360 likes | 610 Views
Infections in HSCT. Meng Yao Lu Department of Pediatrics National Taiwan University Hospital October 17, 2009. HSCT patients. Highly susceptible to infections primary diagnosis chemotherapy and anti-GVHD medicines pancytopenia indwelling catheters mucosal and skin breakdown
E N D
Infections in HSCT Meng Yao Lu Department of Pediatrics National Taiwan University Hospital October 17, 2009
HSCT patients . . . • Highly susceptible to infections • primary diagnosis • chemotherapy and anti-GVHD medicines • pancytopenia • indwelling catheters • mucosal and skin breakdown • parenteral nutrition • broad spectrum antibiotics
Infections in transplant . . . • prolonged fever in >90% • 50% have documented infections • bacterial >> fungal > viral • infectious mortality of 4%-33% • bacterial and fungal infections predominate in the first post-transplant month • after 100 days, viral and encapsulatedbacterial infections predominate • risk depends on type of transplant • allogeneic unrelated >> allogeneic related > autologous
Three Periods of susceptibility . . . • early recovery or “pre-engraftment” • first several weeks after transplant • related to neutropenia, chemotherapy induced mucositis and CVL placement • mid-recovery or “early post-engraftment” • second and third months after transplant • related to acute GVHD, decreased cellular immunity secondary to GVHD, immunosuppressive therapy and viral infections (e.g. CMV) and indwelling CVLs • late recovery • interval beyond three months after transplant • related to decreased cellular immunity secondary to chronic GVHD, nonspecific suppressor cells due to chronic GVHD, reduced opsonization, decreased reticuloendothelial function, immunoglobulin G subclass deficiencies
Prevention • Conscientious hand washing • meticulous oral hygiene • low bacterial diet • fruits & fresh salads --> aerobic GN rods • pepper --> Aspergillus • HEPA filtration • decontamination • not universally practiced • Laminar Air Flow (LAF) rooms • Surveillance cultures
Common sites of infection . . . • blood (40.1%) • GI tract (12.7%) • skin (12.7%) • upper respiratory tract (11.7%) • lung (10.7%) • urinary tract (6.8%) • hepatobiliary system (1.6%) • central nervous system (1.6%) • eye (0.7%) • Blood. November 1995, Ochs et al.
Gram positives GP bacteremia rates now exceed GN rates enter via central lines, skin and occasionally via GI tract Staph epidermidis Staph aureus enterococcus α hemolytic strep Corynebacterium spp. Gram negatives the most virulent and a frequent cause of morbidity & mortality enter via mucosa/GI tract, damaged skin, or central lines Eschericia coli Klebsiella spp. P. aeruginosa Pseudomonas Enterobacter Acinetobacter Proteus Serratia The common bacteria . . .
Antibacterial Therapy . . . • Pre-Transplant Prophylaxis • no longer routinely implemented at all transplant centers • included oral nonabsorbable agents (e.g. Vancomycin, Gentamicin, neomycin, colistin and polymyxin B) • use of anti-PCP therapy is universal for all centers • Empiric Treatment • prompt administration of broad spectrum coverage • begin usually with third-generation cephalosporin or broad-spectrum penicillin, add aminoglycoside with septic picture • reevaluate if fever persists (> 3 days) and no + cultures • Specific Therapy • tailor to identification and sensitivity panels • may await confirmation of S. epidermidis infection with repeat cultures
Candida sp. granulocytopenia cell-mediated immunity reactivation or colonization TPN with high CHO broad spectrum antibiotics resistance to prophylaxis Aspergillus sp. granulocytopenia hi-grade GVHD broad spectrum antibiotics dusty building renovation hospital environment reactivation or colonization life style corticosteroids The common fungi . . .
