840 likes | 1.99k Views
Cognitive Therapy. By Barbara LoFrisco Cognitive Behavioral Seminar University of South Florida. Cognitive Therapy – The Theory. In order to understand an emotional disturbance, one must understand the mental processes or cognitions These mental events are readily accessible
E N D
Cognitive Therapy By Barbara LoFrisco Cognitive Behavioral Seminar University of South Florida
Cognitive Therapy – The Theory • In order to understand an emotional disturbance, one must understand the mental processes or cognitions • These mental events are readily accessible • Patient’s beliefs are examined: him/herself, future and world • Any concern will be in one of these domains • This is the “cognitive triad” (Beck, Rush, Shaw & Emery, 1979) • Common themes are found with both anxious and depressed patients
Cognitive Therapy- The Process • Patient becomes aware of cognition • Patient frames cognition as a hypothesis • Patient scrutinizes belief • Patient gradually arrives at a different view • Changes in the emotional reaction should follow • Eventually, concern over recent events will diminish • Thus, negative affect is removed from ruminations about said events • Result: Less negative mood
Cognitive Therapy- The Process • Patient will start to apply these techniques to new events • Many of the skills learned in Cognitive Therapy are used by people who have never had depression • If the patient does not use these skills, the risk for relapse is high
Cognitive Therapy- Schema Work • Cognitive errors (or “automatic thoughts”) are based on schema, or “patterns of thinking” • These are the “themes” of dysfunctional thinking • All patients have them • They can be uncovered by examining cognitive errors • Can be uncovered using Downward Arrow technique • Or using “If then” logic. For example, “If I fail this exam, then I am a failure as a person”. • Old schema can be replaced with new
Cognitive Therapy- Cognitive Errors • We are all subject to cognitive errors • They occur more often in affective episodes • There is a list of common errors that patients can compare their own thoughts to: • All or nothing thinking • Over generalizing • Discounting the Positives • Jumping to conclusions
Cognitive Therapy- Cognitive Errors • Mind Reading • Fortunetelling • Magnifying/Minimizing • Emotional Reasoning • Making “should” statements • Labeling • Inappropriate Blaming
Cognitive Therapy- Cognitive Errors How many cognitive errors can you spot in this story? Mary felt isolated and alone. Mary had been married to an abusive man for 5 years and had finally decided to leave him. “I should have done it much sooner”, she reported. Mary reported that she had a history of attracting abusive men, so therefore all men must be abusive. “What is wrong with me? I’m never going to meet anyone!”
Cognitive Therapy- Cognitive Errors Mary felt isolated and alone. Mary had been married to an abusive man for 5 years and had finally decided to leave him. “I should have done it much sooner”, she reported (#7 Minimizing, #9 should statements, #11 Inappropriate Blaming). Mary reported that she had a history of attracting abusive men, so therefore all men must be abusive (#2 Overgeneralization). “What is wrong with me? I’m never going to meet anyone!” (#1 All or nothing thinking, #6 Fortune Telling).
Cognitive Therapy- Therapeutic Interaction • Relationship is one of collaboration • Patient is expert on his or her own experience, and the meaning he or she attaches to events • Therapist is expert on the model • Therapist does not make interpretations, rather solicits this information from clients • More of a state of “not knowing” • Thoughts are not replaced until patient understands the meaning of the thoughts and has decided they are not true
Cognitive Therapy- Therapeutic Interaction • Meaning system of each patient is idiosyncratic • Patients must take an active role in therapy • Differs from Michenbaum’s Cognitive Behavioral Modification: thoughts are behaviors that can simply be modified without understanding underlying meaning • Different from Michenbaum’s SIT (Self Instructional Training): client is taught to repeat specific self-coping statements rather than question their inferences • Differs from Ellis’ REBT: therapist infers clients’ thinking errors
Cognitive Therapy – Behavioral Methods • Behavioral methods sometimes used to increase behaviors or provide experiences in pleasure • Focus is always on changes in beliefs resulting from change in actions • Behavioral changes serve as “experiments” to check out a “hypothesis” that the patient and therapist have developed; or formulate a new one • But….Jacobson et al. (1996) found that 12 weeks of behavioral methods had outcomes comparable to 12 weeks of cognitive therapy.
