350 likes | 503 Views
ブルックヘブンにおけるHBD開発とGEM基礎特性について. 12/12/09 MPGD 研究会 @ 神戸大学. Yusuke Komatsu A B. Az moun B , C. Woody B , K. Ozawa A. University of Tokyo A ,Brook Haven National Lab. B. Outline. HBD for PHENIX Results from the last year run
E N D
ブルックヘブンにおけるHBD開発とGEM基礎特性についてブルックヘブンにおけるHBD開発とGEM基礎特性について 12/12/09 MPGD研究会@神戸大学 Yusuke KomatsuA B. AzmounB, C. WoodyB, K. OzawaA University of TokyoA ,Brook Haven National Lab.B
Outline • HBD for PHENIX • Results from the last year run • Gain - gas fraction & VGEM dependence (ArCF4) • Gain - Time dependence with Tech-Etch GEM • Comparison between Tech Etch and CERN • Time dependence as a function of the amount of water
HadronBlind Detector for PHENIX • Windowless Cherenkov light detector • Dalitzrejector for measurements of low–mass e+ e- pairs.(me+ e- ≤ 1GeV) • Dalitz rejection with opening angle under “no” magnetic field • Improve S/B ratio ~2 orders(goal) in massspectrum! Signal: ex) φ→ e+ e- BG: π0→ e+ e- γ γ → e+ e- PHENIX 200GeV Au+Au Run4(before install HBD) arXiv:0706.3034
HBD Concept CF4 : UV Ecutoff =11.5eV →λ=108nm + CsI : limit from QE →λ=200nm Charged particle(γ<γth) e-(+) Mesh CF4 Reverse bias e- Cherenkov light pe Sensitive region of wave lengh is 108< λ[nm] <200 CsI GEM (as an electron multiplication) Forward bias ~40 photoelectrons /e-(+) Readout pad CsI photocathode is coated on the top GEM. CF4 both for Cherenkov radiator and electron multiplication gas .
Run9 View & performance of HBD few pe Hadron blind e+ e- 55 cm q Pair Opening Angle 5 cm 22 pe Single electron signal Triple GEM detectors (10 panels per side) Gas & HV
Objective ◎Base measurements of GEM for further upgrades • Improved gas mixture Ar & CF4 have all most 100% transmittance in the sensitive wave lengh region. Ar mixed gas can reduce the operation voltage. -gain measurement in ArCF4 Green Ar Red CF4
Objective • Time dependence of gain and H2O contamination Used Tech-Etch GEM. They are said to have different property from CERN GEM in time dependence of gain. And H2O ppm effects gain. -gain vs time (Tech-Etch) -gain vs time changing H2O ppm (Tech-Etch)
Measurements of gain vs VGEMin ArCF4 • Measured triple GEM gain vs V across GEM(VGEM) with Fe55 . • Dependence of the ArCF4 ratio. GEM made byCERN Pitch : 120μm Hole size(outer): 80μm (Inner ): 50μm Fe55 Mesh DG 4.09 mm , 1 kV/cm VGEM 1.59 mm , 2.5 kV/cm TG1 GEM TG2 1.57 mm , 3 kV/cm IG 1.61 mm , 3.5 kV/cm Readout Pad
GEM CERN-segmented Each resistor is 10MΩ. One side is composed of 4 segments.
GEM chamber Electrodes for GEM H2O: <100ppm
ArCF4 gain vs VGEM 20/80 Green line represents the effective voltage for mixed gas to obtain the same signal strength as pure CF4. Results show ArCF4 has enough gain.
Gain vs time measurement:ArCO270/30 (Tech-Etch) • Measured time dependency of gain in ArCO2 70/30. • Used another GEM series. They were made by Tech-Etch. • Insulator CERN: apical TE:E-type Kapton Pitch : 120μm Hole size(outer): 80μm (Inner ): 50μm Double conical
Relative gain Gain of Tech-Etch GEM increased by ~3.5 times in 2.5 hrs.
Gain vs VGEM in plateau Gain was extremely high compared to CERN-segmented(gain abs.=1342@340V, ArCO2 70/30).
Gain curve :TE changing H2O & CERN C-C-C 330~130 ppm 28.4% TE ~1100ppm 1100ppm 38.1% C-C-TE 330~140ppm 23% TE ~250ppm 31.1% TE ~50 ppm 36%increase When reset charge up, flow Ar+H2O at ~2 l/min for 10 min. Tech-Etch GEM need longer time to reach gain saturation than CERN GEM. H2O can decrease a saturation time,however could not see such effects .
Summary • Measured gain vs VGEMin ArCF4. • Energy resolution did not depend on gain but a kind of gas mixture. • Gain changed according to time ~3.5times eventually when used Tech-Etch GEM. • About Tech-Etch GEM, water content in the chamber changed the gain , but did not the time to reach a saturated point of gain.
Requirements for HBD Hadron blindness and high sesitivity to a small number of photoelectrons as signal. • Very high e-(+) efficiency • Double hit resolution at least 90% when opening angle is small. ~104 multiplication factor Use GEM and CsI photocathode. Use analog information about charge. Need photo electrons as many as possible. pure CF4 bandwidth:6~11.5eV Respond to a large bandwidth of Cherenkov light .
ArCO2 gain vs VGEM 60/40
Results: ArCO2 Energy resolution Consistent with a reference thesys NIM A523(2004)345-354. ~22%.
Gain curve changing H2O ppm (TE GEM) 38.1% increase ~1100 ppm 31.1% ~250ppm ~50 ppm 36.0% Tech-Etch GEM need longer time to reach gain saturation than CERN GEM. H2O can decrease a saturation time,however could not see such effects .
QE of CsI photocathode From Craig’s slide.
But GEM had tripped on the way. • “11/12 9:36 all GEM tripped.Ramped up 350V again. There seems no damage.” Kept on measurement. Gain still increased.
Results: Time dependency of gain ArCO2 70/30,VGEM =350V
Electron pairs – Central Arms (200 GeV pp) I.Ravinovich