1 / 33

The involvement of private property in active forest management.  2 case studies in Piedmont

The involvement of private property in active forest management.  2 case studies in Piedmont. Dott.for.Giovanni Maiandi – representitive of Federforeste Piedmont. Arenzano, 27 ottobre 2011. Ownership of forests in Piedmont. fonte: Regione Piemonte – IPLA Spa. Fragmentation = abandon.

morag
Download Presentation

The involvement of private property in active forest management.  2 case studies in Piedmont

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The involvement of private property in active forest management. 2 case studies in Piedmont Dott.for.Giovanni Maiandi – representitive of Federforeste Piedmont Arenzano, 27 ottobre 2011

  2. Ownership of forests in Piedmont fonte: Regione Piemonte – IPLA Spa

  3. Fragmentation = abandon

  4. the reference model

  5. Monte Rosa Foreste association (MRF)

  6. Associative composition

  7. MRF and private property ■large properties planning ■existing associations reactivation ■ small ownershipestablishment of new associations

  8. Attempts to link small private • CONSORTIUM “LORETO - PIANELLE “(Postua) • CONSORTIUM “MONTE TOVO - CASCINE AGNONA” (Borgosesia) • MONTE ROVELLA (Mosso valley) • CERVATTO FOREST CONSORTIUM

  9. CERVATTO FOREST CONSORTIUM

  10. knowledge ofthe area (PFA – Az. I.7) identification of  interesting areas Land register analysis

  11. Animation:action plan Municipality / s engagement owners identification (22 x ca. 40 ha) meetings

  12. animation activities • collaboration MRF - Municipality • 2 meetings • joining of 10 private owners (24 ha) • successful !

  13. What the private owners expect ? • Small income • maintenance of the territory • capacity to take initiatives • ability and clearness in management

  14. First results…

  15. MRF and the private owners knowledge ofthe area (PFA – Az. I.7) identification of  interesting areas Land register analysis meetings owners identification Municipality / s engagement decision CONSTITUTION OF THE ASSOCIATION

  16. Next steps • setting up the consortium • Forest use with income • Targeted forest improvement • implementation of new forest roads

  17. FOREST CONSORTIUM OF VILLAR FOCCHIARDO

  18. FOREST CONSORTIUM OF VILLARFOCCHIARDOLOCATION

  19. FOREST CONSORTIUM OF VILLARFOCCHIARDO Mountain Community “Valle Susa e Val Sangone”

  20. TREND number of members Surface

  21. Composition of members

  22. Peculiarities • Wooldands located in the municipality of Villarfocchiardo and in the surrounding municipalities • Non-profit organization • Possibility to carry out activities for non-members • Public and private owners, farmers • One-off fee of € 30.00. No annual fees.

  23. Staff and administrative and technical structure • No personnel directly employed • Most of the activity is performed by the Board of Directors and supporters. • Engagement of the municipality offices for the financial administration • Technical staff consists of fixed external consultants (freelance)

  24. Activities • Irrigation • Forestry • managing grasslands • Management of rural and forest roads • professional training • Relationships with Park Authority

  25. Incomes • Public founds (PSR 2000 – 2006) • Timber sale • Water fees (for irrigation) • Forestry Equipment Rental

  26. Costs

  27. Peculiarities • respect for the autonomy of the owners • participatory management of land resources • activities on public property and on privatethat  are not able or are not interested in active management

  28. Peculiarities(2) • development local human resources • professional growth local businesses • flexibility (increase silvicultural activities) • Relationships with Park Authority

  29. Thank you! Dott. For.Giovanni Maiandi Representitive of Federforeste Piedmont

More Related