Behavioral Methods- Applications: Self-Monitoring • Hour-by-hour record of activities and associated moods is kept • Patients record mood on a 0-100 scale, where 0 is the worst they have ever felt and 100 is the best • Beck et al. (1979) suggests the patient also record the degree of mastery or pleasure associated with the activity • Patients are sometimes surprised at how they are spending their time • Can also serve as a baseline
Behavioral Methods- Applications: Self-Monitoring • Detailed examination of this record is much better than patient’s memory for testing hypothesis • Patient’s memory is often selective • Therapist can ask patient to recall thoughts that occurred during both good and bad events • Therapist can look for consistencies in the record: which events are associated with good or bad moods, or with mastery or pleasure
Behavioral Methods: Applications: Scheduling Activities • Purpose is to get patient to engage in activities he or she is (unwisely) unwilling to do • Remove decision making as an obstacle in initiation of activity • Has decision making ever been an obstacle for you in initiating an activity? (Share with the class if you feel comfortable) • Non-adherence can be addressed therapeutically • Usually “failures” are similar to what has been troubling the patient.
Behavioral Methods: Applications: Scheduling Activities • A thorough analysis of cognitive obstacle can be performed • 3 Types of Activities to schedule: • Those associated with mastery, pleasure or good mood • Those that had been rewarding in the past but that the patient has been avoiding • New activities that might be rewarding or informative
Behavioral Methods: Applications: Scheduling Activities • Patient can use self-monitoring to monitor mood after activities • Activities can be “experiments” • Patients are more likely to do activities if they are framed as “experiments”
Behavioral Methods: Applications: Other Behavioral Activities • Breaking down larger tasks into smaller units • Makes task more concrete and less overwhelming • This is called “chunking” • Easier tasks can be accomplished first • This is called “Graded tasks” • Although simplistic, these methods can be effective because they change how patient views the (formerly) difficult task
Cognitive Methods: Daily Record of Dysfunctional Thoughts • Find DRDT in Dobson’s book. In mine it’s p. 359. • Most of the work in Cognitive Therapy centers around Daily Record of Dysfunctional Thoughts (DRDT) Beck et al. (1979) • Four most important columns correspond to the three points in the cognitive model (situation, belief, emotional consequence). • Patients first use DRDT to record unpleasant or puzzling emotions • Patient must first understand what emotions are (see handouts)
Cognitive Methods: Daily Record of Dysfunctional Thoughts • Some patients don’t know the difference between thoughts and feelings • Therapist may have to educate patient • Can give feeling chart to patients so that they can understand what different feelings are • In addition to situation and emotions, patient must also record thoughts in DRDT • This may be more difficult because patients often think situations “cause” emotions
Cognitive Methods: Daily Record of Dysfunctional Thoughts • Teach patients that it is the thoughts about the situation, not the situation that produces the emotion • Teach patient to examine his or her own inferences • It is these inferences that are the cause of distress • Automatic thoughts can be re-rated for strength of belief after alternative thought has been formulated • If ratings are similar, then the initial concern is not resolved • Affective response can also be re-rated in a similar way. • Again, lack of change means something is missing
Cognitive Methods: Three Questions • What is evidence for and against this belief? • What are the alternative interpretations? • What are the real implications, if the belief is correct?
