390 likes | 406 Views
Explore the systematic study of 3D magnetoconvection and magnetic flux separation in photospheric convection, showcasing interactions and dynamics. Detailed simulations and findings provide insights into convective behavior with varying magnetic fields.
E N D
Magnetoconvection 磯部洋明 2003/11/10 太陽雑誌会
Today I introduce: • “On the interaction between convetcion and magnetic field” Cattaneo, Emone, & Weiss 2003, ApJ, 588, 1183 - Systematic study of 3D Boussinesq convection • “Magnetic flux sepation in photospheric convection” Weiss, Proctor, & Brownjohn 2002, MNRAS, 337, 293 - Systematic study of 3D compressible convection
On the interaction between convetcion and magnetic field (Cattaneo et al. 2003) • Large scale 3D numerical experiment of non-linear Bossinesq magnetoconvection • Systematic survey of interaction of convection with imposed vertical magnetic field • As the field strength decrease, the solution falls in different regime: convection inhibited, oscillatory convection, vigorous magnetoconvection, and dynamo.
Boussinesq approximation • Density variation is considered only in the buoyancy term. • Up-down symmetry
Model • Cartesian box 10x10x1, no rotation • Initial condition: polytropic static solution • Boundary conditions • Periodic in horizontal direction • Rayleigh # R = 5x105 (Rc〜657.51 when B=0) • Kinetic Prandtl # σ=ν/κ = 1 • Magnetic Prandl # σm =ν/η = 5 => ζ= σ/ σm = 0.2 (magnetic Schmidt #) • Chandrasekhar # Q = Bσm /σ2
Linear analysis • Case of B=0 • convection sets in as a direct instability at R=Rc • Case of B≠0 and ζ≥1 • convection sets in as a direct instability for all value of B • Case of B≠0 and ζ<1 (as is the case here) • direct instability if B(or Q) is below critical value, and oscillatory instability if it is above it.
Oscillatory and stationary bifurcations No unstable mode Instability extends to a broad band of horizontal wave number => little indication of preffered horiozontal scale Oscillation Stationary convection * Rayleight # is fixed horizonta k
Critial wave number for the onset of convection Smaller horizontal scale in larger B case Large B
From dynamo action to magnetoconvection seed field = weak and small scale magnetic field with no net flux
Surface features: dynamo solution • meso-scale celler pattern • magnetic field (both positive and negative) concentrates on the corners of meso-scale pattern.
Typical horizontal scales at the top boundary Temperature Diamonds: mesocale cells Squares: smaller cells Line: linear theory B
Probability Distibution Functions velocity B solid: dynamo dashed: case 4 (intermidiate), dotted: case6 (oscillatory)
Up-down symmetry Light; |B| at the top Dark: |B| at the bottom
Magnetic flux separation in photospheric convectionWeiss, Proctor, & Bronwjohn 2002, MNRAS, 337, 293 • systematic study of compressible magnetoconvection • Wide aspect ratio (8x8x1), strongly stratified (density ratio = 11) • A regime that does not apper in Boussinesq convection: flux separation
Flux separation B • First recognized by Tao et al (1998) • Magnetic field is expelled from broad and vigorous convecting plume. • Strong fields are associated with small-scale weak convection T
Model • Almost same as that of Cattaneo et al 2002 except for compressibility (density ratio = 11) • Slightly different top boundary (dT/dz=(θT)4: radiative boundary) • Magnetic field strengty is changed in the range of Q=200-3000. No dynamo regime. • Plasma beta > 50 for all cases. Magnetic pressure can be only locally important
Q=3000 (aspect ratio=4): small scale convection ←B at the top ←T flucturation at the side ←B at the bottom ←dT/dz at the top ←T flucturation at the side ←dT/dz at the bottom dT/dz∝T4 is a proxy for the intensity of surface radiation
Q=2000: 2 solutions begin with small large perturbation begin with small scale perturbation
Q=1600: again, 2 solutions Flux separation is a kind of hysteresis.
Q=200 • Magnetic field concentrate at the cell boundaries. • No isolated flux tube is found • Run with smaller Q difficult because of numerical problem.
Discussion • Flux separation is a robust feature seen in broad range of parameters • Flux separation is hardly seen in Boussinesq calculations. Up-down asymmetry in compressible convection causes the higher velocity at the top, so the field can be swept into the upper network
Application to solar photosphere • Umbral dots • Light bridges
Magnetic sheet (no shear) in vigorously conevecting velosity field • 計算領域: 0<x<40, 0<y<40, -6<z<3.5 (unit: scale height at z=0) • 鉛直方向の境界条件: T=一定, Vz=0, stress free, perfect conducting • 水平方向は周期境界 • 光球付近(-0.5<z<0.5)に(放射)冷却 • 初期のRayleigh数 = 10000, Prandl数 = 0.1, 磁気Prandl数 =0.1 • 準定常状態に発達した対流中に磁気シートを挿入
(B ≈ 5×Beq) t=20 t=50 t=80 t=100 Isovolume of |B|, Vz at z=0 (gray), Temperature (side)
Vz(gray )and |B| (contour) at the phorosphere t=0 t=50 t=100 t=150 • Interchange mode is dominant. Convective plume is modified along the magneti field • No signature of undular mode in the nonlinear phase • Corresponding to the dark lane in the ephemeral regions?
B ≈ 0.2Beq • Magnetic field cannot change the structure of convection. • Strong B field (B>Beq) at the corner of the cell boundaries. • No mesoscale is seen, probably because of small aspect ratio