1 / 23

Nina Rohringer and Robin Santra

Characterization of statistical properties of x-ray FEL radiation by means of few-photon processes. Nina Rohringer and Robin Santra. Outline. Motivation SASE FEL Amplification starts from “Shot noise” Theoretical tools Classical and quantum mechanical field-correlation functions

mio
Download Presentation

Nina Rohringer and Robin Santra

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Characterization of statistical properties of x-ray FEL radiation by means of few-photon processes Nina Rohringer and Robin Santra

  2. Outline • Motivation • SASE FEL • Amplification starts from “Shot noise” • Theoretical tools • Classical and quantum mechanical field-correlation functions • Density matrix formalism • Quantum electrodynamics • Atomic physics • 1-photon absorption • Elastic scattering • 2-photon absorption • Characterization of FEL radiation – Feasibility study • Rate equations for Helium and Neon • Outlook

  3. Single-shot measurements of SASE FEL Field intensities and phases of the 530 nm chaotic output of a SASE FEL at Low Energy Undulator Testline (APS) Random phases and amplitudes ! Statistical description necessary Yuelin Li et al. Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 243602 (2003).

  4. Electron bunch-duration Tb Gain bandwidth Theoretical methods to predict statistical properties of SASE FEL amplification starts from “Shot Noise” Gaussian random process: random arrival times of electrons at the entrance of the undulator Simulations in the non-saturated regime: Single-shot spectrum Average over shots E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, The Physics of Free Electron Lasers, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2000). Krinsky, Gluckstern Phys. Rev. ST Accel. 6, 50701 (2003).

  5. Questions we have to ask:(1) Which statistical information of the radiation field is necessary to interpret a given experiment ?(2) Which experiments would allow to determine those relevant statistical properties of the radiation field ?

  6. Classicalfield-correlation functions 1st order time correlation function (Michelson interferometer) 1st order time-space correlation function Young’s double slit experiment 2nd order correlation function (Hanbury-Brown and Twiss experiment)

  7. Quantum mechanical field-correlation functions - quantum mechanical concept of coherence -R. J. Glauber, The quantum theory of optical coherence, Phys. Rev. 130, 2529 (1963). -P. Lambropoulos, C. Kikuchi, and R.K. Osborn, Coherence and two-photon absorption, Phys. Rev. 144, 1081 (1966). -G.S. Agarwal, Field-correlation effects in multiphoton absorption processes, Phys. Rev. A 1, 1445 (1970).

  8. atom Multi-mode density-matrix in Fock representation Final state: Statistical description by density matrix formalism Initial state:

  9. Perturbative Quantum Electrodynamics Approach H=Hatomic+HField+HI 1st and 2nd order perturbation theory in A and A2 terms to calculate transition matrix elements

  10. Atomic part Field One-photon absorption Correlations of different angles of incident radiation Generalized cross correlation function of 1st order

  11. Restriction to single propagation direction: Generalized cross correlation function of 1st order Average number of photons with frequency Spectral intensity distribution

  12. Atomic part Field One-photon single ionization

  13. Atomic part Field Elastic X-ray scattering Negligible if far from resonance

  14. Two-photon absorption negligible ? Atomic part Field

  15. Correlation Functions of coherent and chaotic single-mode radiation field Coherent-state representation of density matrix: (Glauber’s quasi-probability p-representation) Coherent field: (pure coherent state) Chaotic field:

  16. Intensity distribution: 1-dimensional classical models of SASE FEL Predictions Relation of higher-order to 1st order correlation functions (Generalized Siegert Relations) E. L. Saldin, E. A. Schneidmiller, and M. V. Yurkov, The Physics of Free Electron Lasers, (Springer-Verlag, Berlin 2000). S. Krinsky and R.L. Gluckstern,Phys. Rev. ST Accel. 6, 50701 (2003). C. B. Schroeder, C. Pellegrini, and P. Chen, Phys. Rev. E 64, 56502 (2001). S. O. Rice, Bell Syst. Tech. J 24, 46 (1945).

  17. In principle,only first order correlation function G1 is needed!ButExperimental verification needed.

  18. Feasibility Study for Helium and NeonRate-equations Gaussian pulse envelope Helium: Neon: Auger-decay and valence-shell ionization included

  19. Helium transition probabilities in dependence of intensity Rate equations for Gaussian-shaped pulse

  20. 1mm 0.5 mm 0.25 mm He+ 1.7d7 3.9d6 6.9d5 He++ sequ. 3.2d3 2.8d3 1.7d3 He++ corr. 4.4d51.d5 1.8d4 Expected experimental event rates pulse-duration 100 fs energy 1.4 keV repetition rate 120 Hz photons/pulse 5. 1012 gas density 1014 cm-3 Helium not suitable,…

  21. Neon transition probabilities in dependence of intensity

  22. 2.5mm 2 mm 1 mm Ne2+ 3.8d9 5.2d8 5.4d2 Ne4+5.0d9 1.1d9 5.4d3 Ne6+ 4.8d9 1.9d9 1.1d5 Ne8+ 3.1d9 2.1d9 3.6d7 Ne9+ 1.2d9 1.5d9 1.3d7 Ne10+ 2.1d8 8.3d8 4.9d8 Expected experimental event rates pulse-duration 100 energy 1.4 keV repetition rate 120 Hz photons/pulse 5. 1012 gas density 1014 cm-3

  23. Conclusions and Outlook • Density matrix approach for statistical treatment of radiation field • Perturbative quantum electrodynamics approach • For few photon processes: • Shot to shot characterization of radiation field not necessary • Necessary information: generalized correlation functions of the radiation field • Low order correlation functions could in principle be determined by means of single- and double ionization of well-studied atomic systems • Theoretical Challenges: • Accurate atomic matrix-elements for elementary processes needed • Inversion problem

More Related