1 / 14

Group π Michelle Kraft, Jonas Acres, Ying Chiat Ho, Terry Smith

Group π Michelle Kraft, Jonas Acres, Ying Chiat Ho, Terry Smith. Analysis of the Spring Model for Vibrating Beam. Table of C and K values for all data sets. Bar Graph of C’s to look for outliers. Bar Chart of K’s to look for outliers. Data A vs. Average Model. Data A Checking Assumptions.

montana-mcknight
Download Presentation

Group π Michelle Kraft, Jonas Acres, Ying Chiat Ho, Terry Smith

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group πMichelle Kraft, Jonas Acres, Ying Chiat Ho, Terry Smith Analysis of the Spring Model for Vibrating Beam

  2. Table of C and K values for all data sets

  3. Bar Graph of C’s to look for outliers

  4. Bar Chart of K’s to look for outliers

  5. Data A vs. Average Model

  6. Data A Checking Assumptions

  7. Data A Checking Assumptions con’t

  8. Data A Checking Assumptions con’t

  9. Smoothing Spline Test for Data A F* = 1.5774 p-val = 0

  10. Data B vs. Average Model

  11. Data B Checking Assumptions

  12. Data B Checking Assumptions con’t

  13. Data B Checking Assumptions

  14. Moral of the story • Spring model good as a very very very very VERY vague approximation • Actually not too bad in some cases! • Not good for accurate measurement • Matlab produces pretty graphs • Seriously, those QQs are pretty neat • Conclusion: A different model is needed.

More Related