E N D
1. Leo Burnett & TRW Systems Elizabeth Chung
Guus Goorts
Merete Aarhaug
Stephanie Coyiuto
Jaime Zhong
2. Agenda Overview - The Link
Leo Burnett
TRW Systems
Conclusion
3. The Link
4. Leo Burnett - History 1997
Advertising agency
Started in 1935 and located in Chicago
CEO and Chairman – Richard Fizdale
World’s 8-th largest ad agency
Clients: Kellogg’s, Marlboro Man, Coke
1916 full time and 218 part time employees
5. Leo Burnett - Mission
Current Philosophy – Brand Belief System (BBS)
“The Leo BBS is driven by the concept of creating belief…”
6. Functional vs. Divisional Structure
7. Leo Burnett – StructureComparison of new vs. old structure Old – Functional
Slow response time to environmental changes
Clients do not get one on one attention
Coordination, communication slowed among departments
Less innovation and creativeness
Economies of scale
In-depth knowledge and skill development New – Divisional
Faster and better response to clients’ demands
Full attention from agency
Decentralized decision making
Quality of communication improved
No more economies of scale
Poor coordination across the mini-agencies
8. Leo Burnett - Reasons For Change External environment:
Several major setbacks
Loss of high-profile accounts - United Airlines
Regulatory scrutiny of Marlboro Man ads for Philip Morris
Internal environment
Loss of morale among employees (74 employees laid off)
Power struggle among top executives
9. Leo Burnett – EvaluationDoes it make sense? Will it work? Yes:
Necessary shake up
Client dissatisfaction
Improved internal /external communication
Customization for clients
Stimulate creativity
Increased responsiveness to environment No:
Big organization
Power of brand name
Draw on Burnett’s global resources
Acceptance by:
Employees
Clients
Loss of specialization
Need more coordination among divisions
10. TRW Systems - History
11. TRW Systems - Strategy No clearly articulated strategy
Fortune: Professional personnel is competitive advantage
Large competitors (Boeing, Lockheed, Northrop Grumman, BAE)
Growth
12. The Matrix Structure Question
What are the characteristics of a matrix structure?
13. The Matrix Structure Dual authority lines
Any combination of function, product and geographic
Shifting of project teams
What are TRW’s focus dimensions (function, product, geographic)?
14. Conditions for Matrix Structure Economies of scale in the use of internal resources
Outside pressure for dual focus (function-product)
State of the art technological know-how
Responsive in the change in product line
Environment is both complex and uncertain
15. 1. Economies of Scale Project divided into sub-projects
Sequential demand: Several stages in the project’s life cycle: different people are needed ? no waste of creative people
16. 2. Outside Pressure for Dual Focus (Function-Product) Functional relationship: need of state-of- the-art technological know-how
Product lines:
Transitory
Changes in customer requirements
Possibility of cancellation of large projects
17. 3. Environment is Complex/Uncertain From single customer ? competitive organization
Creation of Aerospace Corporation (Air Force)
Before: cost-plus-fixed-fee, now: incentive contracts rewarding performance
Aerospace industry:
Large job shop subject to frequent changes
Rapid change in technology
18. Information Processing at TRW Systems Purpose:
Right balance between vertical & horizontal information flow
Tension between mechanisms:
Horizontal linkage: coordination/collaboration ? reduce control
Vertical linkage: increase control
19. Mechanisms to achieve vertical linkage
20. Mechanisms to achieve vertical linkage
21. TRW Systems: vertical linkage? No strict lines of authority
Can’t rely on bureaucracy/power to solve problems
Few formal rules/procedures
Atmosphere of looseness/freedom
Ambiguous/flexible
22. Mechanisms to achieve horizontal linkage
23. Mechanisms to achieve horizontal linkage
24. TRW Systems:Full Time Integrators Temporary project/program offices
Project manager:
responsible for coordinating people from different functional departments
No formal authority over project members
26. Sources of Power Bottom-line responsibility
Leadership at all levels of the organization
Decentralized and unstable power structure
Sources of Power/Means to maintain balance
Pay Levels
Job Titles
Access to General Manager
Situation of Offices
Reporting Level
27. Matrix Diamond Diagram Top Leadership
28. Roles and Responsibilities Functional manager/Division manager
Authority over promotion decisions and performance reviews
Program/Project Manager
Focuses on bringing project to a successful conclusion
Subproject Manager (SPM)
“prime mover in the organization”
Represents both program office and his functional area
30. Relationship between Managers Large gap between authority and responsibility
Man in the middle is working for two bosses
Multiple managers may result in confusion and ambiguity as to manager evaluation and accountability
31. Relationship among Team Members Very democratic = anarchy?
No clear leader
Role ambiguity, conflicting obligations
Potential duplication of work
Less development of long-term relationships
Career Development Program
High interaction
Good collaboration
32. Career Development - Motivation Shared responsibility = Shared measurements and rewards (e.g. team rewards)
Shift towards intrinsic over extrinsic motivation
Focus on:
personal contribution & self-learning; personal & professional growth
High caliber individuals; Highly committed and motivated individuals
Enhanced opportunities for visibility & career opportunities
Low turnover
TRW: ranked 1st in desirability as an employer; 2nd in salary
33. Career Development(2 techniques: team development and t–groups) Pros
More organic organization
Team Development
Efforts to get a new team started faster
Ongoing group
Critiquing of the meetings in the organization
Provides employees with good interpersonal skills and training
Helps deal with conflicts
Creates openness
Possibly greater employee satisfaction
Cons
Only a good thing idealistically
Lack of well-trained people to handle employees
Participation is involuntary
Increased stress and pressure on employees
34. Further Challenges with Growth Current problems amplified
Increased conflicts and confusion
More time consuming
Possible loss of focus on strategy
Human resources issues
Loss of control
35. Conclusion(Norhia et.al HBR 2003)
36. Leo Burnett Looking at Nohria et. al.’s 2003 HBR work, there is an emphasis on Structure a primary mgt practiceLooking at Nohria et. al.’s 2003 HBR work, there is an emphasis on Structure a primary mgt practice
37. Leo Burnett in 2004 End of the divisional structure in 1999
“… previous mini-agency arrangement worked well in that it brought together brand teams, but it was less effective as a business structure.” –Linda Wolf, CEO
Unified Structure
Brand Teams intact but agency acts as one business unit
38. TRW Systems Looking at Nohria et. al.’s 2003 HBR work, there is an emphasis on Structure a primary mgt practiceLooking at Nohria et. al.’s 2003 HBR work, there is an emphasis on Structure a primary mgt practice
39. Sales performance at TRW Systems
40. Number of employees at TRW Systems
41. TRW Systems in 2004
42. Q & A