix that does not touch 0 is (n-1)/2, but the expected number of times the sequence touches 0 in the last n/2 steps is

  10. Berthold’s Triangle The number of sequences with k1’s and n-k0’s in which the number of 1’s is greater than or equal to the number of 0’s in every prefix. Examples: 111 110 101

  11. 0 0 0 5 4 1 0 0 0 5 9 5 1 0 0 0 0 14 14 6 1 Notice that the n’th row sums to 1 0 1 0 1 1 0 0 2 1 0 0 2 3 1

  12. Theorem: Proof: By inductionon n. Base cases: Inductive step:

  13. Another strange fact… Let Z be the number of steps before the sequence returns to 0. Let Z’ be the number of steps before the sequence drops below 0. This looks like trouble! E[Z’] isn’t finite!

  14. The moral of this story is... When it comes to expectations, you never know what to expect!

More Related