1 / 15

HAPL Project Review Pleasanton, California November 13-14, 2001 (IFSA2001 Paper #1113)

Reducing the Costs of Targets for Inertial Fusion Energy G.E. Besenbruch, D.T. Goodin, J.P. Dahlburg, K.R. Schultz, A. Nobile 1 , E.M. Campbell General Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California 92186-5608 1 Los Alamos National Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico.

mimis
Download Presentation

HAPL Project Review Pleasanton, California November 13-14, 2001 (IFSA2001 Paper #1113)

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Reducing the Costs of Targets for Inertial Fusion EnergyG.E. Besenbruch, D.T. Goodin, J.P. Dahlburg, K.R. Schultz,A. Nobile1, E.M. CampbellGeneral Atomics, P.O. Box 85608, San Diego, California 92186-56081Los Alamos National Laboratory, Albuquerque, New Mexico HAPL Project ReviewPleasanton, CaliforniaNovember 13-14, 2001(IFSA2001 Paper #1113)

  2. Feasibility of economical target fabrication is a critical issue for IFE power plants • A number of power plant conceptual designs are available • pulsed power systems that operate at ~6-10 Hz • Must supply about 500,000 targets per day with: • precision geometry, and cryogenic, layered DT fill Concept for “HILIFE-II” IFE 1000 MW(e) Power Plant (Chamber radius = 3 meters) .... Cost reductions from about $2500 to about $0.25 per target are needed for economical electricity production

  3. Preliminary target designs have been identified Some Expected Direct Drive Specifications Capsule Diameter 4 mm Shell Wall Thickness 200 m Foam shell density 20-120 mg/cc Out of Round <1% of radius Non-Concentricity <1% of wall thickness Shell Surface Finish 500 Angstroms RMS Ice Surface Finish <2 m RMS The heavy-ion driven target has a number of different regions NRL Radiation Preheat Target Other Potential Direct Drive Target Concepts Regions of low-density foams and unique materials Nuclear Fusion 39(11)D. A. Callahan-Miller and M. Tabak 0.25 g/cc foam Empty Outer Foam Seal, DT Dense ablator Thick Outer Capsule LLNL Close-Coupled HI Target Seal, DT

  4. Cost reductions of four orders of magnitude are challenging - but feasible ~3500 µm Current cost ~$2500/target ~1000 µm GDP Gas cooled reactor fuel particle with 4 coating layers PAMS Inertial fusion energy target Fuel particle scaleup experience is encouraging for IFE .... GA has previously used fluidized bed technology to reduce costs of coated nuclear fuel particles and produced over 1011 particles!

  5. Technological improvements lead to dramatic changes in products (i.e. Moore's Law) Technology Review, C. Mann, May/June 2000 .... The number of transistors on a chip increased 4 orders of magnitude from 1971 to 1999

  6. Moore's law analogies can be applied directly to cost reductions Main memory cost per byte (pence) Ref: http://www.cse.dmu.ac.uk/~cfi/Networks/WorkStations/Workstations5.htm Year The cost of computer memory decreased by 106 between 1970 and 1990. This was achieved through reductions in process costs and improvements in manufacturing technology.

  7. One can estimate IFE target production costs beginning with current experimental-target costs • One can find the approximate cost per current-day target by Total Project Cost/ Number of Delivered Targets = ~$2500 (capsule only) • However, there are tremendous differences in the program requirements - and in the consequent approaches to manufacture Item Experimental Program IFE Program Production Rate Relatively Small (~2500 targets per year by GA) 500,000 per day FOAK Costs Very high - targets always vary Essentially none Characterization Extensive - individual details needed Statistical sampling Product Yield Low - product varies, small amounts needed High Batch sizes Small - small amounts needed (<100) Large Eliminating FOAK Costs Reducing Characterization … IFE target cost reductions will be achieved by Increasing Batch Sizes Increasing Yield

