1 / 15

Variability of CH 2 O during ICARTT: Implications for GOME/OMI

Variability of CH 2 O during ICARTT: Implications for GOME/OMI. Dylan Millet. GEOS-CHEM Users’ Meeting April 2005. Use ICARTT flight data to address: Satellite retrievals Is GEOS-CHEM accurately representing the CH 2 O vertical profile (shape factor)?

Download Presentation

Variability of CH 2 O during ICARTT: Implications for GOME/OMI

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Variability of CH2O during ICARTT:Implications for GOME/OMI Dylan Millet GEOS-CHEM Users’ Meeting April 2005 GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  2. Use ICARTT flight data to address: • Satellite retrievals • Is GEOS-CHEM accurately representing the CH2O vertical profile (shape factor)? • What is the uncertainty/bias in the AMF? • Variability in CH2O • What are the dominant sources of CH2O over N.A.? • Implications for satellite retrievals? GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  3. Air Mass Factor AMFG: Geometric factor w(s): Scattering weights ~ -(lnIB)/ t S(s): Shape factor Normalized vertical distribution From model AMF: Slant column / vertical column dt

  4. Vertical Profile Comparison All profiles E. U.S. Atlantic GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  5. Clear Sky AMF Comparison- all profiles - Small negative bias (-6%) in modeled clear sky AMF GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  6. Continental profiles: -7% Oceanic profiles: +5% GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  7. Cloudy AMF Comparison Clouds: Can act to increase or decrease sensitivity of measurement GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  8. Cloudy AMF Comparison Actual cloud profile: Retrieved cloud: GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  9. Cloudy AMF Comparison Accounting for clouds: Small negative bias persists, larger spread GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  10. Continental profiles: -17% Oceanic profiles: +3% GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  11. CH2O Sources & Variability GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  12. CH2O Sources Importance of measured precursors to CH2O production: GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  13. CH2O Sources GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  14. CH2O Sources Continental boundary layer: • Continental BL: • P(isoprene) ~ 50% of P(total) on average • OVOCs, methane important • Variability in P(isoprene) > 10x P(others) GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

  15. Conclusions • Error in AMF: • Uncertainty of ±30% (2s) for an individual clear-sky scene (higher for cloudy-sky) • Mean bias ~ -7% continental clear-sky; -17% continental cloudy-sky • Sources of CH2O: • Isoprene, OVOC, methane dominant sources over N.A. • Variability in isoprene source > 10x that of other sources GEOS-CHEM Meeting 2005

More Related