1 / 37

Extensions of Non-negative Matrix Factorization to Higher Order data

Extensions of Non-negative Matrix Factorization to Higher Order data. Morten Mørup Informatics and Mathematical Modeling Intelligent Signal Processing Technical University of Denmark. Sæby, May 22-2006. Parts of the work done in collaboration with. Sidse M. Arnfred, Dr. Med. PhD

mills
Download Presentation

Extensions of Non-negative Matrix Factorization to Higher Order data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Extensions of Non-negative Matrix Factorization to Higher Order data Morten Mørup Informatics and Mathematical Modeling Intelligent Signal Processing Technical University of Denmark Morten Mørup

  2. Sæby, May 22-2006 Parts of the work done in collaboration with Sidse M. Arnfred, Dr. Med. PhD Cognitive Research Unit Hvidovre Hospital University Hospital of Copenhagen Mikkel N. Schmidt, Stud. PhDDepartment of Signal Processing Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark Lars Kai Hansen, Professor Department of Signal Processing Informatics and Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark Morten Mørup

  3. Outline • Non-negativity Matrix Factorization (NMF) • Sparse coding (SNMF) • Convolutive PARAFAC models (cPARAFAC) • Higher Order Non-negative Matrix Factorization(an extension of NMF to the Tucker model) Morten Mørup

  4. NMF is based on Gradient Descent NMF: VWH s.t. Wi,d,Hd,j0 Let C be a given cost function, then update the parameters according to: Morten Mørup

  5. The idea behind multiplicative updates Positive term Negative term Morten Mørup

  6. Non-negative matrix factorization (NMF) (Lee & Seung - 2001) NMF gives Part based representation (Lee & Seung – Nature 1999) Morten Mørup

  7. The NMF decomposition is not unique Simplical Cone NMF only unique when data adequately spans the positive orthant (Donoho & Stodden - 2004) Morten Mørup

  8. Sparse Coding NMF (SNMF) (Eggert & Körner, 2004) Morten Mørup

  9. Illustration (the swimmer problem) Swimmer Articulations NMF Expressions SNMF Expressions True Expressions Morten Mørup

  10. Why sparseness? • Ensures uniqueness • Eases interpretability (sparse representation  factor effects pertain to fewer dimensions) • Can work as model selection(Sparseness can turn off excess factors by letting them become zero) • Resolves over complete representations (when model has many more free variables than data points) Morten Mørup

  11. PART I: Convolutive PARAFAC (cPARAFAC) Morten Mørup

  12. By cPARAFAC means PARAFAC convolutive in at least one modality Convolution: The process of generating Xby convolving (sending) the sources S through the filter A Deconvolution: The process of estimating the filter A from X and S Convolution can be in any combination of modalities -Single convolutive, double convolutive etc. Morten Mørup

  13. Relation to other models • PARAFAC2 (Harshman, Kiers, Bro) • Shifted PARAFAC (Hong and Harshman, 2003) 3 3 cPARAFAC can account for echo effects cPARAFAC becomes shifted PARAFAC when convolutive filter is sparse Morten Mørup

  14. Application example of cPARAFAC Transcription and separation of music Morten Mørup

  15. The ‘ideal’ Log-frequency Magnitude Spectrogram of an instrument Tchaikovsky: Violin Concert in D Major • Different notes played by aninstrument corresponds on a logarithmic frequency scale to a translation of the same harmonicstructure of a fixed temporal pattern Mozart Sonate no,. 16 in C Major Morten Mørup

  16. NMF 2D deconvolution (NMF2D1): The Basic Idea • Model a log-spectrogram of polyphonic music by an extended type of non-negative matrix factorization: • The frequency signature of a specific note played by an instrument has a fixed temporal pattern (echo) model convolutive in time • Different notes of same instrument has same time-log-frequency signature but varying in fundamental frequency (shift)  model convolutive in the log-frequency axis. (1Mørup & Scmidt, 2006) Morten Mørup

