1 / 18

Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010

Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010. The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus – Johnson et al, 2004 Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of smoke aerosols over clouds – Wilcox, 2012.

miriam
Download Presentation

Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol – Wilcox, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Stratocumulus cloud thickening beneath layers of absorbing smoke aerosol– Wilcox, 2010 The semi-direct aerosol effect: Impact of absorbing aerosols on marine stratocumulus – Johnson et al, 2004 Direct and semi-direct radiative forcing of smoke aerosols over clouds – Wilcox, 2012 YemiAdebiyi

  2. Overview Aerosols are advected from the adjacent Africa continent over the Atlantic Ocean’s stratocumulus cloud; typically between 2-5km

  3. AIRS air temperature is collocated with AMSR-E SST and OMI AI • MODIS is used to identify grid cells that are completely spanned by clouds. • These grid cells are collocated with AMSR-E LWP = 47,000 grid cells

  4. Shortwave heating rate • The SW heating rate increases with increase in AOD • Due to the increase absorption of SW within the layer • SW heating rate increases with cloud fraction. • Due to absorption of both down-welling and upwelling SW within the layer

  5. How much will this corresponds to on a global scale?

  6. How does the upper level respond to changes in SST for diff. AI? How much connection is there between SST and midlevel air temp. variation? • At 700hPa, high smoke samples are warmer than low smoke samples by nearly 1K. • He reported no systematic difference at 600hPa, except 30% of samples below 293K SST which shows cooler T for higher AI

  7. Cloud thickening effect • Increase SW absorption in smoke layer • Leading to increase in buoyancy of layer above the cloud • Reduced cloud-top entrainment • This preserves the humidity and cloud cover in BL • Result = Increased LWP and shallower BL Negative semi-direct forcing

  8. Putting Aerosol above cloud in LES Simulation

  9. Aerosol within the BL in LES • Aerosol heats the cloud layer • Leading to daytime thinning of cloud • Increase evaporation enhances daytime decoupling of BL • …and hence reduced turbulent fluxes between surface and cloud • Result = decreased LWP Positive semi-direct forcing

  10. Sharp longwave cooling near cloud-top • Leads to sinking parcels due to buoyancy • Increases turbulent mixing at cloud-top that entrains free tropospheric air into the BL. • Entrainment dries the BL and reduced LWP • Lower LWP then lowers entrainment = negative feedback

  11. Evidence of possible non-linearity

  12. How does the radiative forcing change if elevated smoke layer has moisture?

  13. Using Observation Direct radiative warming of smoke above the cloud

  14. Semi-direct radiative cooling by cloud thickening

  15. Summary • Absorbing aerosol layer above cloud leads to warming due to absorption of SW radiation • This warming is increased due to additional component reflected by the underlying cloud • Aerosol above the cloud enhances buoyancy which reduces entrainment and thus increases LWP and hence albedo! • The semi-direct cooling due to cloud thickening is capable of compensating for more than 60% of the warming by direct effect. • What remain to be accessed is the impact of moistened smoke layer on the direct and semi-direct radiative forcing.

More Related