140 likes | 269 Views
THE MENTAL HEALTH IMPLICATIONS OF WORKING IN A LUNAR SETTLEMENT. CHESTER S. SPELL School of Business-Camden Rutgers University cspell@camden.rutgers.edu. Technology makes it possible for human beings to live and work in places that in the past we could neither reach nor have survived in.
E N D
THE MENTAL HEALTHIMPLICATIONS OF WORKING IN A LUNAR SETTLEMENT CHESTER S. SPELLSchool of Business-CamdenRutgers Universitycspell@camden.rutgers.edu
Technology makes it possible for human beings to live and work in places that in the past we could neither reach nor have survived in. • Extreme environments (e.g. Lunar base) present unique opportunities for psychological research and applications.
Prior Research Psychological research of EUEs: • polar stations • space vehicles • undersea habitats Methods : psychometric and projective tests, interviews, participant observations, field studies, simulations
The Good News • Autobiographical accounts of astronauts(Collins 1974). • Polar crews report many more positive than negative experiences • Twenty-six of 28 participants in a undersea habitat study were willing to do it again
Perception and reality • How people experience an environment is more important than the objective characteristics of the environment (Suedfeld 1991).
Potential negative impact on psychological well-being Social isolation Confinement Sensory restriction Circadian Rhythms
Confinement & Monotony • After 2 weeks the foremost psychological irritants were inadequate leadership and the behavior of others (Smith,1969) . • Members with low social coherence report significantly more depression, anxiety, and anger (Palinkas,2003)
Conflict • Murderous attack over a chess game (Palinkas 1990) • Assault with a hammer (New Zealand Herald 1996). • Foreign visitors in Russian and American space flights felt marginalized.
Are prior results relevant for a lunar base? • Unlikely that we can generalize data from Mercury missions, Shuttle missions of a week or two, Mir space station missions of 6–12 months.
Our research:Study 1 • People working in groups share perceptions of fairness of work assignments, responsibility, etc. • The work group’s “fairness climate” can affect individual levels of anxiety and depression (Spell & Arnold, in press) • Social contagion-feelings of fairness (or unfairness)
Implication: in cohesive groups (limited interaction outside of group) establishing and maintaining fair procedures especially significant
Our research:Study 2 • Faultlines: subgroups or divisions • Gender • Age • Experience level • Ethnic group • groups with strong faultlines and unsupportive supervisors were less anxious and depressed than groups with weak faultlines • groups with strong faultlines and perceived unfairness were less anxious and depressed than groups with weak faultlines
Implications • Group composition affects individual mental health • In diverse work groups, importance of supportive supervisor trained in leadership • Speculation: effects exacerbated in extreme and isolated work environment of a lunar base
Recommendations • Radloff & Helmreich: those who were considered best suited to working under water could also walk on it(!) • (Russian) space program:stress test requiring a group of candidates to drive a small car cross-country • Select crews, not just individuals