190 likes | 337 Views
Intelligent Information Systems for Emergency Management. Dr Milorad Tosic. Emergency Management. Stakeholders Individuals Enterprises Whole society Future generations Nature of the system factors Extremely low probability Extremely high impact
E N D
Intelligent Information Systems for Emergency Management Dr Milorad Tosic
Emergency Management • Stakeholders • Individuals • Enterprises • Whole society • Future generations • Nature of the system factors • Extremely low probability • Extremely high impact • Extremely complex systems (people, services, equipment, management, technology, etc.) that must be ready in a very long period of time (ideally indefinitely) just to be used for a very short period of time (during the emergent situation).
Intelligent Information Systems (IIS) • Core concepts [TOSMIL,TOS,CH] • (Context sensitive) Semantics • Active distributed knowledge • Complex adaptive systems • Interactive communities of agents (human as well as software) • IIS value-add • PEOPLE PEOPLE PEOPLE make the system intelligent, effective and successful!!!
Quality of interaction on the Web? • How many of you have ever used the Web? • (ALL – easy, available, valuable, pervasive) • How many of you want to contribute to Web site building? • (CONFLICT – contribute ALL – tedious building FIEW) • How many of you personally maintain or hire a service to maintain your Web site? • (FIEW or DON’T KNOW – tedious work requiring technical knowledge) • How many of you have had a problem updating your site? • (FIEW – due to expensive SA support, UPDATES ARE REAR AND RISKY)
Quality of interaction on the Web? • How many of you have the need for collaborative mechanisms and group support? • (ALL have the need but FIEW recognize the need) • How many of you have the need to accumulate personal knowledge built over a general topic? • (ALL have the need but FIEW have first-hand experience) • What about distributed, shared, and community knowledge? • (Value for ALL but critical mass threshold is high) • How many of you would like to have easy access to national heritage knowledge and interact with it? • (ALL – but REQUIRES Next Generation National Heritage Infrastructure)
Our answer: Collaborative Semantic Web Portal Prototype • Collaborative workspace that brings together • People • Relevant information, • Knowledge, • Interaction, • Innovative methodologies, and • Supporting Tools
Our answer: Collaborative Semantic Web Portal Prototype • Prototype: • Inter- as well as intra-community collaboration, • Workflow and Process management, • Interaction, • Knowledge sharing and dissemination, • Heterogeneous information integration, • Awareness building. • Mechanisms: • System login and working groups, • Interaction over content, • Interaction over structure, • Interaction over presentation semantics,
System login and working groups Not in Work Group? You don’t have privileges to VIEW and EDIT this page content • Permissions for users and working groups: • VIEW page content • EDIT page content • PRINT page content • CREATE new page • ATTACHMENTS per page
Menu creating and editing Page attachments as documents and pictures Page and content creating and editing Different ways of the content printing
Interaction over content: Content printing • Pretty printing • Pure text printing • PDF printing • MS Word printing
Interaction over structure: Automatic Links • Automatic links for page neighborhood (links pointing to the page and links pointing from the page) • Useful for drop-down menus within main menu as well as page-specific menus reflecting current context
Interaction over presentation semantics • Importing inter and intra web pages or their some part into page content
Interaction over presentation semantics • Personalization and configuration of several existing applications
Our experience so far • Education • Student-teacher communication is improved • Students are more active on the projects • Management of the course is more natural • Students like this approach • Agile project management • Interactive distributed meeting minutes administration • Project knowledge accumulation • Project members have location-independent access to shared project’s documentation over the Web • Automatic e-mail notification about changes in the shared workspace
Future work: P2P Semantic Web for robust distributed storage • Self organizing complex system for “storage – for forever” and semantic collaboration
Conclusion • Intelligent information systems • Collaboration and easy access to information • Personal knowledge accumulation • Distributed, shared, and community knowledge • Interaction over multiple dimensions: • Content • Structure • Presentation semantics • Heterogeneous application integration • Robust distributed storage for knowledge archiving
References [TOS] Milorad Tosic, “Meta-Architecture for Intelligent Information Systems”, Workshop on Designing for Reflective Practitioners: Sharing and Assessing Progress by Diverse Communities, CHI2004. [TOSMIL] M. Tosic, V. Milicevic, "Social Networking in the University Education Process", Workshop on Tools for CS Education, Fourth International Conference for Informatics and Information Technology, CIIT 2003. [HZ] Hai Zhuge, “Semantic Grid: Scientific Issues, Infrastructure, and Methodology”, Communications of ACM, April 2005., Vol.48, No. 4, pp. 117-119
Intelligent Information Systems for Emergency Management Questions? http://infosys1.elfak.ni.ac.yu