1 / 21

Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Program

Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Program. The R21 Mechanism. Your guide through the R21 jungle*. Patricia Parmelee, PhD (Pat to you) .

monisha
Download Presentation

Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Program

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Exploratory/Developmental Research Grant Program The R21 Mechanism

  2. Your guide through the R21 jungle* Patricia Parmelee, PhD (Pat to you) * jun’ gle, n.: a confused or disordered mass of objects; something that baffles or frustrates by its tangled or complex character; a place of ruthless struggle for survival Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary http://merriam-webster.com/dictionary/jungle

  3. Your guide through the R21 jungle* Patricia Parmelee, PhD (Pat to you) Qualifications: • Years & years & years reviewing R21s on various NIH study sections • Previously PI on an R21 (AG026121) • Several R21 applications in various stages of development/revision

  4. What’s an R21? According to US DHHS PA-06-181, A grant mechanism that is “…intended to encourageexploratory and developmentalresearch projects by providing support for the early and conceptualstages of these projects.”

  5. What’s an R21? Explores • Novel concepts or methods • Previously un- or understudied issues • Feasibility/applicability of a research idea Develops • New techniques and approaches • New models, methods or applications

  6. R21 applications : the basics • Two years’ funding • Up to $275,000 TDC Maximum $200,000 in a given year • Modular budget • 7-page limit for research plan • Adobe e-submission • One revision permitted • Due Feb. 16 - June 16 - Oct. 16

  7. Who supports R21s? Just about all NIH branches… • NCCAM • NEI • NHLBI • NHGRI • NLM • NIA • NIAAA • But not FIC, NCI, NCMHD, NCRR NIGMS • NIAID • NIAMS • NIBIB • NICHD • NIDCD • NIDA • NIDCR • NIDDK • NIEHS • NIMH • NINDS • NINR

  8. Characteristics of a successfulR21 “By using the R21 mechanism, the NIH seeks to foster the introduction of novel scientific ideas, model systems, tools, agents, targets and technologies that have the potential to substantially advance biomedical science.” US DHHS PA-06-181

  9. Characteristics of a successfulR21 • Innovative • High risk • Innovative • Potentially big pay-off • Innovative • Rigorous • Did I mention “innovative”?

  10. Some examples of successfulR21s • Developing materials and methods for a translational intervention • Using existing large data sets to develop statistical techniques for modeling change in health status • Finding genes for alcohol-related behaviors & risk for alcoholism • Improving the trauma system response to disaster

  11. What isn’t an R21? • A “mini R01” • A “maxi R03” • A training grant

  12. Preparing an R21 Some frequently asked questions about R21s • Does the research plan follow the same format as an R01? • Do I need pilot data? • Do I need to have clear, testable hypotheses? The answer? It depends!

  13. Preparing an R21 Some frequently asked questions about R21s • Does the research plan follow the same format as an R01?

  14. Preparing an R21 Some frequently asked questions about R21s • Does the research plan follow the same format as an R01? • Do I need pilot data?

  15. Preparing an R21 Some frequently asked questions about R21s • Does the research plan follow the same format as an R01? • Do I need pilot data? • Do I need to have clear, testable hypotheses?

  16. Preparing an R21 Points to ponder as you write • What truly newknowledge might this yield? • What’s unique about how I’m going about generating that knowledge? • How will this work prepare me to conduct similar, larger-scale research? • Do I have a clear game plan for next steps once the R21 is completed?

  17. Preparing an R21 Some common “errors” in writing R21 applications • Not conveying how the work is exploratory/developmental • Trying to do too much • Too much structure (the “mini R01”) • Too little structure (“trust me”)

  18. How do reviewers ideally view R21s? “reviewers will focus their evaluation on • the conceptual framework • the level of innovation, and • the potential to significantly advance our knowledge or understanding.” Reviewers will place less emphasis on methodological details and certain indicators traditionally used in evaluation the scientific merit of R01 applications, including supportive preliminary data.” US DHHS PA-06-181

  19. How do reviewers actually view R21s? Sometimes appropriately… • Excellent “first step” for new investigators with a clear long-range research plan • Good for forays into less well-studied areas Sometimes not… • Not accepting “exploratory” nature • Holding to R01-level methodological standard • Unfamiliar with the research area

  20. Dealing with an overly zealous reviewer Be respectful… • “We appreciate your thorough critique…” • “The reviewers correctly pointed out…” but stand your ground • “… is not feasible at this first, exploratory stage” • “Inherent limitations of the R21 mechanism preclude…” • “This study addresses feasibility, not hypothesis-testing.” • “… but will certainly be included in our future, full-scale intervention efforts.”

  21. In summary…. • R21 is a great “foot in the door” • Not always well understood by investigators… OR study section! • Work closely w’ program officer to determine if it’s appropriate for your research

More Related