1 / 16

Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind

Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind. Steven R. Cranmer Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics. Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind. Outline: Coronal heating & solar wind acceleration Preferential ion heating

milek
Download Presentation

Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models of the Solar Wind

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models ofthe Solar Wind Steven R. CranmerHarvard-SmithsonianCenter for Astrophysics

  2. Incorporating Kinetic Effects into Global Models ofthe Solar Wind • Outline: • Coronal heating & solar wind acceleration • Preferential ion heating • Possible explanations from MHD turbulence Steven R. CranmerHarvard-SmithsonianCenter for Astrophysics

  3. The extended solar atmosphere

  4. The extended solar atmosphere The “coronal heating problem”

  5. Solar wind acceleration • We still do not understand the processes responsible for heating the corona, but we know that T~ 106 K creates enough gas pressure to accelerate the solar wind. • A likely scenario is that the Sun produces MHD waves that propagate up open flux tubes, partially reflect back down, and undergo a turbulent cascade until they are damped at small scales, causing heating. Z– Z+ Z– (e.g., Matthaeus et al. 1999) • Cranmer et al. (2007) explored the wave/turbulence paradigm with self-consistent 1D models, and found a wide range of agreement with observations. Ulysses 1994-1995

  6. Coronal heating: multi-fluid, collisionless

  7. Coronal heating: multi-fluid, collisionless O+5 O+6 In the lowest density solar wind streams . . . electron temperatures proton temperatures heavy ion temperatures

  8. Alfven wave’s oscillating E and B fields ion’s Larmor motion around radial B-field Preferential ion heating & acceleration • Parallel-propagating ion cyclotron waves (10–10,000 Hz in the corona) have been suggested as a “natural” energy source . . . instabilities dissipation lower qi/mi faster diffusion (e.g., Cranmer 2001)

  9. However . . . Does a turbulent cascade of Alfvén waves (in the low-beta corona) actually produce ion cyclotron waves? Most models say NO!

  10. Anisotropic MHD turbulence • When magnetic field is strong, the basic building block of turbulence isn’t an “eddy,” but an Alfvén wave packet. k ? Energy input k

  11. Anisotropic MHD turbulence • When magnetic field is strong, the basic building block of turbulence isn’t an “eddy,” but an Alfvén wave packet. • Alfvén waves propagate ~freely in the parallel direction (and don’t interact easily with one another), but field lines can “shuffle” in the perpendicular direction. • Thus, when the background field is strong, cascade proceeds mainly in the plane perpendicular to field (Strauss 1976; Montgomery 1982). k Energy input k

  12. Anisotropic MHD turbulence • When magnetic field is strong, the basic building block of turbulence isn’t an “eddy,” but an Alfvén wave packet. • Alfvén waves propagate ~freely in the parallel direction (and don’t interact easily with one another), but field lines can “shuffle” in the perpendicular direction. • Thus, when the background field is strong, cascade proceeds mainly in the plane perpendicular to field (Strauss 1976; Montgomery 1982). k ion cyclotron waves Ωp/VA kinetic Alfvén waves • In a low-β plasma, cyclotron waves heat ions & protons when they damp, but kinetic Alfvén waves are Landau-damped, heating electrons. Energy input k Ωp/cs

  13. Parameters in the solar wind • What wavenumber angles are “filled” by anisotropic Alfvén-wave turbulence in the solar wind? (gray) • What is the angle that separates ion/proton heating from electron heating? (purple curve) θ k k Goldreich &Sridhar (1995) electron heating proton & ion heating

  14. Nonlinear mode coupling? • There is observational evidence for compressive (non-Alfvén) waves, too . . . k k ion cyclotron waves Fast-mode waves (right-hand polarized) & Alfvén waves (left-hand polarized) k k

  15. Preliminary coupling results • Chandran (2005) suggested that weak turbulence couplings (AAF, AFF) may be sufficient to transfer enough energy to Alfvén waves at high parallel wavenumber. • New simulations in the presence of “strong” Alfvénic turbulence (e.g., Goldreich & Sridhar 1995) show that these couplings may indeed give rise to wave power that looks like a kind of “parallel cascade” (Cranmer, Chandran, & van Ballegooijen 2011) r = 2 Rs β ≈ 0.003

  16. Conclusions • Advances in MHD turbulence theory continue to help improve our understanding about coronal heating and solar wind acceleration. • The postulated coupling mechanism is only one possible solution: see SH43D-03 (stochastic KAWs), SH54B-01 (gyrokinetic turb.), SH53A-01 (current sheets), ... • However, we still do not have complete enough observational constraintsto be able to choose between competing theories. For more information: http://www.cfa.harvard.edu/~scranmer/

More Related