1 / 21

Chapter 14 Market-Oriented Resource Management and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Survey

Chapter 14 Market-Oriented Resource Management and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Survey. By Saurabh Kumar Garg & Rajkumar Buyya. A view of market-oriented grid pushing grid into mainstream computing. Utility Grids and Preliminaries. Main Participants of Utility Grid.

miriam
Download Presentation

Chapter 14 Market-Oriented Resource Management and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Survey

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Chapter 14Market-Oriented Resource Management and Scheduling: A Taxonomy and Survey By Saurabh Kumar Garg & Rajkumar Buyya

  2. A view of market-oriented grid pushing grid into mainstream computing

  3. Utility Grids and Preliminaries

  4. Main Participants of Utility Grid • Grid Service Consumers (GSCs) • Grid Service Providers (GSPs) • Grid Market Exchange • Grid Market Directories • Trading Mechanism • Accounting

  5. Utility Grid: Infrastructural View

  6. Utility Grid: Infrastructural View • Lowest Layer • Grid Fabric • Physical Infrastructure • Core Middleware • Hides underline hetrogeniety • Job submission • Market-oriented Component for Provider • Security Services

  7. Utility Grid: Infrastructural View • Grid Market Exchange • Auction and Clearing house Faciltiy • Services to enable trading between consumers and providers, such as Grid Bank, GMD etc • Reputation System

  8. Utility Grid: Infrastructural View • User Side Infrastructure • Portal to submit Grid Applications and requirements • Programming language tools • Resource Management tools • Market-oriented scheduling mechanisms to participate in utility grid.

  9. Requirements(Consumer Side) • User-centric Brokers • Bidding/Valuation Mechanism • Market-oriented Scheduling Mechanisms • Allocation of Multiple Resources • Estimation of Resource Usage

  10. Requirements(Resource Side) • Resource Management Systems • Pricing/Valuation Mechanism • Admission Control and Negotiation Protocols • Commoditization of the Resources

  11. Requirements(Market Side) • An Information and Market Directory • Support for Different Market Models • Reputation and Monitoring System • Banking system (Accounting, Billing, Payment mechanism) • Meta-scheduling/Meta-Brokering • Currency Management • Security and Legal System

  12. TAXONOMY OF MARKET-ORIENTED SCHEDULING • Market-Based Scheduling Mechanism can be broadly catagorizes into Five Components • Based on the resource allocation decision • Based on the objective of the scheduling • Based on the Market Model used for trading • Based on the Application Model for which mechanism is developed • Based on the participant for whom mechanism is designed

  13. TAXONOMY OF MARKET-ORIENTED SCHEDULING

  14. GRID RESOURCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS • Can be Catagorized into two • Market Based-Schedulers • System Based-Schedulers

  15. Market-Oriented Schedulers • User Side • Gridbus Broker(UB) • Nimrod-G • Provider Side • Tycoon (RMS) • Spawn (RMS) • Bellagio (RMS) • Sharp (RMS) • Mariposa (RMS) • GRIA (RMS) • PeerMart (RMS)

  16. Market-Oriented Schedulers • Market Exchange System • Shirako (I) • OCEAN (I) • CatNets (I) • SORMA (I) • GridEcon (I) • G-Commerce

  17. System-based Schedulers • Community Scheduler Framework (CSF) • Computing Centre Software (CCS) • GridWay • Maob (Silver) • Condor/G • Grubber/Di-Grubber • eNanos • APST

  18. Gap Analysis(Scheduling Mechanisms) • Support for Multiple QoS Parameters • Support for Different Application Type • Support for Market-oriented Meta-scheduling Mechanisms

  19. Gap Analysis(Market Based Systems) • User Level Middleware • flexibility for user to trade resources in any market • Automatic Bidding System • Provider ‘s Resource Management Systems • Current System based scheduler needs to be extended to allow provider to participate in market exchange • SLA Monitoring • Support for advanced job models such as parallel applications and workflow

  20. Gap Analysis(Market Side) • Market Exchange • Negotiation • Allow trading between multiple users and providers • Scalable • A reputation system • Support for multiple trading/negotiation policy

  21. Conclusion • Presents the Requirements of Utility grid from each participant point of view • All the current state-of-art is catagorized using a Taxonomy. • Survey of both system and market-oriented scheduler is presented and compared to map the requirements and understand the future directions • Future directions are presented after this comprehensive analysis of current state-of-art.

More Related