1 / 49

Social Science in cyberspace

Social Science in cyberspace. Marco Janssen and Allen Lee Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity School of Human Evolution and Social Change. Experiment. Everybody gets a piece of paper. Please, be silent, this is an experiment. Rules of the Game.

milton
Download Presentation

Social Science in cyberspace

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Social Science in cyberspace Marco Janssen and Allen Lee Center for the Study of Institutional Diversity School of Human Evolution and Social Change

  2. Experiment • Everybody gets a piece of paper.

  3. Please, be silent, this is an experiment

  4. Rules of the Game • Suppose you get 100 dollars. You are matched to a random other person in this room. • You need to make a decision how much of thess 100 dollars to give to the other anonymous person and how much to keep for your selves. • The other person can decide to accept your offer or reject. If the person reject both of you do not get anything. • Write down how much of the 100 dollars you like to offer the other person.

  5. Ultimatum Game • The experiment you played was an ultimatum game. The typical answer is 40%

  6. Ethical dilemmas in doing experiments with humans

  7. Limitations of controlled experiments • Small groups in artificial setting doing unusual tasks • Internet leads to new opportunities of doing experiments with large groups: • Natural experiments: open source projects, amazon.com, ebay, myspace… • Virtual worlds: studying the behavior of actual people in alternative worlds

  8. The Scientific Research Potential of Virtual Worlds

  9. Open source projects • Largest portals: Sourceforge.net: • 145.000 projects registered, with 67.000 projects with download statistics • the top five projects alone (eMule, Azureus, Ares Galaxy, Bittorrent and DC++) account for roughly 30% of the overall downloads • Most projects not successful • Can we use data to analyze the conditions what make open source projects successful?

  10. Statistics available • Project level data • ‘Demographics’ (Start date, license etc) • Team (Founder, roles etc) • Communications (Email lists, IRC etc) • Code repositories and release history • Cross project data • Project lists and counts • Relative statistics (Downloads, activity etc)

  11. Developer numbers 67% never more than 1 developer, only 1.9% have had >10 developers

  12. E-Bay and reputation • Randomized controlled field experiment of an Internet reputation mechanism. A high-reputation, established eBay dealer sold matched pairs of lots—batches of vintage postcards—under his regular identity and under new seller identities (also operated by him). As predicted, the established identity fared better. The difference in buyers’ willingness-to-pay was 8.1% of the selling price.

  13. Social Networks and the spread of information • Data used to study how information (or viruses) spread in social networks. • Data from: • Myspace • Amazon.com • Blogs • email traffic • Website links

  14. Virtual worlds - Massively multiplayer online games (MMOGs) - Virtual worlds without gaming

  15. 1972

  16. Full Spectrum Warrior 2004

  17. Scripting Virtual Worlds • WoW scripting is purely event driven, always in response to something happening in the world

  18. Event driven? Your code only gets executed as a result of some thing happening on the server Limits autonomous data collection Designed to prevent “botting”

  19. Second Life More flexible than WoW, state-event driven Centered around the state of objects in the world Allows botting User created content Script objects in addition to collect data

  20. Limitations and Challenges Data collection Environment control Difficult programming platform – compile/edit/test cycle is onerous Observer effect

  21. Observer Effect Take Two

  22. June 2006

  23. MMOG Industry • 2003 U.S. Industry Profit Numbers • Gaming Industry $10.0 billion • Online Games (2003) $ 1.9 billion • Online Games (2009) $ 9.8 billion • Hollywood box office movies $ 9.5 billion • Music industry $14.3 billion • Home video rentals $19.0 billion • Virtual worlds are significant: • Larger populations than some major real cities • Larger economies than some major real countries • Substantial time investment • Diversity of those who play

  24. Growing Impact • Percent of American Adults Online (Pew) • 2000: 50 percent • 2005: 66 percent • 2006: 73 percent – 147m people • By 2011, 80 percent of web users to have ‘second life’ (Gartner) • More than 100m avatars by the 2012 election – in America alone

  25. What is a MMOG? • Online role-playing game… • Large number of players (10,000 on single sever ) • Players create fictional character within the game (represented by an avatar) • Players control all aspects of avatar within the game: • Earning a living • Buying food and clothing • Interacting with other players • Players might spend ‘in-game’ time: • Trading with other players; starting a business; joining a guild; creating a community; building a house; etc. • Objective of MMORPGs differ: • Acquire gold; build status; conquer worlds; create marketable goods/services; etc.

  26. Example: World of Warcraft (WoW) • (Currently most popular MMOG) • Currently >50% of overall market • >7.5M subscribers (November 2006) • ~4M China • ~2M North America • ~1M Europe • Initial player cost ~US$20 • Daily play cost ~US$0.50

  27. Virtual world without gaming • For example, Second Life (currently 6 milion citizens) • Features of Second Life: • User Created • Functional Economy • Proprietary Rights • Shared Spaces • Multimedia Platform • Voice Enabled (almost)

  28. Second Life

  29. property rights In Second Life, residents own their creations What does this mean? • Residents retain their Intellectual Property rights to their creations • Residents may buy and sell L$ for real world $ • Residents may license their creations back into the real world

  30. Video shared in a Community Space

  31. Music shared in a Community Space

  32. Conferences extended into a Virtual Community Space

  33. Prefabricated games: Fishing Kin focused his search criteria towards Prefabricated Games and the people who played them.