  17. NMF2D Model • NMF2D Model – extension of NMFD1: (1Smaragdis, 2004, Eggert et al. 2004, Fitzgerald et al. 2005) Morten Mørup

  18. Understanding the NMF2D Model Morten Mørup

  19. The NMF2D has inherent ambiguity between the structure in W and H To resolve this ambiguity sparsity is imposed on H to force ambiguous structure onto W Morten Mørup

  20. Real music example of how imposing sparseness resolves the ambiguity between W and H NMF2D SNMF2D Morten Mørup

  21. Extension to multi channel analysis by the PARAFAC model Not unique Unique!! Factor analysis(Charles Spearman ~1900) PARAFAC(Harshman & Carrol and Chang 1970) Morten Mørup

  22. cPARAFAC: Sparse Non-negative Tensor Factor 2D deconvolution (SNTF2D) (Extension of Fitzgerald et al. 2005, 2006 to form a sparse double deconvolution) Morten Mørup

  23. SNTF2D algorithms Morten Mørup

  24. Tchaikovsky: Violin Concert in D Major Mozart Sonate no. 16 in C Major Morten Mørup

  25. Stereo recording of ”Fog is Lifting” by Carl Nielsen Morten Mørup

  26. Applications • Applications • Source separation. • Music information retrieval. • Automatic music transcription (MIDI compression). • Source localization (beam forming) Morten Mørup

  27. PART II: Higher Order NMF (HONMF) Morten Mørup

  28. Spectroscopy data (Smilde et al. 1999,2004, Andersson & Bro 1998, Nørgard & Ridder 1994) Web mining (Sun et al., 2004) Image Analysis(Vasilescu and Terzopoulos, 2002, Wang and Ahuja, 2003, Jian and Gong, 2005) Semantic Differential Data(Murakami and Kroonenberg, 2003) And many more…… Higher Order Non-negative Matrix Factorization (HONMF) Motivation: Many of the data sets previously explored by the Tucker model are non-negative and could with good reason be decomposed under constraints of non-negativity on all modalities including the core. Morten Mørup

  29. However, non-negative Tucker decompositions are not in general unique! But - Imposing sparseness overcomes this problem! Morten Mørup

  30. The Tucker Model Morten Mørup

  31. Algorithms for HONMF Morten Mørup

  32. Results HONMF with sparseness, above imposed on the core canbe used for model selection -here indicating the PARAFAC model is the appropriate model to the data. Furthermore, the HONMF gives a more part based hence easy interpretable solution than the HOSVD. Morten Mørup

  33. Evaluation of uniqueness Morten Mørup

  34. Data of a Flow Injection Analysis (Nørrgaard, 1994) HONMF with sparse core and mixing captures unsupervised the true mixing and model order! Morten Mørup

  35. Conclusion • HONMF not in general unique, however when imposing sparseness uniqueness can be achieved. • Algorithms devised for LS and KL able to impose sparseness on any combination of modalities • The HONMF decompositions more part based hence easier to interpret than other Tucker decompositions such as the HOSVD. • Imposing sparseness can work as model selection turning of excess components Morten Mørup

