230 likes | 426 Views
Background. WHO ProTEST initiative started in 1998 in 6 districts in 3 countriesMalawi: Lilongwe districtSouth-Africa: Bohlabela (Limpopo), East-London (Eastern Cape), Cape Town Central District (Western Cape), Ugu-South (KwazuluNatal)Zambia: Lusaka district. Specific Objectives. Present quantitative and qualitative data on the outcomes of the various interventions including cost-effectiveness and behaviour studiesProvide policy recommendations for collaborative TB and HIV programme activit30087
E N D
1. TB/HIV Lessons Learned: ProTEST meeting DurbanFebruary 2003 Jeroen van Gorkom
KNCV Tuberculosis Foundation
2. Background WHO ProTEST initiative started in 1998 in 6 districts in 3 countries
Malawi: Lilongwe district
South-Africa: Bohlabela (Limpopo), East-London (Eastern Cape), Cape Town Central District (Western Cape), Ugu-South (KwazuluNatal)
Zambia: Lusaka district
3. Specific Objectives Present quantitative and qualitative data on the outcomes of the various interventions including cost-effectiveness and behaviour studies
Provide policy recommendations for collaborative TB and HIV programme activities
Develop indicators and targets for monitoring and evaluation
Develop policy recommendations for expansion of district pilot projects to national programmes
Indicate areas for operational research
4. Participants Country teams from the 3 ProTEST project countries
Country teams from Mozambique, Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda, Ethiopia.
Mentors and partners (CDC, FHI, KNCV, LSHTM, etc.)
UNAIDS inter country teams
Representatives of development agencies
5. Main Conclusions and Recommendations
6. Interventions Coordination and Collaboration
VCT expansion
HIV prevention (STI management, condom distribution)
Intensifed case-finding TB in VCT centres CPT
IPT
CPT
7. 1. Improving Collaboration ProTEST projects were successfull in creating collaborative health networks in TB and HIV/AIDS, where none if little existed before, creating collaboration between:
Government ? NGOs ? Community Org.
Hospitals ? clinics ? home based care
TB ? HIV/AIDS programs
Researchers ? Implementors
8. 1. Improving Collaboration (cont.) Joint situational analysis critical as starting point
Most projects hired additional staff
Collaboration at District Level “natural”
Collaboration between mid-level and national level TB and HIV/AIDS programs was more difficult to realize
9. Recommendations Collaboration Address problem of insufficient human resources in the implementation of TB and HIV/AIDS care (e.g. lay counsellors)
Project approach initially useful
After that mainstream TB in HIV/AIDS plan, and HIV in TB plan, ensuring coordination, clear roles and responsibilities
Harmonization
10. 2. VCT Expansion All projects
Rapid tests and same day result most efficient
Lay counsellors doing rapid tests: feasible and efficient
Lay counsellors critical for increasing counselling capacity
General nurses ready and keen to do counselling when trained and after HIV/AIDS is “normalized”.
VCT services fulfilling unmet demand
11. 2. VCT Recommendations Provide access to VCT service for different client groups
Use on site rapid HIV testing
Promote and implement standardised National Policy
Quality Control
Establish uninterrupted HIV test supply
Accomodate lay staff as counsellors and HIV testers, in the health system and laws
12. 3. HIV Prevention 120,000 clients HIV tested ? 12,000 HIV infections prevented
Promotion and implementation of STI screening and treatment as good clinical practice
PMTCT included in ProTEST services network
Condom distribution
Peer support groups; Post-Test Clubs
IEC to TB patients and VCT clients
Impact measurement difficult
13. RecommendationsHIV prevention
Mainstream HIV prevention where and when possible in TB/HIV care network
Use M&E indicators of HIV/AIDS program
14. 4. Intensified case-finding tuberculosis Symptomatic screening VCT clients using questionnaire
Tuberculosis symptoms in HIV+ clients 2-57%
Diagnosis of Tuberculosis in symptomatic HIV+ patients < 1% - 10%
Easy, low incremental cost, variable effectiveness
15. RecommendationsICF Promote and implement ICF in all settings where TB/HIV dual infection or disease is bound to be high
Monitor outcome of ICF in various settings
Collect best practice in use of IEC for ICF in communities and health care settings
16. 5. CPT Implemented in all projects, except Zambia (RCT)
“Easy”to implement with low incremental costs
Uptake by TB patients variable (12%-61%)
Patients taking CPT keen to do so and continue after TB treatment
Health workers like to provide it: “We can offer something”
BUT
Efficacy questioned
Eligibility criteria variable depending on presence or absence of Nat. HIV/AIDS Program policy
By end of TB treatment 40-82% still using CPT
Adherence criteria not standardised
17. 5. CPTRecommendations Standardize monitoring tools
WHO and UNAIDS to update the recommendations of the Harare workshop (2001) on the basis of:
The evidence base in countries with variable background CTM resistance
CPT in the presence of ART/HAART
18. 6. IPT In all ProTEST sites
Only asymptomatic “fit” clients eligible
“Easy” to add-on, low incremental costs
Uptake 23-77% of eligible HIV+ clients
Adherence 24-58%
Cost-effective
Health workers like it: “We offer something”
Adherence criteria not standardized
Epidemiological impact on TB transmission limited due to low uptake
19. 6. IPT Evidence needed:
Cost and C/E of IPT in routine services, comparing different delivery models
Feasibility and C/E of lifelong IPT in preventing the first episode of TB
Efficacy, feasibility and C/E of lifelong IPT in preventing a recurrent episode of TB
Efficacy of IPT in the presence of ART/HAART
20. 6. IPTRecommendations Reinforce the existing WHO policy of 1998. There is no need to review this policy in the light of current evidence
Support research into the utility of IPT in a context of ART, its effectiveness and efficacy, both for preventing first episodes and recurrent episodes of TB WHO recommnedations on IPT 1998:
For prevention of first ever episode
For individuals rather than as a public health benefit
As part of package of care for PLWHA
When it will not detract from TB programme resources or undermine performance in achieving DOTS. WHO recommnedations on IPT 1998:
For prevention of first ever episode
For individuals rather than as a public health benefit
As part of package of care for PLWHA
When it will not detract from TB programme resources or undermine performance in achieving DOTS.
21. Home Based Care Links created in 3/6 projects
Identify and refer suspects of TB
Support TB treatment and provide DOT
Trace treatment interruptors
Community IEC on TB ? HIV/AIDS
Community health workers keen to take on TB
Impact of HBC on TB ICF and Treatment Success not yet well documented, and small scale
Recommendation
Document impact of HBC on ICF and treatment success.
22. Context Context has changed since 1998
VCT now accepted as major component of HIV/AIDS response
HIV/AIDS Care&Support on HIV/AIDS agenda
TB in PLWHA thus much higher priority for HIV/AIDS programs
23. Summary High synergy, low incremental cost:
Collaboration, networking, referral
Intensified Case Finding in VCT and clinical setting
Home Based Care => ICF and TB case-holding
Feasibility high, low incremental cost, evidence of efficacy conflicting or absent: CPT
Feasibility fair, low incremental cost, uptake moderate, effectiveness limited: IPT
Inadequate evidence for efficacy and effectiveness in combination with ART: CPT, IPT
24. Challenges Ahead Mainstream TB prevention and care activities in the Care&Support Strategy of the HIV/AIDS programs
Mainstream HIV/AIDS prevention and care activities in DOTS programs
Human Resource Development (quantity and quality)
Monitoring and Evaluation
More evidence needed in: CPT/IPT + ART
Communicate ? Coordinate ?Collaborate ?Corroborate
Consider reading the report