Cognitive Methods: Downward Arrow Technique • Patient’s first thoughts are usually not therapeutically useful in that they do not describe the implications to the patient • Use Downward Arrow Technique to uncover the implications of thought • Ask “What would it mean if….?” • Or “What if it is true that….?” • Or “What about that bothers you?” • Repeat until thought is produced that will benefit from cognitive therapy
Cognitive Methods: Cognitive Errors • Teach patient to recognize when one of his or her thoughts falls into one of the categories of cognitive errors (p. 353 of Dobson, or slide #6) • Teaches patients that these are common cognitive errors: normalization
Cognitive Methods: Identifying Schemata • After a while in therapy, a certain consistency emerges in patient’s cognitive errors • These consistencies, or “themes” are the schema • They are found at the level of personal meaning • Dysfunctional Attitude Scale (DAS; Weissman & Beck, 1978) to assess schemata and track changes during treatment
Cognitive Methods: Indentifying Schemata with DAS • The DAS has 9 interpretable factors: • Vulnerability • Approval • Perfectionism • Need to please others • Imperatives • Need to impress others • Avoidance of weakness • Control over emotions • Disapproval Class give examples of 3 of them
Cognitive Methods: Socratic Questioning and Guided Discovery • Probably the most distinctive stylistic feature • Most difficult for therapists to master • Guided discovery: through use of leading questions, helping patients arrive at new perspectives • Therapists must walk a line between guiding patient and allowing patient to free-associate • Common errors of inexperienced therapists is to be in a hurry and lecture the patient or ask overly leading questions. • Even facial expression can be a factor (LoFrisco)
Cognitive Methods: Socratic Questioning and Guided Discovery • Therapist should avoid closed questions and declarative statements • This maximally engages client to think about problem and come up with solution • Helps foster independence and prevent relapse (LoFrisco) • Will have a greater chance of addressing any idiosyncratic issues; more client centered
Treatment Procedures- Beginning of Treatment • Goals: • Assessment • Beck Depression Inventory (BDI); also can be used as a session-to-session measure • Socializing patient into cognitive model • Have patient read the booklet Coping With Depression (Beck & Greenberg, 1974) • Helps to instill hope • Dealing with patient’s pessimism
Treatment Procedures- Middle Phase of Therapy • Solidify work on cognitive coping skills • Patient uses DRDT to track thoughts that produce negative affect • Therapist uses Downward Arrow Technique to help patient fine-tune their responses • Therapist reviews DRDT with patient • Patterns associated with schemata are identified • Developmental history of schemata is discussed. Why?
Treatment Procedures- Middle Phase of Therapy • Answer: to help client make sense of his or her schemata
Treatment Procedures- Final Phase • Gains are reviewed • Relapse prevention: • Anticipate situations that would tax patient and review the skills they have learned • Because…patients usually attribute their improvement to changes in their environment, not changes in themselves
Treatment Procedures- Final Phase • Patients feelings or beliefs about terminating therapy are addressed • Patient may feel like they “can’t do it on their own” • Schedule “booster” or “check-up” sessions • Jarrett et al. (1998) found that monthly check-up sessions helped to prevent relapse • Even less frequent boosters can be beneficial
Empirical Status- Depression • Rush et al. (1977) found that patients treated with cognitive therapy experienced greater symptom remission at the end of 12 weeks compared with those taking a tricyclic antidepressant (randomized trial) • Blackburn et al. (1981) and Murphy et al. (1984) did a similar study and found cognitive therapy equally effective • Dobson (1989) meta-analysis: a greater degree of change than wait-list, pharmacotherapy, behavior therapy and other psychotherapies
Empirical Status- Depression • Then…Elkin et al. (1989) discovered that cognitive therapy did not perform as well as medication in severely depressed patients • A later report (Elkin et al., 1995) showed even more dismal results • The saga continues…Hollon et al. (1992) found that cognitive therapy performed at least as well as medication, even among the severely depressed • OK, let’s get serious. DeRubeis et al. (1999) performed a mega-analysis from these studies and found cognitive therapy just as effective as medication.
Empirical Status- Depression • Finally, in another placebo-controlled randomized study, Jarrett et al. (1999) found that the two treatments performed equally well. Conclusion? Even in the short run, cognitive therapy is a potent alternative to medication. But does it last?
Empirical Status- Depression • Rush et al. (1977) found that at 12-month follow-up (but not at 6) that CT patients scored lower on depression severity measures than the antidepressant group • Murphy et al. (1984) found patients that received CT during the acute treatment phase were less likely to relapse than those treated with drugs • Hollon et al. (1992) had similar results • Several studies have found that a relatively short course of CT following a successful course of antidepressants is as effective in preventing relapse as is continuing the meds.
