1 / 22

The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup - An Introduction

The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup - An Introduction. Toby J.F. Bishop CFE CPA FCA President & Chief Executive Officer Association of Certified Fraud Examiners. Current Fraud Concerns. Fraudulent financial reporting Legal risks for executives Civil liability

misha
Download Presentation

The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup - An Introduction

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup- An Introduction Toby J.F. Bishop CFE CPA FCA President & Chief Executive Officer Association of Certified Fraud Examiners

  2. Current Fraud Concerns • Fraudulent financial reporting • Legal risks for executives • Civil liability • Criminal (jail time) • Financial losses for investors • Reputation damage to companies/brands • Crisis of confidence

  3. An Appropriate Response • Fraud prevention is 80% of the solution • Objective evaluation of an entity’s fraud prevention processes • Prompt action to fix gaps/breakdowns • Annual testing • Ongoing fraud education and training

  4. The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup • A high-level checkup of an entity’s fraud prevention processes • Form available free at www.CFEnet.com • Identifies major gaps • Provides an overall score

  5. Benefits to Entities That Use This Tool • It provides insights that senior management, the board of directors and audit committee will value highly • It could save the entity from catastrophic financial and reputational losses • It could help build confidence in the entity internally and by the public • It’s simple and inexpensive

  6. Benefits for CFEs Who Apply This Tool • It provides insights that senior management, boards of directors and audit committees will value highly • It can be performed very inexpensively • It can help you win new clients and deepen existing relationships • It is being promoted in the media by the ACFE

  7. But CFEs Should Manage Their Liability Risks • Risk of false perception of assurance • Be careful not to guarantee “no fraud” • Anti-fraud controls in existence vs. operating effectively • Ongoing frauds may be uncovered • Legal risks to entity evaluated if control gaps are identified but not fixed

  8. Who Should Perform the Checkup? • Ideally a collaboration between a Certified Fraud Examiner and knowledgeable people inside the entity (e.g., internal auditors) • Helpful to interview senior management • But also talk to other levels of employees to get a reality check

  9. The Certified Fraud Examiners’ Fraud Prevention Checkup • The seven elements: • Fraud risk oversight (20 pts) • Fraud risk ownership (10 pts) • Fraud risk assessment (10 pts) • Fraud risk tolerance and risk management policy (10 pts) • Process level controls/anti-fraud re-engineering (10 pts) • Environment level controls (30 pts) • Proactive fraud detection (10 pts)

  10. Fraud Risk Oversight • To what extent has the entity established a process for oversight of fraud risks by the board of directors or others charged with governance (e.g., an audit committee)?

  11. Scoring – Risk Oversight • Score: Award from 0 (process not in place) to 20 points (process fully implemented, tested within the past year and working effectively). • Note: For all questions, award no more than half the available points if the process has not been tested within the past year.

  12. Fraud Risk Ownership • To what extent has the entity created “ownership” of fraud risks…? • Chief Executive currently “owns” the risk, but needs to make others responsible too • A member of senior management, and • All business unit managers

  13. Fraud Risk Assessment • To what extent has the entity created an ongoingprocess for identifying the significant fraud risks to which the entity is exposed? • Potentially catastrophic risks • Costly risks • Tailored to the particular entity • Can be part of enterprise risk management

  14. Fraud Risk Tolerance and Risk Management Policy • To what extent has the entity identified and had approved by the board of directors: • Its tolerance for different types of fraud risks? • A policy on how it will manage its fraud risks? • Align risk tolerance of management with that of board of directors & audit committee • Business decisions to reduce fraud risks

  15. Process Level Controls/Anti-Fraud Re-engineering • To what extent has the entity implemented measures to reduce each of the significant fraud risks identified in its risk assessment, through: • Anti-fraud process re-engineering (removing the opportunity)? • Process level controls to prevent, deter and detect fraud

  16. Environment Level Anti-Fraud Controls • To what extent has the entity implemented a process to promote ethical decisions, deter wrongdoing and facilitate two-way communication on difficult issues? • Most difficult area to evaluate • Difference between existence and operating effectiveness of controls can be crucial • Employee surveys are highly desirable

  17. Key Elements of Environment Level Controls • Senior member of management responsible • Values-based code of conduct • Regular training (including fraud) • Advice and reporting systems • Investigation plans • Monitoring of compliance

  18. Key Elements of Environment Level Controls • Regular measurement of achievement of ethics/compliance and fraud prevention goals • Employee attitude surveys, fraud measures • Incorporate ethics/compliance and fraud prevention goals into performance measures for evaluating/compensating employees

  19. Proactive Fraud Detection • To what extent has the entity established a process to detect, investigate and resolve potentially significant fraud? • Proactive fraud detection testing • Targeted at significant fraud risks identified in the fraud risk assessment • Embedded fraud detection/audit “hooks” • Automated e-mail monitoring (where legal)

  20. Interpreting the Entity’s Overall Score • Desirable score is 100 points • Most entities will fall short initially • Not currently considered a “material weakness in internal controls” that is a reportable condition • But significant gaps should be closed promptly to avoid disaster

  21. Recommended Next Steps • Study the ACFE Fraud Prevention Checkup • Promote it to your current and target clients • Perform checkups and identify major gaps in clients’ fraud prevention processes • Providing anti-fraud consulting services to help clients fix those gaps

  22. Thank You • Any questions? • ACFE Fraud Prevention Checkup pdf file available at www.CFEnet.com. PowerPoint presentation available to members shortly. • +1 (512) 478-9070

More Related