130 likes | 356 Views
T-76.4115/5115 Quality Award and Course Closing Ceremony. Aalto University School of Science. Agenda. 16:15 Opening ( Prof. Tomi Männistö/SoberIT ) 16:20 Summary of the projects ( Jari Vanhanen & Timo Lehtinen/SoberIT) 16:45 Demos of the quality award candidates Hannotaatio Team 9
E N D
T-76.4115/5115Quality Award and Course Closing Ceremony Aalto University School of Science
Agenda • 16:15 Opening (Prof. Tomi Männistö/SoberIT) • 16:20 Summary of the projects (Jari Vanhanen & Timo Lehtinen/SoberIT) • 16:45 Demos of the quality award candidates • Hannotaatio • Team 9 • Team Partaveikot • 17:45 Quality award (Hanna-Kaisa Seiro/Accenture) • 18:00 – 19:45 Dinner
Educational goals – Now you should have… • better understanding on the challenges involved in commercial sw development • it is not just coding or solving technical problems … • better understanding on selecting suitable practices and tools for your future projects • and on avoiding some unsuitable ones … • gained general skills crucial for a sw development career • new technologies • management skills, social skills, presentation skills, writing skills • general project work, networking, internationalization
Changes to the course? Which concrete requirements set by the course did not contribute to the project or have educational value? • The balance between • satisfying the customer • making educational exercises in a real context • Duration of the course • two instead of three periods? • The role of the mentors • more and more SE experts have already done the project once • a stakeholder emphasizing the educational goals still needed
Course feedback form • Mandatory part of all SoberIT courses • constructive improvement ideas appreciated • Link in the course schedule • Deadline Fr 18.3.2011 • department closes all feedback forms then
The most important practices according to the teams • Working and learning together • much more efficient and motivating than distributed work/working alone • co-located team • pair programming, side-by-side programming • Iterative development • two sprints per course’s iteration
Common challenges in the projects and some possible solutions • Observations from the root cause analyses (RCA) with 11 groups • two sessions (I1 & I2) • Analyzing the causes of the problem • “It was challenging to reach the project goals” • Why?
Customer compares to the original/updated project goals some compensation if the customer caused problems to the project Mentor compares to typical projects on this course difficulty of the project +/- a few points Evaluation – Project’s results
Grades • 1-Team One 5 • 2-Team Partaveikot 5 • 3-Hannotaatio 5 • 4-MoodleMania 3 • 5-TMNT 5 • 6-Team Kuudes 4 • 7-Qknights 4 • 8-Androids 4 • 9-Team Nine 5 • 10-Aalto Anonymous 4 • 11-AFFD 4 • 12-Mixed Apples 3 • 13-Aalto Connect 4 • 14-Aalto4Good 5 • Some changes (+/-1 grade) have been done within groups Please, check carefully the correctness of your course version, credit points, and personal grade!
Työ on mielenkiintoista opettavaista palkitsevaa Työmäärä ~70t (2 ryhmää) lokakuu-helmikuu työhön tutustuminen mentor-palaverit iteraatiodemot muu ohjaus ja seuranta arvostelut ja arvostelupalaverit Mentoriksi ensi lukuvuonna?
Thank you! • Students • Customers • Mentors • All involved teachers from SoberIT • SoberIT computer administrators • Accenture