1 / 24

Analysis & interpretation of evidence

Analysis & interpretation of evidence. Which scenario presents a stronger case for DO causing impairment?. Hypothesis testing: a simple scenario. SCENARIO 1 DO measured upstream & downstream over 9 months Upstream = 9.3 mg/L Downstream = 8.4 mg/L Difference significant at P<0.05.

miya
Download Presentation

Analysis & interpretation of evidence

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Analysis & interpretation of evidence

  2. Which scenario presents a stronger case for DO causing impairment? Hypothesis testing: a simple scenario • SCENARIO 1 • DO measured upstream & downstream over 9 months • Upstream = 9.3 mg/L • Downstream = 8.4 mg/L • Difference significant at P<0.05 • SCENARIO 2 • DO measured upstream & downstream over 3 months • Upstream = 7.9 mg/L • Downstream = 4.2 mg/L • Difference not significant at P<0.05

  3. Using statistics responsibly • Use caution in interpreting differences • Look at magnitude & consistency of differences, rather than statistical significance • Statistical significance detects differences exceeding natural variance • Does not detect stressor effects • Does not equal biological significance • Can use statistics, but also use your head • Consider the relationship between minimum detectable difference (power) & the biologically relevant difference

  4. Use allavailable types of evidence to make an inferential assessment • Types of evidence using data from the case • Spatial/temporal co-occurrence • Evidence of exposure or biological mechanism • Causal pathway • Stressor-response relationships from the field • Manipulation of exposure • Laboratory tests of site media • Temporal sequence • Verified predictions • Symptoms • Types of evidence using data from elsewhere • Stressor-response relationships from other field studies • Stressor-response relationships from laboratory studies • Stressor-response relationships from ecological simulation models • Mechanistically plausible cause • Manipulation of exposure at other sites • Analogous stressors italics indicates commonly available types of evidence

  5. That said, graphs & statistics can help a lot…

  6. Sampling/data collection issues • Want to collect candidate cause & biological response variables at same sites, at same times • Want to time sampling to accurately assess exposures • For continuous exposures, try to catch sensitive life stages & conditions that enhance exposure or effects • For episodic exposures, try to characterize episodes through continuous, event, and post-event sampling • Want to collect good reference comparisons, in space & time • At unimpaired sites, at same times you sample impaired sites

  7. Begin with data exploration • Want to examine relationships between different variables • Linear & more complex • Expected & unexpected • 1st step is visualizing data • Scatterplots & boxplots • No statistics, hypotheses, or p-values

  8. Be sure to look at your data… • Do these data support or weaken the case for low dissolved oxygen as a candidate cause? • What type of evidence do the data represent?

  9. Boxplots • Depict distribution of observations • Center box indicates spread of 50% of observations • Whiskers indicate either max & min values, or 1.5X the interquartile range • Good data exploration & visualization tool • Can be used to evaluate data from case & data from elsewhere • Spatial/temporal co-occurrence • Stressor-response relationships from the field & from other field studies • Causal pathway

  10. Conductivity (uS/cm) Scatterplots • Graphical displays of matched data • Dependent variable (y-axis) vs. independent variable (x-axis) • Often dependent variable is biological response, independent variable is measure of candidate cause • Good data exploration & visualization tool • Can view several at once in scatterplot matrix • Can be used to evaluate data from case & from elsewhere • Stressor-response relationships from the field, from other field studies, & from laboratory studies • Causal pathway

  11. reference site EPT taxa richness impaired site Maximum summer water temperature (˚C) Example: scatterplot • Do the data support or weaken the case for temperature as a candidate cause? • What type(s) of evidence do these data provide?

  12. Correlation analysis • Method for measuring degree of association between 2 variables in a matched data set • Correlation coefficient provides quantitative measure of degree to which 2 variables co-vary • Good data exploration tool • Can be used to evaluate data from case • Stressor-response relationships from the field • Causal pathway

  13. Regression analysis • Method for quantifying relationship between dependent & independent variable • Can have ≥ 1 independent variables • Models can be used to: • Predict value of response variable for new values of explanatory variable • Estimate value of explanatory variable needed to account for change in response variable • Model natural variation in stressors, to define reference expectations 90th percentile prediction limits

  14. Quantile regression • Models relationship between specified quantile of response variable and explanatory variable (stressor) • 50th quantile gives median line, under which 50% of observed responses occur • 90th quantile gives line under which 90% of observed responses occur • Provides means of estimating location of upper boundary on scatterplot • Used to evaluate stressor-response relationships from other field studies (Step 4: Evaluating data from elsewhere)

  15. WEAKENS SUPPORTS Applying quantile regression

  16. Predicting environmental conditions from biological observations (PECBO) • Uses taxa list & niche characteristics to predict environmental conditions at site Predicted temperature if both Ameletus & Diphetor are present at site • Maximum likelihood inference based on taxon-environment relationships • Useful when environmental data not available Ameletus Diphetor

  17. Using PECBO to verify predictions • Biologically-based predictions can provide valuable supporting evidence, under “Verified predictions” • If stressor elevated at site, can test hypothesis that biologically-based prediction should also be elevated • Tools for calculating taxon-environmental relationships & PECBO available on CADDIS R2 = 0.67

  18. Species sensitivity distributions (SSDs) An SSD is a statistical distribution describing the variation of responses of a set of species to a stressor; it can be used to estimate the proportion of species adversely affected at a given stressor intensity. SSD plot showing LC50s for arthropods exposed to dissolved cadmium

  19. Data analysis tools • Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) generator • Tool that calculates & plots proportion of species affected at different levels of exposure in laboratory toxicity tests

  20. Data analysis tools • Species sensitivity distribution (SSD) generator • Tool that calculates & plots proportion of species affected at different levels of exposure in laboratory toxicity tests • Command-line R scripts • Powerful and free statistical package [http://www.r-project.org/] • R scripts provided for PECBO • CADStat • Menu-driven package of data visualization & statistical techniques, based on JGR (Java GUI for R)

  21. CADStat

  22. CADStat is based on R • R is a powerful and free statistical package [http://www.r-project.org/] • Provides flexible plotting algorithms & libraries for running virtually any statistical analysis • It’s run at the command line, so there’s a steep learning curve

  23. Making R easier • A Graphical User Interface (GUI) has been developed for R • Java GUI for R (JGR) • provides point-and-click interface for basic R functions • CADStat adds several tools to JGR • point-and-click interfaces for statistical tools useful in causal analysis • rendering of analysis results in browser window • additional help files

More Related