Aspergillus . . . • inhalation of spores • colonization of the Sino-pulmonary tree • invasion and dissemination • lack of specific diagnostic test • mortality approaches 90% with invasion
Epidemiology of Aspergillosis in HSCT Recipients • Bimodal Distribution • Neutropenic phase • Depth • Duration • Post engraftment phase • GvHD • Steroid use • CSA/Tacrolimus • Mucosal disruption • CMV disease
Aspergillosis : Clinical Manifestations • Pneumonia • Pleuritic pain • Cough • Hemoptysis • Sinusitis • Nasal congestion • Eschars • Epistaxis • Palatal hemierythema • Disseminated infection (CNS)
Prophylaxis Polyenes (nystatin) Amphotericin B broad spectrum extensive potential toxicities Azoles intravenous versus oral Echinocandins Caspofungin Micafungin Treatment Amphotericin B 0.5-1.5 mg/kg/day IV systemic greatly increased toxicities, especially with concurrent CYA Azoles Voriconazole Echinocandins Caspofungin Micafungin Antifungal Therapy . . .
The common viruses . . . • Herpesviruses • CMV- associated with high rates of mortality • EBV - PTLD • HSV- 70-80% of transplant pts. are seropositive • VZV- 20-50% of transplant pts. develop zoster • Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) • 0.5% of allogeneic BMT recipients develop EBV-LPS • HHV6 • Respiratory Viruses • RSV, parainfluenza viruses, rhinovirus and influenza A & B • Enteroviruses • adenovirus, coxsackie virus and rotavirus
Prophylaxis CMV CMV-neg. blood pdts ganciclovir HSV Acyclovir VZV usually unnecessary Treatment CMV Ganciclovir Foscarnet Cidofovir immunoglobulin HSV hi-dose acyclovir foscarnet VZV hi-dose acyclovir EBV donor lymphocytes Antiviral Therapy . . .
HSV 1 & 2 infection • Predominantly during neutropenia and within day 30 of HSCT • Mucocutaneous (oral/genital), esophageal, disseminated • Routine prophylaxis use of acyclovir • Resistance is uncommon
CMV infection • CMV infection remains as an important cause of morbidity and mortality in children undergoing HSCT. • Treatment Strategies • Prophylactic therapy • Pre-emptive therapy after periodic surveillance
Suppression of CMV reduces disease probability 1.0 0.8 0.6 Probability of disease 0.4 0.2 0.0 3 4 5 6 7 Log viral load (genomes/ml) Cope et al (1997) J Infect Dis 176: 1484-90
Risk factor Transplant type and conditioning • Peak incidence Day+ 45-60 days • MUD > MRD > autograft • BMT > PBSCT ? • Conditioning • Myeloablative> non-myeloablative < 100 days • Myeloablative=non-myeloablative at 1 year • T cell depletion • In vivo (ATG, Campath) • Ex vivo (CD34 selection)
Interventions to control CMV CMV Naive Prevent infection CMV Neg Donor, Leokodepletion Primary infection Latency Prophylaxis Reactivation ( +ve pp65 or PCR) Pre-emptive therapy Disease
Prophylaxis Universal or targeted Eliminates direct and indirect effects of CMV Subset of patients remain at risk of late CMV infection/disease after cessation of prophylaxis Pre-emptive therapy Targets individuals based on their virologic markers Minimises drug exposure Patients may require more than one treatment May not eliminate the indirect effects of CMV Therapeutic approaches to control CMV replication Forum debate (2001) Rev Med Virol 11:73-86
CMV viral load and pre-emptive antiviral therapy • Preemptive treatment : highly effective • Detection = pp65 antigenemia assay = pp67 mRNA assay :sensitive but seldom use = DNA detection methods = Quantitative real-time PCR assays
Therapy for EBV PTLD • Decrease immunosuppression • Rituximab • Antiviral agent • Donor-derived EBV-specific CTLs • Chemotherapy
Herpes Zooster/Varicella • Primary vs reactivated • High mortality rate in disseminated infection • High dose acyclovir • Prevention • Acyclovir prophylaxis • VZIG within 96h of exposure • Immunization of seronegative household membersw • Contact and respiratory precautions
Immunoglobulins • No role in Autologous transplant recipients • Allogeneic recipients: • 400-500 mg/kg weekly from day 7 to day 100+ • Reported effects: • decrease bacterial sepsis • decrease CMV disease • decrease interstitial pneumonitis • decrease acute GVHD • decrease bacterial infections • decreased mortality