  8. Costs will be dramatically lower when targets are identical - eliminates First of a Kind (FOAK) costs X=Halogen M=Metal M-GDP GDP M-X-GDP X-GDP 20 18 16 14 Wall thickness, µm 12 10 8 6 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 4 target batch # 2 0 • Currently delivered targets are nearly always unique - with most of the labor going to development and trial runs • We estimate the average FOAK labor now as hundreds of hours • These costs will be minimal for IFE production Today, few targets are made more than once! Example - Dopants and wall thicknesses vary on each batch ordered for experiments. .... For IFE, a single type of target is repeatedly produced, and FOAK development costs are essentially eliminated

  9. Large savings can be achieved in characterization and QC Currently, shot-quality targets are highly characterized before delivery  “pedigree” with detailed data on individual targets. Current manual characterization - ~8 hours per shell For the IFE Target Fabrication Facility, the cost of QC is reduced by: - reduced precision in IFE target designs - statistical sampling for process control - only periodic in-depth checks - automated characterization equipment .... Major characterization cost reductions can be achieved Future automated system for dimensional inspection of IFE target foam shells

  10. Process development focusing on routine production will result in high product yields After R&D and applying the science to process conditions, implosions are almost eliminated. First-of-a-kind thin walled capsules have low yield (imploded during solvent extraction) Target Fabrication Process Development Programs High Yields (like chemical industry processes) of >95% but same operations cost FOAK batches: low yields (1-5%)

  11. IFE target development programs must provide the technology basis for batch size increases and high yields Coating Bounce Pan Scaleable Processes Microencapsulation (shells) Fluidized bed coatings (shells) Interfacial polycondensation (seal coats) Sputter-coating (high-Z coatings) Casting (foams, hohlraum cases) Assembly (hohlraums, cryogenic, remote) Microencapsulation is inherently a high-volume production process Example - two 9" diameter fluidized bed coaters can produce 500,000 particles per day Example - bounce-pan holds 4-100 shells for coating 9" ID nuclear fuel coater

  12. Target filling and layering methods must be scaled to high throughputs Fluidized Bed Concept for Capsule Layering The first full target supply system is at OMEGA  4 filled/layered targets/day INJECT IR Tube Layering Concept for Hohlraums FLUIDIZED BED WITH GOLD PLATED (IR REFLECTING) INNER WALL ASSEMBLED HOHLRAUMS ARE STAGED IN VERTICAL TUBES WITH PRECISE TEMPERATURE CONTROL Pressure cell with trays COLD HELIUM 36 " I.D. X 40 " Tall, 8 trays, 290,000 targets .... Basic premise: develop processes so small crews can operate

  13. Anticipated target injection and tracking costs are low Target injection critical issues 1) Withstand acceleration during injection 2) Survive thermal environment 3) Accuracy and repeatability, tracking Must supply about 500, 000 targets per day for a 1000 MW(e) power plant 1) Injection placement accuracy to ±5 mm 2) Indirect/direct drive tracking and beam steering to less than ±200/20 m HYLIFE-II power plant concept showing basic injector components Direct drive target sabot .... Additional work will be needed to define injection costs

  14. Major steps to reduce IFE target manufacturing costs Current Cost Production Cost Item Per Shell ($) Cost ($) Comment Total Cost ~$2752 $0.083 Per "shot-quality" target Eliminate FOAK (R&D) $1200 ~0 Produce a fixed target design Reduce Characterization - Support R&D 225 ~0 No R&D support - Pedigree 1200 <$0.05  Process control Manufacturing Cost $0.013 -Labor (yield, batch size) 125 -Materials Cost 2 $0.02 The vast majority of the cost reductions come from eliminating R&D and the QC “pedigree” for each target. .... Additional work will be needed to define filling, layering, and injection costs

  15. Summary and conclusions Current experimental-target fabrication costs need to be reduced about four orders of magnitude for economical IFE power production Cost reductions of 104 or more from early fabrication to mass-production are common in high-tech industries Reductions from the current cost will be achieved by: - eliminating first-of-a-kind and development efforts inherent in today's experimental-targets - reducing the cost of QC by implementing statistical process control and automating inspection processes - developing equipment and processes for large batch sizes and/or continuous production - conducting the development programs necessary to achieve high product yields .... A significant development program is needed to provide low-cost mass-production of IFE targets

More Related