60 likes | 109 Views
Janus v. AFSCME. Janus vs. ASFME. US Supreme Court Justices:
E N D
Janus vs. ASFME US Supreme Court Justices: Front row, left to right: Associate Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Associate Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, Chief Justice John G. Roberts, Jr., Associate Justice Clarence Thomas, Associate Justice Stephen G. Breyer. Back row: Associate Justice Elena Kagan, Associate Justice Samuel A. Alito, Jr., Associate Justice Sonia Sotomayor, Associate Justice Neil M. Gorsuch.Credit: Franz Jantzen, Collection of the Supreme Court of the United States NYSUT
Janus argues it is unconstitutional for public employers to deduct fair share fees and other similar union agency fees. Janus v AFSCME Janus v. AFSCME NYSUT
What are the chances the Supreme Court would ultimately agree with Plaintiffs’ arguments? There are 28 states now supporting right-to-work laws!
Kenosha, WI Before and After • In 2011, Scott Walker’s Act 10 resulted in the loss of agency fee • Kenosha had a 92-page collective bargaining agreement prior to the passage of the act • By July 2017 their contract was reduced to 2 pages!