  36. Coming soon in a MATLAB implementation near You Morten Mørup

  37. References Carroll, J. D. and Chang, J. J. Analysis of individual differences in multidimensional scaling via an N-way generalization of "Eckart-Young" decomposition, Psychometrika 35 1970 283--319 Eggert, J. and Korner, E. Sparse coding and NMF. In Neural Networks volume 4, pages 2529-2533, 2004 Eggert, J et al Transformation-invariant representation and nmf. In Neural Networks, volume 4 , pages 535-2539, 2004 Fiitzgerald, D. et al. Non-negative tensor factorization for sound source separation. In proceedings of Irish Signals and Systems Conference, 2005 FitzGerald, D. and Coyle, E. C Sound source separation using shifted non.-negative tensor factorization. In ICASSP2006, 2006 Fitzgerald, D et al. Shifted non-negative matrix factorization for sound source separation. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference on Statistics in Signal Processing. 2005 Harshman, R. A. Foundations of the PARAFAC procedure: Models and conditions for an "explanatory" multi-modal factor analysis},UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 16 1970 1—84 Harshman, Richard A.Harshman and Hong, Sungjin Lundy, Margaret E. Shifted factor analysis—Part I: Models and properties J. Chemometrics (17) pages 379–388, 2003 Kiers, Henk A. L. and Berge, Jos M. F. ten and Bro, Rasmus PARAFAC2 - Part I. A direct fitting algorithm for the PARAFAC2 model, Journal of Chemometrics (13) nr.3-4 pages 275-294, 1999 Lathauwer, Lieven De and Moor, Bart De and Vandewalle, Joos MULTILINEAR SINGULAR VALUE DECOMPOSITION.SIAM J. MATRIX ANAL. APPL.2000 (21)1253–1278 Lee, D.D. and Seung, H.S. Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In NIPS, pages 556-462, 2000 Lee, D.D and Seung, H.S. Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization, NATURE 1999 Murakami, Takashi and Kroonenberg, Pieter M. Three-Mode Models and Individual Differences in Semantic Differential Data, Multivariate Behavioral Research(38) no. 2 pages 247-283, 2003 Mørup, M. and Hansen, L.K.and Arnfred, S.M.Decomposing the time-frequency representation of EEG using nonnegative matrix and multi-way factorization Technical report, Institute for Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, 2006a Mørup, M. and Schmidt, M.N. Sparse non-negative matrix factor 2-D deconvolution. Technical report, Institute for Mathematical Modeling, Tehcnical University of Denmark, 2006b Mørup, M and Schmidt, M.N. Non-negative Tensor Factor 2D Deconvolution for multi-channel time-frequency analysis. Technical report, Institute for Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, 2006c Schmidt, M.N. and Mørup, M. Non-negative matrix factor 2D deconvolution for blind single channel source separation. In ICA2006, pages 700-707, 2006d Mørup, M. and Hansen, L.K.and Arnfred, S.M. Algorithms for Sparse Higher Order Non-negative Matrix Factorization (HONMF), Technical report, Institute for Mathematical Modeling, Technical University of Denmark, 2006e Nørgaard, L and Ridder, C.Rank annihilation factor analysis applied to flow injection analysis with photodiode-array detection Chemometrics and Intelligent Laboratory Systems 1994 (23) 107-114 Schmidt, M.N. and Mørup, M. Sparse Non-negative Matrix Factor 2-D Deconvolution for Automatic Transcription of Polyphonic Music, Technical report, Institute for Mathematical Modelling, Tehcnical University of Denmark, 2005 Smaragdis, P. Non-negative Matrix Factor deconvolution; Extraction of multiple sound sources from monophonic inputs. International Symposium on independent Component Analysis and Blind Source Separation (ICA)W Smilde, Age K. Smilde and Tauller, Roma and Saurina, Javier and Bro, Rasmus, Calibration methods for complex second-order data Analytica Chimica Acta 1999 237-251 Sun, Jian-Tao and Zeng, Hua-Jun and Liu, Huanand Lu Yuchang and Chen Zheng CubeSVD: a novel approach to personalized Web search WWW '05: Proceedings of the 14th international conference on World Wide Web pages 382—390, 2005 Tamara G. Kolda Multilinear operators for higher-order decompositions technical report Sandia national laboratory 2006 SAND2006-2081. Tucker, L. R. Some mathematical notes on three-mode factor analysis Psychometrika 31 1966 279—311 Welling, M. and Weber, M. Positive tensor factorization. Pattern Recogn. Lett. 2001 Vasilescu , M. A. O. and Terzopoulos , Demetri Multilinear Analysis of Image Ensembles: TensorFaces, ECCV '02: Proceedings of the 7th European Conference on Computer Vision-Part I, 2002 Morten Mørup

More Related