1 / 16

SCAMPI Review

SCAMPI Review. WP6: Project Management 3r d Annual Review of Project CNET-ICT-258414 Beaulieu, Brussels, Belgium 26 November, 2013. Overview. WP6 objectives and achievements in year 3 An overview of resources’ consumption Final observations Q/A at any time. WP6: Project management.

mira
Download Presentation

SCAMPI Review

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCAMPI Review WP6: Project Management 3rd Annual Review of Project CNET-ICT-258414 Beaulieu, Brussels, Belgium 26 November, 2013

  2. Overview • WP6 objectives and achievements in year 3 • An overview of resources’ consumption • Final observations • Q/A at any time

  3. WP6: Project management • WP6 mission: • Provide internal project management and ensure that the overall co-ordination of objectives is met within the conditions of time, budget, control, effectiveness and quality of output. • Represent the contact point of the project to the EC, the FP7 community and the external world. • Participants: Aalto (coordinator), Martel • Person Months: 19 PMs planned, 19.4 PMs consumed in total in WP6

  4. Objectives for year 3 Ensure follow up on year 2 review Supervise administrative procedures Control the quality of the project outcomes Monitor and report on efforts consumption Facilitate partners’ interactions Contribute to organization of project meetings Ensure close coordination with the EC Coordinate preparation for final review

  5. Achievements for year 3 • Supervised the follow up on Y2 review‘s reccomendations • All project milestones and deliverables reached and released as planned • Smooth and effective partners‘ coordination • Fine-grained control of resources through • Periodic quarterly reports • Deliverable 6.4 – 3rd Periodic Report • Good communication with the Project Officer

  6. About the 3rd PPR (D6.4) Year 3 ended 30 September 2013 D6.4 v1.0 delivered couple of weeks ago: We could collect all partners PMs‘ expenditures figures Consolidated financial figures for all partners available but: Problems with the NEF in finalizing C Forms for Futurice ETHZ waiting for final confirmation on financial figures from auditor The C Form figures might slightly change mainly due to the additional costs related to the final review Because of that we agreed with the PO not to submit the NEF session An updated version of D6.4 shall be released and NEF session submitted within the next two weeks

  7. PMs overview 361.8 PMs 317.3 PMs

  8. About Costs Actual figures for overall project duration: For a total of 361.8 PMs spent by the SCAMPI consortium: Total Costs = € 3’857’635 Requested EC contribution = € 2’884’793 Planned figures for overall project duration: For a total of 317.3 PMs planned during the whole project duration: Total Costs = € 3’640’290 Requested EC Contribution = € 2’759’549 Over-expenditures for some partners: CHF/EUR

  9. Deliverables year 3

  10. Deliverables year 3

  11. Milestones year 3

  12. Conclusions SCAMPI has been a succesful project and important results have been already obtained In this last project year: We consolidated and completed our work as planned according also to the reviewers‘ feedback We moved SCAMPI implementations towards product grade Continued dissemination of results and promoted the visibility of the SCAMPI project Broadly promoted the uptake of SCAMPI concepts and technologies

  13. Thank you for your attention and precious feedback and comments!

  14. PMs Year 3 actual vs `planned´

  15. PMs per work package

  16. PMs per partner

More Related