130 likes | 277 Views
www.westcoastenergy.com. A Perspective on the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Project. C. Bruce Scott Director, Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Initiative. October 19, 2001. B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt. 1. ALASKA. Westcoast. Pipeline. CANADA. PNG. Centra . Gas B.C. Alliance.
E N D
www.westcoastenergy.com A Perspective on the Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Project C. Bruce Scott Director, Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Initiative October 19, 2001 B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt 1
ALASKA Westcoast Pipeline CANADA PNG Centra Gas B.C. Alliance Maritimes Empire Union Gas AGT Vector U.S.A. Texas Eastern East Tenn Gulfstream Continental Energy MarketWestcoast Energy - Duke Energy • Duke Energy Acquisition Proposal • Strong North American Position • Good for Westcoast Shareholders and Energy Development • Expected Closure by First Quarter 2002 B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Demand for Natural Gas North American Natural Gas Demand The market opportunity for Arctic gas, coalbed methane, offshore supplies and new LNG import terminals Supply from Existing Basins • Gas production from existing basins will not keep pace with demand • Long-term prices will increase to encourage new supply development B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Mackenzie Delta+1 Bcf/d - 2008/2009? Prudhoe Bay+2.4 Bcf/d - 2008/2009? Scotian Shelf+0.7 Bcf/d - 2005+0.8 Bcf/d - 2010 Burgos Basin???? Deepwater Gulf+2 Bcf/d - 2005 Frontier Supply Responses • Strong long-term gas prices support frontier supply development • North America needs both Arctic gas supplies as soon as possible B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Mackenzie Valley Pipeline Alaska Highway Pipeline The Routing Debate Prudhoe Bay Mackenzie Delta Inuvik Fairbanks Anchorage Norman Wells Whitehorse Yellowknife Fort Liard Fort Nelson Boundary Lake Fort St. John • Two pipelines are required for optimum development of Arctic gas • All jurisdictions will gain benefits from a two-pipeline model B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Capital Cost Northern Gas Pipeline Development Routing Comparisons 14 12 10 8 Capital Cost (Billion US$) 6 4 MV - Mackenzie Valley ANGTS - Alaska OTT - Over-the-Top (Prudhoe Bay / Mackenzie Delta) 2 0 MV ANGTS ANGTS + MV OTT/MV Initial Ultimate • ANGTS enjoys construction cost advantages due to year round access provided by the Alaska Highway • Over-the-Top route has major cost adders due to: • Short and uncertain construction season • Twin lines in the Beaufort Sea section are needed for reliability B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Mackenzie Valley PipelineProducers’ Development Concept • Focus on onshore gas • Route through Mackenzie Valley • Parallel oil pipeline right-of-way • Use proven technology • Initially transport 0.8 bcf per day • Provide access to explorers • Allow for extensions/expansions Alaska Nunavut Northwest Territories Yukon 1,025 miles 30” diameter 2,050 psig US$ 2.7-3.1 billion Alberta B.C. • Standalone pipeline is lowest cost, quickest way to market for Mackenzie Delta gas B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Mackenzie Valley PipelineStatus Commentary • Establishing interdependent business relationships • Gaining broad acceptance from all communities • Harmonizing regulatory/environmental assessment process • Preparing regulatory filing • Securing markets for gas and pipeline capacity • Formulating sound technical and commercial models • Developing programs for training northern people • Firming up adequate onshore gas reserves • Resolving routing debate and determining development timing • Developing downstream pipelines in market-based manner • Proponents must aggressively address many near-term challenges B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
The Energy Spine of Canada’s Western Arctic • Mackenzie Valley gas pipeline • Gas gathering and processing • Gathering lines from other areas • Laterals to serve communities • Liquids extraction/handling • Power generation and distribution • Downstream pipeline expansions • Gas gathering and processing Alaska • Gathering lines from other areas Nunavut • Laterals to serve communities Northwest Territories • Liquids extraction/handling Yukon • Power generation and distribution Alberta • Downstream pipeline expansions B.C. • The pipeline will lead to further development of energy infrastructure B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
South of 60o Takeaway Capacities • Pipeline Options: • TransCanada • Alliance • Foothills / ANG / PGT • Foothills / Northern Border • Westcoast / Williams • New greenfield • Issues: • Western Canada supply • Market pull • Tolling structures • Producer netbacks • Liquids extraction point • Existing systems with some expansions can move both Mackenzie Delta and Alaskan gas to growth markets B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Prudhoe Bay Mackenzie Delta 4.0 bcf/d 1.2 bcf/d Boundary Lake 4.0 bcf/d 1.2 bcf/d Seattle Chicago San Francisco Continental Gas Demand and Supply • Arctic gas will flow to both eastern and western markets B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt
Concluding Remarks • There will be a home for Arctic gas • Both Arctic pipelines are required • Mackenzie Valley project is viable, but proponents, governments and regulators must be creative • The pipeline is only one component of development B-Scott_Mackenzie-Valley_Oct-19-2001.ppt