70 likes | 164 Views
PREPARING & REVIEWING PROPOSALS. John Lie University of California, Berkeley July 2012. Proposal vs. Paper. Promise vs. Achievement Distinct modalities of “human sciences” Continuing national differences Disciplinary diversity Stylistic / methodological diversity
E N D
PREPARING & REVIEWING PROPOSALS John Lie University of California, Berkeley July2012
Proposal vs. Paper • Promise vs. Achievement • Distinct modalities of “human sciences” • Continuing national differences • Disciplinary diversity • Stylistic / methodological diversity • Statistical, historical, interview etc. • Nonetheless, a common grammar
Commonalities • Problematic / Topic • Review of the Literature • Thesis / Argument • Methods / Data • Budget, Schedule • Impact, Dissemination • More abstractly: • Originality • Feasibility • Quality
Sources of Excellence • Originality Mastery & Emulation • Feasibility Experience • Quality Exposure • Practically speaking: • Read widely and deeply • Work diligently (10 years / 10,000 hours) • Seek expertise • In Kazakhstan?
General Recommendations • Preparation • Nothing like mastery of one’s field/sub-field, relevant methods etc. • “Push the Envelope” • Theoretical, Methodological, Substantive (Empirical) • Conceptual importation (“ideas that travel”) • Proposal and (the Final) Paper • The short distance between promise and achievement • In short: important to take it seriously
“Think Like A Fish” • The Reviewer & The Reviewed • The Painter & The Studio • Tacit Knowledge • The Point of Post-graduate Education • Structure of Scientific Innovation (& Hierarchy) • Opaque Culture of Review & Publication
Recommendations for the Review Process • Additional information • Scholarly track record • Triage • Some proposals clearly sub-standard • Summary recommendation • “the bottom line” • The whole can be greater than its constituents • Final selection • Common to have an executive committee • Staff enhancement • A key to US success