1 / 34

ITIL @ Deakin

ITIL @ Deakin. Richard Tan Head, Information Technology Services Division DEAKIN UNIVERSITY 14 th October 2003. Overview. Some Background Why ITIL? What are we doing? How did we get here? What are our timeframes? How are we doing it? Awareness & Training Tools, what tools?.

misu
Download Presentation

ITIL @ Deakin

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. ITIL @ Deakin Richard Tan Head, Information Technology Services Division DEAKIN UNIVERSITY 14th October 2003

  2. Overview Some Background Why ITIL? What are we doing? How did we get here? What are our timeframes? How are we doing it? Awareness & Training Tools, what tools?

  3. Some Background Service Review Committee (SRC) Service Review Conference Service Catalogue What about Service Delivery? What about Service Support? We Needed a Framework

  4. Why ITIL? Selection Process ITIL Framework Common Sense & Practical Non-Proprietary Public Domain BS15000 Specification for IT Service Management Implementation Partner Demonstrated ITIL Knowledge & Experience Training, Advice & Consulting Services ProActive were chosen

  5. What are our timeframes? Overall Service Improvement Programme 3 years… Don’t underestimate!!! It will take that long Implementation Stages Service Review – December 2001 Framework Selection – January 2002 Assessment – March 2002 Programme Definition – May 2002 Programme Initiation – August 2002 Programme Review – October 2004

  6. How did we get here? Base 1 - Assessment Process Maturity Report

  7. How did we get here? Efficiency and Effectiveness

  8. How did we get here? Overall Assessment (40%)

  9. How did we get here? ITSMF Membership Service Improvement Workshop Service Improvement Programme (SIP) ITIL Leadership Group ITSMF Conferences Engaged Project Manager Programme Planning Workshop Created SIP Project Concept Proposals (PCPs)

  10. What SIP PCPs? Scope of Implementation Incident Management Help Desk/Service Desk Service Level Management Problem Management Change Management Configuration Management Automation of Processes (Tools)

  11. How did we get here? Project Workshops for each process More Training PCPs Created Incident Management/Service Desk Service Level Management Change Management Funding Proposal

  12. Incident Management/ Service Desk Key Objectives (1) To develop processes which are aligned with the ITIL (IT Infrastructure Library) Service Support framework and achieve measurable improvements in the areas of Service Desk and Incident Management These improvements will be measured in a number of ways, the main ones being by way of surveys and benchmarks of the length of time incidents are open

  13. Incident Management/ Service Desk Key Objectives (2) A regular 6 monthly maturity check will also be conducted to monitor our progress against the best practice maturity levels, with a goal of reaching a maturity level of 2.5 for Incident Management by the closure of this project It is also the objective of this project to enable the provision of better business information

  14. Incident Management/ Service Desk Tasks and Deliverables (1) Mapping and documentation of Incident Management and Service Desk process lifecycles Procedures supporting the incident management and service desk process lifecycles Standard process creation and review procedures and templates

  15. Incident Management/ Service Desk Tasks and Deliverables (2) Schedule of ongoing process improvement reviews Documented baselines and metrics An ITIL aligned Service Desk

  16. Service Level Management Key Objectives (1) To develop processes which are aligned with the ITIL (IT Infrastructure Library) Service Support & Delivery framework and achieve measurable improvements in the area of Service Level Management and an increased ability to manage the expectations of customers and vendors

  17. Service Level Management Key Objectives (2) These improvements will be measured in a number of ways, the main ones being by way of Service Level Agreements and process maturity. Service Level Agreements and Operational Level Agreements will be formed and agreed with key stakeholders

  18. Service Level Management Key Objectives (3) A regular 6 monthly maturity check will also be conducted to monitor our progress against the best practice maturity levels, with a goal of reaching a maturity level of 4 for Service Level Management by the closure of this project

  19. Service Level Management Key Objectives (4) Ensure that all services have defined metrics, measures with which to provide useful business information Establish a mechanism to measure and report on Service Performance and put in place a process to review all services

  20. Service Level Management Tasks and Deliverables (1) Mapping and documentation of Service Level Management process lifecycle Identify and document procedures required by each section to support the process Ensure that the accepted ITS Process creation and improvement model is followed

  21. Service Level Management Tasks and Deliverables (2) Establish business reporting requirements and implement Implement continuous improvement process A Service Catalogue A standard Service Level Agreement Template A standard Operational Level Agreement Template A negotiated SLA with the VP(A) Negotiated OLAs which underpin the SLA

  22. How are we doing it? Programme Management ITIL Champion Leadership Group Project Manager Business Analyst Projects Management Formal Methodology Project Structure Process Owners Project Teams

  23. How are we doing it? IT Governance Policy Definition Prescribed Processes Process Definition Process Change Management Not sure what you want here…

  24. Service Level Management Definition of a Service “A grouping of IT functions that provide a definitive outcome for customers”

  25. Service Level Management Service Listing

  26. Service Level Management Service Offerings Currently being prepared SLM Project Team Members First cut prepared Process Definition underway Templates published

  27. Service Level Management Timeframes Service Catalogue October 2003 OLAs & Underpinning Contracts October, 2003 Automation Requirements October, 2003 SIP Timetable November, 2003 SLA with Vice-President (Administration) December, 2003

  28. Incident Management/ Service Desk Project Plan developed Project Team assembled Process Definition underway Templates published

  29. Awareness Campaign Leadership Group Formal Communications Plan Communications Officer

  30. Awareness Campaign Internal Service Management Essentials Training (Including an exam!) 75% of all staff so far 100% by March 2004 Manager Training (A tougher exam!!!) Procurement of the books – It IS a Library Encouragement to implement in small teams ITIL Web Site Fortnightly Reports Regular “All ITS Staff” Briefings

  31. Awareness Campaign External Regular postings to University Newsletter Client Forums IT Managers DUITEs Other Universities Knowledge & Experience Sharing Forums VDIT CAUDIT EDUCAUSE SPUSC Public Forums ITSMF Conferences

  32. Tools, what tools? Currently help.deakin Work Request System Internally developed & maintained Integrated with User Management System During the Projects Requirement identification Some Enhancements to help.deakin Configuration Management system development

  33. Tools, what tools? Eventually Compile all requirements All ITIL Processes Analysis of technology base Expansion to entire University Call for Tenders Cost/Benefit Analysis Full redevelopment or Purchase

  34. ITIL @ Deakin Questions?

More Related