1 / 21

Imagining the university

Sub-brand to go here. Imagining the university. Ronald Barnett Invited seminar, Ljubljana, February, 2012 r.barnett@ioe.ac.uk. Centre for Higher Education Studies. This talk. ‘Imagining the University’ - an examination of the idea itself

milo
Download Presentation

Imagining the university

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sub-brand to go here Imagining the university Ronald Barnett Invited seminar, Ljubljana, February, 2012 r.barnett@ioe.ac.uk Centre for Higher Education Studies

  2. This talk • ‘Imagining the University’ - an examination of the idea itself • What is it to imagine the university? • What are the forms of the imagination – in imagining the university? • What is the role of/ the possibilities for the imagination? - and its limitations • What is its structure • And what is its prospects?

  3. A missing imagination? • Starting reflection: that the current debate as to the idea of the university is hopelessly impoverished • Dominated by considerations of the market, competition, customerisation, ‘knowledge-for-sale’, audit, regulation .. • 3 tacit (or not so tacit) ideas: • The Entrepreneurial University • The Corporate University • The Bureaucratic university • A dominant discourse • NB – tensions here; perhaps even spaces.

  4. Hopelessly impoverished? • Impoverished since • Narrow, dominant • Lacking considerations of global and even personal wellbeing; or even possibility • Lacking a care for the potential of the university – and the challenges upon the university – in the C12 • But also ‘hopelessly’ – lacking hope; visions of the future • Hope that things could come out better for the university • Or even differently, in fundamental ways

  5. Undue pessimism • NB: pessimism not without its merits – (Joshua Dienstag) • But unremitting bleakness even within much contemporary scholarship • ‘Commodification’ • ‘Neo-liberalism’ • ‘Quality regimes’ • ‘Managerialism’ • ‘Performativity’ • ‘The regulative/ evaluative state’ • Not undue optimism • Believe matters could go better – grounded optimism • Positive possibilism • But what is possible? Not likely but possible

  6. Feasible utopias • Identifying possibilities • Not neutral • But value-laden • Utopian – probably will not be reached • But not out of reach • Already instances embryonically visible • Empirical warrant (G&D) • A muted pessimism - things could go better

  7. A critical project of the imagination • Large role for the imagination • Concept of ‘the imaginary’ • Taylor – building on traditions, collective sediments • Kearney – imagination based on narratives; a psycho-phenomenology of the imagination • Sartre – more one of building the future; of willing the future • A strike for freedom • A critical project – identified shortcomings in the present • Articulation of imaginative concepts - critical standards

  8. Responsible anarchism • The imagination and responsibility: a complex set of relationships • The imagination should, firstly, be anarchic; it should fly, unconstrained, to envision new possibilities and to find a new language (new ‘conceptual grammars’ – Morley) • Guided by responsibility, responsiveness to counter-values, new ideas are created, imagined; searching for a poetry of the university • But then this imagination needs to be restrained by ‘responsibility’ in/to the real world: head in the clouds and feet on the ground • The anarchic imagination has to be responsible; even poets have to live in the real world • (This amounts to an exercise in ‘imaginative critical realism’ – being real and being critical but also being imaginative.)

  9. (Some) Ideas of the university • The metaphysical university • The research university • The entrepreneurial university • The neoliberal university • The postmodern university • The bureaucratic university • The networked university • The liquid university • The therapeutic university • The soulless university • The ecological university • NB: the formal structure of each phrase is the same – but they vary considerably in their imaginative weight.

  10. Imagining the university • The romantic imagination • The empirical imagination • The ideological imagination • The hopeful imagination • The dystopian imagination • The utopian imagination • ie reaching towards a structure of the imagination; • And a layered structure at that.

  11. The romantic imagination • The metaphysical university • The liberal university • The civic university • The service university • The research university

  12. The empirical imagination • The bureaucratic university • The corporate university • The marketised university • The commodified university • The capitalist university • The performative university

  13. The ideological imagination • The entrepreneurial university • (The enterprise university) • The accessible university (the ‘open’ university) • The European university • The global university • The postmodern university

  14. The hopeful imagination • The borderless university • The networked university • The liquid university [Bauman] • The supercomplex university • The therapeutic university • The edgeless university (Bradwell)

  15. The dystopian imagination • The soulless university • The subservient university • The selfish university • The self-important university NB Problem – the dystopian university has already arrived (the ideological and the actual)

  16. Ideas of the university – a framework (3 axes) • Endorsing – Critical • Surface – Deep • Pessimism – Optimism eg ‘Entrepreneurial University’ – endorsing/ deep/ optimistic ‘Edgeless University’ – critical/ surface/ optimistic ‘Capitalistic University’ – critical/ deep/ pessimistic

  17. Critical questions – and a challenge • Can we find/ identify/ imagine ideas and forms of the university that do not succumb unduly to ideology? • After all, ‘We cannot jump out of our psychological and sociological skins’ (Gellner) • Can we avoid undue pessimism on the one hand, and seduction by ‘the self-images of the age’ (MacIntyre) on the other hand? • - and so we return to our initial hope/ idea of ‘feasible utopias’ Challenge – is that of imaginative ideas that are critical/ deep/ & optimistic - This is where feasible utopias would be found • Is there space for such ideas to be realised in the twenty-first century? • Or has the space for the university so shrunk that such ideas (even if they could be forthcoming) could not be realised?

  18. The utopian imagination • The anarchic university/ the iconoclastic university • The authentic university • The dialogical university • The ecological university • The perverse university • The public university (Masschelein/ Simons) • The socialist university (Peters) • The foolish university (Kavanagh) • The wise university (Maxwell) • The virtuous university (Nixon) • The theatrical university (Parker)

  19. Criteria of adequacy - Range (theory/ ideas/ practice/ policy) • Depth (structures/ experience/ ideas) • Feasibility (power/ organization) • Ethics (flourishing – human/ organizational/ societal/ global) • Continuing possibilities/ emergent properties • Severe tests, but they will extend imaginative ideas • - and help to provide a legitimation of the imagination • - supplying potency and efficaciousness to the imagination

  20. The Ecological University(or: Prospects of/ for the imagination) [A case study] • Sees itself within and as part of a global ecology • Does what it can to enable the world to flourish (not just to ‘sustain’ it) • Has a care/ concern (H) for the world • Is active/ is engaged with the world; reaches into the world • Puts its knowledges to work in the interests of the world This imaginary university passes muster against all of the tests of adequacy (previous slide) - of range, depth, feasibility, ethics and possible emergence.

  21. Conclusion • We need to imagine the university anew • (The imagination is prior to the imaginary) • We need lots of imaginative ideas – and daring, bold thinking; identifying the best in all possible worlds: ie, utopian thinking • But there is a responsibility on the imagination – to identify feasible ideas of the university – ie, feasible utopias • Feasible utopias are neither unduly optimistic nor unduly pessimistic • - but hold out critical standards against which to test emerging ‘universities’ and to steer us towards positive possibilities – positive possibilism. • The university just could help us towards a better world – • The imagination isn’t a sufficient condition – but it is a necessary condition. Institute of Education University of London 20 Bedford Way London WC1H 0AL Tel +44 (0)20 7612 6000 Fax +44 (0)20 7612 6126 Email info@ioe.ac.uk Web www.ioe.ac.uk

More Related