1 / 19

Planning & Conducting Investigations

Planning & Conducting Investigations. Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013. A complaint arrives on your desk. What do you do now?. Steps in Conducting an Investigation. 1. Develop a theory of the case. 2. Identify sources of information.

mihaly
Download Presentation

Planning & Conducting Investigations

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning & Conducting Investigations Markus H. Meier Assistant Director African Competition Forum March 25, 2013

  2. A complaint arrives on your desk. What do you do now?

  3. Steps in Conducting an Investigation 1. Develop a theory of the case. 2. Identify sources of information. 3. Interview witnesses. 4. Request documents and data. 5. Organize and assess the evidence. 6. Determine whether there is a violation of law.

  4. Step 1Develop a Theory of the Case • Review the complaint and all public information. • Identify possible legal theories. • List elements of proof and facts needed to establish each element of a legal theory. • Think about likely economic harm to competition. • Consider possible justifications & defenses. • Identify possible remedies.

  5. Is There a Violation of the Law? The Law Elements of Proof Facts Investigative Techniques for Finding the Facts

  6. Elements of Proof for Abuse of Dominance • A dominant position: • Relevant market • High market share • Conduct to acquire or maintain the dominant position that is unreasonable • No legitimate business justification • Anticompetitive effects

  7. Purpose of Investigation:Find Facts to Prove or Disprovethe Theory of the Case ElementsFacts • Dominant Position ??? • Conduct to Acquire or Maintain ??? • No Legitimate Business Justification ??? 4. Anticompetitive Effects ???

  8. Step 2Identify Sources of Information • Witnesses • Documents & Data • Government Sources • Public Sources • Related Investigations • Others?

  9. Step 3Interview Witnesses • Purpose: To learn facts needed to prove or disprove the elements of the violation under investigation. • Types of Witnesses to Interview: • Complainant • Competitors • Customers • Suppliers, Distributors & Retailers • Government Agencies • Business/Trade Organizations • Industry Experts, Analysts, and Academics • Target

  10. Step 4Request Documents & Data • Purpose: To learn facts needed to prove or disprove the elements of the violation under investigation. • Methods for Getting Documents & Data –Voluntary requests • Letters, telephone calls • Compulsory requests • Subpoenas, CIDs, Second Requests

  11. Sources of Documents • Complainant • Competitors • Customers • Suppliers, Distributors & Retailers • Government Agencies • Business/Trade Organizations • Industry Experts, Analysts • Target

  12. Types of Document to Seek • The contract or agreement at issue. • Company formation documents. • Company organizational charts. • Company financial reports. • Business, marketing, and strategic plans. • Customer, supplier, and competitor lists. • Sales, production, and market share data. • Records of meetings.

  13. Reviewing Documents • Check for completeness and compliance with request. • Review for: • Facts that help prove or disprove the theory of the case. • Background information about the industry, companies, competitors, and customers. • Things that are not clear and require follow-up questioning of a witness. • Other potential sources of relevant information. • Organize documents by date, issue, witness.

  14. Sequence for Gathering Information Complainant Documents Witness Interviews Target

  15. Step 5Organize and Assess the Evidence • Organize the investigative files: – Correspondence – Documents & document requests – Interview reports – Witness files – Memoranda, legal research & notes • Develop a chronology. • Prepare a proof checklist.

  16. Proof Checklist Abuse of Dominance

  17. Assessing the Evidence • Is there sufficient evidence to establish each element of proof? • Is the evidence likely to be admissible? • Personal knowledge • Non-hearsay or hearsay exception • How strong is the evidence? • Credibility of the witnesses • Consistency & completeness of the story • The investigative process should continue until there is enough evidence to confidently support or reject the theory of the case.

  18. Step 6Determine Whether there Is a Law Violation Does the “story” of the case satisfy the following: • It’s about people who have reasons for how they act. • It accounts for all of the “facts beyond change.” • It consists of admissible evidence, told by credible witnesses, and supported by the documents & data. • It accords with common sense. • It includes all of the elements of proof of a legally cognizable violation of the law.

  19. The Investigative Process Develop a Theory Analyze the Evidence Identify Sources Interview Witnesses Request Documents

More Related