18 LOTS ON 4.53 ACRES

4. 18 LOTS ON 4.53 ACRES

5. REVISED PLAT APPROVED AT PLANNING BOARD

6. TWO PLATS • Original plat and plat featured at Planning Board • Plat featured at Planning Board addressed some lot problems • Will explain the difference between the two • Will explain what conditions/motions had to change to approve newer design

7. CURRENTLY: C-RR3ANNEXATION REQUESTED WITH RLD-IV ZONING

8. DENSITY: 3.97 DWELLINGS/ACRE

9. PARKLAND • NONE PROPOSED • CASH-IN-LIEU REQUIRED IN CONDITION #21

10. 30’ WIDE SECTION OF WRATISLAW WAY SHORT 32’ WIDE ROADS

11. THESE ROADWAYS MEET 32’ STANDARD REVISED PLAT APPROVED AT PLANNING BOARD

12. Original Variance #2 • DELETED BY PLANNING BOARD—NO LONGER NEEDED • CONDITION #2 REWORDED TO ACKNOWLEDGE NEW ROAD WIDTH

13. FUTURE CONNECTION TO NORTH STREAM SIDE GROVE STREET WRATISLAW RENAE COURT RESERVE STREET SHORT STREET

14. FIRE HYDRANTS PROPOSED (SEE CONDITION 11) SHORT

15. SHORT COURT PROPOSED NORTH OF THE CUL-DE-SAC

16. CONDITION #2 • REQUIRES REVIEW OF SHORT COURT • OVERFLOW PARKING AREA MAINTENANCE: REQUIRED IN COVENANTS • 10’ OF ADDITIONAL NON-MOTORIZED ACCESS EASEMENT REQUIRED (SEE FIRST VARIANCE MOTION AS WELL)

17. Planning Board Amendment to Condition #2 • 20’ non-motorized easement needed from cul-de-sac, along the short court, to northern boundary • 5’ sidewalk required in this easement • Easement may be shifted for design flexibility

18. EASEMENT REQUIRED IN PLANNING BOARD CONDITION #2 5’ SIDEWALK TO NORTHERN PROPERTY BOUNDARY

19. CONDITION #4 REQUIRES ADEQUATE DRIVEWAY SIZE FOR LOTS 8-11 • ADEQUATE BACKING AREA ON SHORT COURT ALSO REQUIRED

20. SHARED DRIVEWAY (LOTS 13, 14) PROPOSED SOUTH OF CUL-DE SAC

21. 5’ SIDEWALK INCLUDED IN DESIGN

22. CONDITION #3 • REQUIRES REVIEW OF DRIVEWAY • REQUIRES SIDEWALK REVIEW • REQUIRES SHARED MAINTENANCE OF THE DRIVEWAY (IN COVENANTS)

23. NEW DRIVEWAY REQUIRED FOR EXISTING HOME ON LOT 15.

24. CONDITION #5 • REQUIRES DRIVEWAY FOR HOME ON LOT 15 TO BE REVIEWED, APPROVED AND PAVED PRIOR TO FINAL PLAT APPROVAL

25. SIDEWALKS

26. THE APPLICANT REQUESTED A VARIANCE FROM THE SIDEWALK REQUIREMENT

27. VARIANCE NO LONGER NEEDED • PLAT APPROVED AT PLANNING BOARD SHOWS SIDEWALKS ALONG ALL ROADWAYS • CONDITION #7 REQUIRES BOULEVARD SIDEWALKS ALONG ALL SUBDIVISION ROADWAYS

28. SEVERAL 1’ NO-ACCESS STRIPS

29. CONDITION #6 REQUIRES NO-ACCESS STRIP INFO IN COVENANTS

30. PLANNING BOARD RECOMMENDS ELIMINATION OF LOT 8 IN COVENANT REFERENCE

31. POTENTIAL FOR A PEDESTRIAN CONNECTION

32. LEONARD’S STREAM SIDE GROVE STREET OLD MILWAUKEE WRATISLAW RENAE COURT RESERVE STREET SHORT STREET

33. LEONARD’S STREAM SIDE GROVE STREET OLD MILWAUKEE WRATISLAW RENAE COURT RESERVE STREET SHORT STREET

34. CONDITION #9 • REQUIREMENT FOR A 20’ NON-MOTORIZED PUBLIC ACCESS EASEMENT

35. 20‘ EASEMENT

36. APPARENT LEVEE “STRUCTURE”

38. APPROXIMATE LOCATION OF ACTUAL LEVEE

40. PUBLIC WORKS • RECOMMENDING THAT A DIKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT BEGIN ROUGHLY 15 FEET FROM THE TOE OF THE LEVEE STRUCTURE (CONDITION #15)

41. APPROXIMATE DIKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT

43. 50’ AREA OF RIPARIAN RESOURCE “NO IMPROVEMENT ZONE”

44. CONDITION #15 • REQUIRES THAT THE DIKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT BE DISTINGUISHED FROM THE 50’ AREA OF RIPARIAN RESOURCE ZONE ON THE PLAT

45. CONDITION #16 • REQUIRES THE DIKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT AND THE 50’ NO IMPROVEMENT ZONE TO BE EXPLAINED IN THE COVENANTS

46. CONDITION #18 • PROHIBITS FENCING IN THE 50’ NO IMPROVEMENT ZONE AREA

47. DIKE MAINTENANCE EASEMENT LOCATION REQUIRES LOT ELIMINATION

48. CONDITION #17 • REQUIRES LOTS 1-5 TO BE COMBINED INTO TWO LOTS

49. Planning Board • Recommended deletion of Condition #17 • More space was created west of Wratislaw Way because of lot redesign