70 likes | 185 Views
draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00. Alessandro Amirante Tobia Castaldi Lorenzo Miniero Simon Pietro Romano (University of Napoli Federico II). A Control Package for BFCP. Individual contribution to deal with floor control in the MCCF When FCS co-located with the MS
E N D
draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00 Alessandro Amirante Tobia Castaldi Lorenzo Miniero Simon Pietro Romano (University of Napoli Federico II)
A Control Package for BFCP • Individual contribution to deal with floor control in the MCCF • When FCS co-located with the MS • AS co-located with the FCS doesn’t need this • No explicit milestone for this in the charter, but it is related to the mixing stuff • Parallel/complementary development with the mixing work (e.g. find additional requirements) draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00
Requirements • Need to provide the AS with means to configure and manage the moderation of a MS conference instance • Is conferencing the only target? (e.g. Push To Talk) • Need mapping of media labels with floors • Which mixed streams are available? • How to enforce decisions? • Need to support RFC4583 • Is an explicit “add participant” needed? • Need an event notification mechanism • Which events should be triggered? (apart from ‘granted/not granted anymore’…) draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00
RFC4583 Support • RFC4583 specifies a way to negotiate a BFCP connection in SIP/SDP (COMEDIA) • Also provides clients with needed info (FCS transport address, BFCP-related identifiers, etc.) • However, it assumes the FCS is already aware of the participant • Issue in signaling (INVITE precedes <join>) • Proper synchronization between 3PCC and Control Channel is needed draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00
RFC4583/3PCC v1 draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00
RFC4583/3PCC v2 draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00
Final Remarks • Is the draft on the right track? • Are more directives/events needed? • Which signaling pattern is to be preferred? • Should it be an extension of the mixing package(s), or a package on its own? • Extension mechanism still undefined • May extend optional packages • Conferencing might not be the only target • Suggestions? Comments? draft-miniero-bfcp-control-package-00