Depression- Therapist Behavior • Collaborative Study Psychotherapy Rating Scale (CSPRS) measures therapists’ adherence to CBT model. • CT- Concrete: measures active methods • CT- Abstract measures discussions about CT rationale • DeRubeis & Feeley (1990); Feeley et al. (1999) discovered that CT-Concrete was associated with greater changes in BDI; and CT-Abstract was not • Therefore, it is critical for therapists to focus on problem-solving aspects of CT, at least early on
Depression-Patient Cognitions • Hollon et al. (1988) proposed 3 kinds of changes that occur: • Deactivation – suppress old schema • Accommodation – modify/create new schema • Development of compensatory skills – applying CT skills to future situations
Depression- Patient Cognitions • DeRubeis (1990) studied patients from the Holland et al. (1992) study, found that improvement on the: • Beck Hopelessness Scale • DAS • Attributional Style Questionnaire Play a meditational role. (patients who improved on these measures also had subsequent change in depressive symptoms) Therefore, attributional style and dysfunctional attitudes mediate the reduction of risk of CT
Depression- Patient Cognitions • But….Miranda and Persons (1988) disagreed, stating that the depressive schemata may simply be latent. • So….they developed a negative mood induction procedure prior to administering the DAS. • Segal et al. (1996) found that scores on mood induced DAS predicted relapse, just like Hollon had found. • Measures of changes in compensory skills are less plentiful • Most measures of coping skills came from interests other than CT
Depression- Patient Cognitions • A method is needed to require a patient to PRODUCE rather than RECOGNIZE coping skills. Most patients can recognize them. • Barber and DeRubeis (1992) developed the Ways of Responding (WOR) to address this need. • To measure changes in beliefs as they occur in session (rather than a static measurement) Tang and DeRubeis (1999) developed Patient Cognitive Change Scale.
CT Course of Change • Ilardi and Craighead (1994) observed that 60% - 70% of symptom improvement occurs in the first 4 weeks. But this was inferred from group mean. • Actually….Tang and DeRubeis (1999) report 40% - 60% of change occurs in the first 4 weeks. • Why would this be clinically relevant? • Tang and DeRubeis (1999): In addition to a shorter course, individual therapy gains can be much more sudden than group therapy gains; called “sudden gains” • Occurs among more than 50% of patients • Accounts for more than 50% of total relief
Therapist Patient Alliance • Recent research continues to show a positive relationship between alliance and outcome • Good therapeutic alliance tends to be the RESULT of symptom improvement, rather than a PREDICTOR • So….therapists should adhere to concrete CT, and they will build alliance • This differs from past findings…. • Studies that took the average over time of the alliance, and then correlated it to the outcome
Therapist Patient Alliance • As opposed to measuring it at various points during the therapy process • Beckham (1989), DeRubeis and Feeley (1990), Feeley et al. (1999) found that therapeutic alliance measured early in therapy process did not predict good outcome • Furthermore, DeRubeis and Feeley (1990), Feeley et al. (1999) found that later in therapy, alliance was actually predicted by outcome • Lastly, Tang and DeRubeis (1999) found that alliance in the session prior to the sudden gain was significantly lower as compared to the session after the gain.
Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia • There is also cognitive therapy for OCD, anxiety and hypochondriasis, which follows a similar form to what was just described (for depression).
Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia • The phenomenology and treatment of panic disorder have been well developed: • Patient feels a particular symptom • Attributes it to the start of a panic attack (from experience) • Because he/she thinks it’s pathological, the progression of the panic attack continues • I.e.. chest pain= heart attack • But there are other explanations for these symptoms • I.e.. You will be lightheaded if you get up too fast
Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia • Patient focuses on catastrophic consequences of symptom • ** Patient loses ability to view symptoms objectively*** • This is what turns anxiety into a panic attack • Vicious cycle: fear makes symptoms worse, which makes fear worse, etc. • At this point symptoms seem uncontrollable • This spontaneous attack is a “phobia” of internal conditions
Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia • Recent development in treatment: beware of dependence on safety behaviors • In the mid-eighties, using relaxation or distraction procedures was the norm • This has been recently found to prevent full recovery in certain cases • Because patients think they MUST do them to stop panic attack • Harmless?
Panic Disorder and Agoraphobia Cognitive Therapy Treatment: • Therapist and patient map out vicious cycle • Patient beliefs are identified (i.e.. “If I hyperventilate I will die.”) • Beliefs are challenged using safety behaviors (i.e.. controlled breathing) • Safety behaviors used only to disprove belief • More realistic beliefs are identified • Images experienced by patient are altered