1 / 28

Expanding and Financing Supportive Housing In Los Angeles

Expanding and Financing Supportive Housing In Los Angeles. Joshua Bamberger, MD, MPH San Francisco Dept. of Public Health josh.bamberger@sfdph.org. Overview. Financing supportive housing Comparing buildings and services Model of providing healthcare for housed people

moanna
Download Presentation

Expanding and Financing Supportive Housing In Los Angeles

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Expanding and Financing Supportive Housing In Los Angeles Joshua Bamberger, MD, MPH San Francisco Dept. of Public Health josh.bamberger@sfdph.org

  2. Overview • Financing supportive housing • Comparing buildings and services • Model of providing healthcare for housed people • Integration of mental health and medical services • Mainstream revenue to pay for services

  3. Financing Supportive Housing

  4. Tale of 3 Buildings • Plaza • Folsom-Dore • Empress

  5. $30 million construction Private investors receiving tax credits from Feds Business model includes resident rent, rent subsidies Plaza Apartments

  6. Costs • $448,636/yr in rent subsidies • Sliding scale rent- 50% income @$350/month • $459,830/year in support services contract • $150,000/yr in on-site medical staff • $1,058,000 annual public expenditure • $445,000 in rent • $1,417/client/month • $1.5 million annual budget

  7. Is Homelessness Cheaper than Housing? Total Public Health Costs to be Homeless $1.9 million Total Public Health Costs to be Housed $1.2 million

  8. Health cost reduction first year • Plaza • $ 1,709,000 total; $20,105 per resident • Folsom Dore • $521,000 total; $20,864 per resident • Empress (not including SNF) • $ 943,500 total; $11,100 per resident

  9. Conclusions • Increase housing stability/decrease costs when • Mixed population buildings • High concentration of seniors • High quality architecture and apartments • Neighborhood with less drug use/sales • Case managers can achieve tasks • Why? Trauma

  10. Financing Healthcare Services

  11. Mainstream Healthcare Funding Sources • Medi-Cal billing- FQHC • Historic ties to OEO/War on Poverty • HRSA Community Health Centers • Other • Opportunity to end homelessness

  12. FQHC • Must apply to both Feds for health center status and State for encounter rate • Rate determined by total cost/total patients

  13. FQHC- billing (cont’d) • Patient must have Medi-Cal • Rate for point of service by licensed providers • No limit on length of time per visit • No more than one visit/day for Primary Care • No more than 2 visits/month for other care

  14. MD, DO NP/PA Psychiatrists Psychologists LCSW (2/month) Acupuncture (for SA) Podiatry Dentists RN MFT Case managers Med Assistance MSW (not licensed) Types of providersAllowed Not Allowed

  15. Satellites • Can open pretty much anywhere • Must not be open more than 20hrs/week • Must treat pts enrolled in home clinic as PC • Need Fire Marshall and state approval • Include in scope of work

  16. Components of High Productivity Clinical Functions • Low support staff to provider ratio • High Medi-Cal Penetration • Mix of drop in and appointment • Variety of staff skill set and specialties • Adherence assistance • One stop shopping

  17. Housing and Urban Health Clinic

  18. HUH Clinic Funding • FQHC granted as part of Federal Grant • Functioned as satellite as HCH site • Used year of satellite function to come up with cost report • Made estimates of staff time doing PC • Received 80% of requested rate • $202.40 per visit

  19. HUH Clinic Staffing • 10 mid-levels (2 psych NP) • 1 FT MD • 1 Part-time Med Director • Clinic Director is NP • 5 Full or part time psychiatrists (3 FTE) • 1 RN, 1 Americorp, 1 EW, 1 Clerk • Adherence program: 1 SW, 1 RN, 1 NP

  20. Components of Model • First door is right door- crossover of med and psych • Build on relationship • Reduce patient waiting time • Give staff the opportunity to do what they are trained to do • Staff set length of visit/mix of drop-in, appointment • Embrace vicarious trauma

  21. Cost • Annual Budget: $2.1 million • Annual Revenue: $2.3 million • Need grant money for innovation

  22. LA HCH Medi-Cal uptake: 10% FQHC rate: $120 High support staff to clinician ratio Huge homeless health demand Silo’d mental health and medical care HUH Medi-Cal update: 80% FQHC rate: $202 Low support staff to clinician ratio Large pop in supportive housing Integrated mental health and medical Comparison of HUH and LA HCH

  23. Recommendations • Invest in SSI/MediCal eligibility resources • Use FQHC to hire Behavioral Health staff • Increase Medi-Cal FQHC rate • Set up clinic centrally to serve all people in supportive housing

  24. Conclusions • Mainstream funding can support clinic services • Local funds to support rent subsidies and on-site services • Decrease in downstream $ is greater than public expenditures- argument for day rate

  25. josh.bamberger@sfdph.org

More Related