1 / 15

Numerical Calculations of Field Enhancements due to Small Grooves

Numerical Calculations of Field Enhancements due to Small Grooves. Tetsuo ABE (KEK) 5 th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program @SLAC, USA 2011-05-18. (v2011.02). Computation of RF Fields by CST-MWS ~ Geometry and Definition ~.

miyo
Download Presentation

Numerical Calculations of Field Enhancements due to Small Grooves

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Numerical Calculations ofField Enhancementsdue to Small Grooves Tetsuo ABE (KEK) 5th Collaboration Meeting on X-band Accelerator Structure Design and Test Program @SLAC, USA 2011-05-18

  2. (v2011.02) Computation of RF Fields by CST-MWS~ Geometry and Definition ~ e.g. Gap=20mm, D=30mm Rectangular Waveguide with fcutoff(TE10)= 10 GHz 1.0mm 15.0mm 3 Parameters to Describe the Groove Gap ~ D Simulating: - Chamfer of the Quadrants - etc. R=50mm (fixed)

  3. FDSolver.Method "Hexahedral Mesh" Mesh.MeshType "PBA" ‘(Perfect Boundary Approx.) Mesh.LinesPerWavelength “300" Mesh.AutomeshRefineAtPecLines "True", “RAPL" FDSolver.AccuracyHex "1e-6" Meshing ParametersandMesh-Size Dependence RAPL=2(default) RAPL=5 R=50mm

  4. Using a function: “GetFieldVectorSurface()”  Better field interpolation scheme on PEC surfaces RAPL=2 (default) (PEC) (Vac) X (X<0 ) 0 (X>0)

  5. RAPL=5(Adopted) (PEC) (Vac) Emax X (X<0 ) 0 (X>0)

  6. Results Gap D R=50mm

  7. Check the Results(1): E-Static Fields by CST-EMS (v2011.02) 10.0mm 1.0mm 3 Parameters to describe the groove Gap ~ D R=50mm (fixed)

  8. EStaticSolver.Method "Hexahedral Mesh" Mesh.MeshType "PBA" ‘(Perfect Boundary Approx.) Mesh. MinimumStepNumber “100" Mesh.AutomeshRefineAtPecLines "True", “RAPL" EStaticSolver.Accuracy "1e-9" Meshing ParametersandMesh-Size Dependence RAPL=2(default) RAPL=5 R=50mm

  9. RAPL=5(Adopted) (PEC) (Vac) Emax

  10. Comparison of the Results~Cross-Check of the Computations~ Good Agreements as expected

  11. Check the Results(2): Simulation using Omega3P (by Zenghai Li) D Fairly Good Agreements

  12. Magnetic Field Enhancement e.g. R=50mm, Gap=20mm, D=30mm TE10-like Mode

  13. Conclusions • Field enhancements due to small grooves with round chamfers have been computed by using CST-MWS/EMS. • At least 20% enhancement for R=50mm round chamfers. • Increases to 40% enhancement as the D size increases to 25mm. • More simulation studies to be done • Conductor surfaces damaged by BD/discharge • Etc.

  14. End of the Slides

More Related