  34. Types of Social Science with virtual worlds • Ethnography (interviewing avatars) • Epidemiology (spreading of viruses) • Economics (selling virtual goods) • Psychology (can we trust avatars?) • Law (legal issues in virtual worlds)

  35. Virtual Economies • In-Game Economy: • Players can specialise, gaining valuable skills which others will pay for • Leads to competitive advantage + division of labour • Commerce: magic weapons, houses, goods and services can be bought and sold in game-currency • Need for property rights, and protection against crime • Second Life recognises IP rights for assets created in the world • Game economy mirrors many aspects of real economies

  36. Virtual Economies • Link to Real Economy: • Users willing to spend real time and money for virtual resources • Magic weapons, real estate, game-currency and characters are bought and sold on auction exchanges for real money (e.g. eBay) • http://www.gameusd.com/ lists virtual exchange rates • Examples: • Island in Project Entropia sold for U.S. $26,500 • Virtual space station for U.S. $100,000 • Level 60 EverQuest characters sell for up to $5,000 • Criticisms: • Many regard trading game items for real money as unethical • Blizzard (WoW) has banned it (but hard to enforce) • April 2006: Blizzard banned >5,400 players and suspended 10,700 (for farming, often using bots) • Sony launched “Sony Station Exchange” for EverQuest to legally buy&sell

  37. Virtual Economies • Some people have made the buying and selling of virtual property their full-time jobs. • Producers of economy are the teenage kids • Have a lot of time but no money • Do the hard work to produce items to be bought and sold • Consumers are rich who do not want to invest time • Much money to be made from accounts of long time players • Selling the items individually can generate large profit • Can make profit of $1,000 (US) per week • Some players making >$100,000 annually • Risky business without real-world laws to protect virtual property

  38. Virtual Economies – Second Life • Second Life gives property rights to players • Allows players to create new objects from primitives • Allows them to decide if these may be copied, modified or transferred • Residents actively trade their creations • In-world currency Linden dollars are exchangeable for hard currency • Top ten in-world entrepreneurs averaging $200,000 a year • Business Model: virtual property company • Residents lease property $20 per virtual “acre” per month • 25,000 residents, or about 3% or the population, lease property • Monthly revenues of $1m • Companies taking notice: • Toyota is selling virtual cars • Hopes for viral advertising

  39. Gold Farming • Gold Farmer = a player who farms items for the sole purpose of sale to other players via an out-of-game venue (e.g. eBay) • Most MMOGs include terms of service that forbid this • China dominant in market, but also in Eastern Europe, Mexico, Philippines • ~ 100,000 people in China employed as gold farmers (December 2005) • Represents about 0.4% of all online gamers in China • Typically work 12 hour shifts, sometimes up to 18 hour shifts, for 1 dollar an hour.

  40. “Virtual Law” • Practice of law via virtual worlds • Law as it applies to virtual worlds • Self-governance in Second Life

  41. Second Life as legal testing ground Residents' stake in Second Life • Intellectual property rights reserved to residents • Sales of goods and services • $L – US$ currency exchange • Land “ownership” Linden Lab's nonintervention policy • No centralized “zoning” • Minimal regulation of content (“broadly offensive” standard)‏ • No policing of transactions – caveat emptor

  42. 2007: Second Life in the courts and the news Right of publicity - Celebrity “look-alike” avatars Gambling - Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act (probably) applies to Second Life - Linden Lab bans gambling ads, then all gambling • Taxation of in-world transactions • - US government investigating taxation • - Tax in S Korea for major virtual businesses • Bank runs, exchange scandal and “ponzi schemes” • - Ginko bank collapse • - SL World Stock Exchange fraud • Contract law • Enforcing agreements in a semi-anonymous (and international) context

  43. 2007: Second Life in the courts and the news Criminal law • Financial fraud, identity theft, hacking (DarkLife theft) • Virtual rape investigation • Porn, money laundering, terrorism? • Rights and liberties on international stage -- most • restrictive common denominator? • “Broadly offensive” standard of behavior -- ambiguous, different standards in different areas and cultures • Gambling -- prohibition based on U.S. law; Europeans claim unfair • Linden Lab response to government demands for info -- whose standards will they use? • Land disputes • - Bragg v Linden – settled out of court • - “Landbot” class action – rumored • - Land scam: same land (allegedly) sold to 5 different buyers

  44. Asking personal questions(Aleks Krotoski) • Surveys • Who do you know? • Who do you communicate with? • Who do you trust? • Define your relationship: • Who’s trustworthy? • Who’s credible? • Who do you compare yourself with? • Who’s the most prototypical?

  45. N=675

  46. Spreading of infectious diseases • On Sept 13, 2005, an estimated 4 million players of the popular online role-playing game World of Warcraft encountered an unexpected challenge in the game, introduced in a software update released that day: a full-blown epidemic. ET Lofgren and NH Fefferman, The untapped potential of virtual game worlds to shed light on real world epidemics, Lancet Infect Dis 7 (2007), pp. 625–629. RD Balicer, Modeling infectious diseases dissemination through online role-playing games, Epidemiology 18 (2007), pp. 260–261

  47. Identity The androgynous-looking avatars were perceived as being less credible. The authors make a leap to trustworthiness and argue that human-like avatars are important for representing trustworthy avatars. Nowak, Kristine L. & Rauh, ChristianThe Influence of the Avatar on Online Perceptions of Anthropomorphism, Androgyny, Credibility, Homophily, and Attraction.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication11

  48. Problems with social science in virtual worlds • Biased sample of participants • Lack of control • Technical problems on performance of virtual environments • Unnatural behavior: teleporting, “death of avatar”, flying,

More Related