1 / 6

NANC Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group

NANC Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group. May 17, 2005 Co-Chairs Hoke Knox, Sprint Karen Mulberry, MCI. Current FoN Projects Status as of May 11, 2005. Project: VoIP Assignment Criteria.

montrell-seamus
Download Presentation

NANC Future of Numbering (FoN) Working Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. NANCFuture of Numbering(FoN)Working Group May 17, 2005 Co-Chairs Hoke Knox, Sprint Karen Mulberry, MCI

  2. Current FoN ProjectsStatus as of May 11, 2005 FoN WG

  3. Project: VoIP Assignment Criteria • Tasked with development of potential assignment criteria for VoIP providers so that they could obtain numbering resources directly from NANPA. • The FoN needs to extend the time needed to complete its report on the criteria for VoIP providers to be directly assigned numbering resources. • Request that the FoN NANC due date be extended until the July 2005 NANC meeting. • The document will be sent to the NANC as soon as it is completed. FoN WG

  4. Project: NANC LNPA Change Order 399 & 400 Report • Tasked with reviewing NANC Local Number Portability Administration (LNPA) Change Orders 399 and 400 to identify and analyze all policy, regulatory or consumer issues with having them coded into the next NPAC software release per the LNPA-WG’s recommendation • The FoN reviewed the change orders from two perspectives: (1) being coded into the NPAC release but not activated as well as; (2) if they were coded and activated along with the entire new NPAC release package • The FoN did not see any distinguishing characteristics when considering the change orders policy, regulatory and consumer concerns and therefore its analysis was considered to be the same whether the change orders were activated or not. • It was determined that the best approach to analyze the two change orders was to separate them and conduct separate evaluations. FoN WG

  5. Project: NANC LNPA Change Order 399 & 400 Report (con’t) • Change Order 399 Recommendation • The FoN determined that it did not have any policy, regulatory or consumer impacts and should proceed per the recommendation from the NANC LNPA Working Group. • Change Order 400 Recommendation • The FoN report presents supporting and opposing arguments regarding any policy, regulatory and consumer impacts or technical need associated with this change order • The FoN was unable to reach consensus that the change order did not have any policy, regulatory or consumer impacts • The FoN was unable to determine if the change order should proceed per the recommendation from the NANC LNPA Working Group. FoN WG

  6. FoN Meeting Schedule June 7, 2005, 10 AM ET, 4 Hours June 21, 2005, 1 PM ET, 4 Hours July 13, 2005, 11 AM ET, 2 Hours Contact either of the Co-Chairs for complete meeting details Hoke.Knox@mail.sprint.com or karen.mulberry@mci.com (Other meetings for the FoN may be scheduled as needed beyond what has been identified in this list) FoN meeting notes, contributions and documents are posted at www.nanc-chair.org FoN WG

More Related