1 / 7

Identitas Mahasiswa

AINUR RACHTILA PUTRIANTI, 2201405592 TEACHING CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONS TO THE YEAR FIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE. Identitas Mahasiswa.

minda
Download Presentation

Identitas Mahasiswa

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AINUR RACHTILA PUTRIANTI, 2201405592TEACHING CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONS TO THE YEAR FIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE

  2. Identitas Mahasiswa • - NAMA : AINUR RACHTILA PUTRIANTI - NIM : 2201405592 - PRODI : Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris - JURUSAN : BAHASA & SASTRA INGGRIS - FAKULTAS : Bahasa dan Seni - EMAIL : putrie_anty pada domain yahoo.co.id - PEMBIMBING 1 : Dr. Abdurrachman Faridi, M.Pd. - PEMBIMBING 2 : Dra. C. Murni W., M.A - TGL UJIAN : 2010-03-29

  3. Judul • TEACHING CLASSROOM INSTRUCTIONS TO THE YEAR FIVE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENTS USING TOTAL PHYSICAL RESPONSE

  4. Abstrak • The topic of the research is teaching classroom instructions to the year five of elementary school students using total physical response of SD N Gayamsari 2 Semarang. The number of the subjects in this research was 45 students. The objectives of this study are to describe the effectivenes of TPR method in teaching classroom instructions to the year five elementary school students, to identify the improvement of English using TPR method. In collecting the data, I used tests, field notes, and questionnaire. In order to achieve the objective of this research, I designed an action research. There were two cycles in this study. Each of them consisted of five meetings. I gave some difference list of instructions in each cycle. I conducted an achievement test in the end of each cycle.There were four types of test in this action research. They were pre-test, first cycle test, and second cycle test, and post-test. The purpose of giving a test was to measure the students’ progress after the treatment given. The questions in pre-test are different from the questions in post-test, but still about classroom instructions lists. The result of this research showed that the students’ understanding of learning classroom instructions improved after they were given the treatments. It can be seen from the average result of the students’ pre-test, first cycle test, and second cycle test, and post-test which were each 59.6 %; 66.72 %; 72.22%; and 78.38 %. It means that there is a significance difference in the students’ achievements after they were given treatments. In line with the result, I suggest this activity be used to improve classroom instructions. The teacher may use it as an alternative aid to create a situation which makes the students interested in English.

  5. Kata Kunci • Total Physical Response, Elementary school, Young Learner.

  6. Referensi • Arikunto, S. 2002. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek (Edisi Revisi V). Jakarta: P.T Rineka Cipta. Asher, J. James. 2006. The Total Physical Response Approach to Learning Language. www.tprsource.com/asher.htm. Retrieved on October 20th , 2009. Brown, J.D. 1988. Understanding Research in Second Language Learning: a Teacher’s Guide to Statistic and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Cameron, Lynne. 2001. Teaching Languages to Young Learners. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Christensen, L.B. 2001. Experimental Methodology. Boston: Allyn & Bacon. Depdikbud. 2006. Kurikulum Tingkat Satuan Pendidikan SD/MI. Jakarta: Depdikbud. Harmer, Jeremy. 2001. The Practice of English Language Teaching. England: Longman. Heaton, J.B. 1979. Writing English Language Test. London: Longman Group. Kemis, S and Mc. Taggart, R. 1998. The Action Research Planner (third edition). Australia: Deakin University Press. Mujianto, Yan. 2009. Petunjuk Penulisan Skripsi. Semarang: English Department of UNNES. Nagel, Greta. 2001. Effective Grouping for Literacy Instruction. United States of America: A Pearson Education Company. Oppenhem, N.A. 1992. Questuionnaire Design Interviewing and Attitude Measurement. London: Printer Publisher. Oxford Advenced Learners Dictionary (5th Edition). Richard, Jack and Rogers. 1986. Approach and Method in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Scoot, Wendy A and Lisbeth H. Ytreberg. 1990. Teaching English to Children. New York: Longman. Saleh, M. 2001. Pengantar Praktik Penelitian Pengajaran Bahasa. Semarang: IKIP Semarang Press. Vallete, Rebecca M. 1989. Modern Language Testing. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Inc. http://library.org/content. Retrieved on November 14th, 2009. http://library.thinkquest.org/C005704/content. Retrieved on November 20th ,2009. http://www.scribd.com/doc/17626754/ktsp-kurikulum-sd-diknas. Retrieved on November 24th , 2009. www.tpr-world.com. Retrieved on November 24th , 2009.

  7. Terima Kasih • http://unnes.ac.id

More Related