1 / 43

Dreaming Big, Being Small

Dreaming Big, Being Small. Taking a DIY Approach to Getting a Medical Device to Market January Luczak, PhD, PEng Principal Consultant, JuLise Consulting Winnipeg Manitoba Canada. Objectives.

morela
Download Presentation

Dreaming Big, Being Small

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Dreaming Big, Being Small Taking a DIY Approach to Getting a Medical Device to Market January Luczak, PhD, PEng Principal Consultant, JuLise Consulting Winnipeg Manitoba Canada

  2. Objectives • To chronicle the progress of a small company’s path towards a functioning, effective quality system for a medical device technology • To provide some DIY tips learned from the experiences, which may be applied across many industries

  3. Outline • Role of a quality system in getting innovation “from bench to bedside” • Establishing the quality system • Phase 1: Ground work • Phase 2: Implementation • Phase 3: Approval (for quality system and product) • Phase 4: Continual improvement • DIY tips – denoted by

  4. Innovative technology - Now what? Role of a quality system in getting innovation “from bench to bedside”

  5. Factors in Managing Innovation • Technological innovation is not enough to ensure market entry… • All factors should be considered throughout product development Business Objectives Customer Requirements Protect IP Regulations

  6. Organized Approach to Innovation Customers • A quality system incorporates all requirements and provides an organized approach to innovation! Product/ Service specifications Business objectives Quality System Input Requirements Regulations Standards

  7. Primary Link between Technology and Market Consumers • Quality System: • Incorporates requirements of consumers and regulators into technology design • Is itself a requirement of numerous jurisdictions Technology Images from: http://medgadget.com/2006/08/forehead_retina_1.html

  8. You NEED a Quality System... • In regions with advanced medical device regulations – e.g., Canada, US, Europe, Australia, Japan: • No quality system = no regulatory approval • No regulatory approval = no market entry Images of flags from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page

  9. You WANT a Quality System... • A quality system is beneficial in many ways • Increased safety and effectiveness of a medical device • Reduced liability exposure • Reduced regulatory exposure • Increased customer satisfaction • Increased consistency in internal operations

  10. Establishing a Quality System Phase 1: Ground work Denotes DIY tip

  11. Case Background • Case: A small company (< 10 employees) has developed a medical device technology and wants to place it on the market • Being a small company, there is... • No formal quality system in place • No documented operating procedures • No experience with obtaining regulatory approval

  12. Where to begin? • Determine what standards and regulations apply to the technology • Key standards for medical devices: ISO 13485:2003 and 14971:2009 • Regulatory bodies publish lists of standards to which they require compliance • Standards exist for most any technology – e.g. involving software, sterilization, electromagnetic radiation

  13. Where to begin? • Take stock: Determine which requirements are already met by internal processes Standards List all requirements Regulations Customers Business objectives Product/ service Define what must be done to meet all requirements

  14. Where to begin? • Take advantage of guidances! • Free and easily accessible • Exist for most any aspect of quality system and regulatory requirements (e.g., FDA, Health Canada) • Global Harmonization Task Force (GHTF) guidances incorporate requirements of several medical device regulations Image from: http://www.ghtf.org/

  15. Where to begin? • Option: Hire consultation • Advises on which standards and regulations the company needs to follow • Helps the company define operating procedures • Assists with applications for regulatory approval

  16. Pros and Cons of Hiring Consultation • Pros: • Provides guidance based on experience • Can bring to light “unwritten rules” • Efficiency • Cons: • Costly • Difficult to find a consultant with directly relevant experience • Some may take advantage...

  17. Developing Core Procedures • Formalized procedures bring together requirements of regulations and standards, and a company’s operation requirements • Processes that may already exist: • Purchasing • Design and Development • Production

  18. Developing Core Procedures • Processes that may not already exist: • Internal Audits • Corrective Action, Preventive Action (CAPA) • Post-market surveillance • Formal management of records and documents, and change control

  19. Customers Product/ Service specifications Business objectives Quality System Input Requirements Regulations Standards

  20. Assigning Responsibilities • Each employee should be delegated responsibilities for quality system requirements that pertain to their positions • There should be a person dedicated to managing the quality system • At least two internal auditors will be needed • Training should take precedence

  21. Assigning Responsibilities • Take a team approach to establishing a quality system • Each employee should be aware of their contributions to the success of the quality system • Employee attitude is the most important factor that can assure an effective quality system!

  22. Establishing a Quality System Phase 2: Implementation Denotes DIY tip

  23. Implementation of Key Processes • In the next slides, focus is on: • Document and Records Management • Change Control • Monitoring and Measurement • Implementation is the most time consuming phase

  24. Document and Record Management • Every regulation and standard contains definitive requirements for documents and records, such as • NB: Design documents and records • Minutes, reports, filled-out forms • Records of distribution and feedback • Documents of external origin, e.g. correspondence with regulators

  25. Change Control • Many types of changes must be controlled, such as • Changes to design • Changes in personnel • Change control = recording changes, reasons for changes, and approval of changes

  26. Monitoring and Measurement • CA must be undertaken when a nonconformity has occurred • PA must be undertaken to prevent a nonconformity from occurring in the future • Internal Audits measure processes effectiveness

  27. Establishing a Quality System Phase 3: Approval – for the product AND quality system Denotes DIY tip

  28. Quality System Certification • Certification to the ISO 13485:2003 standard is necessary for certain jurisdictions, including Canada and the EU • Certification process incorporates specific requirements of those jurisdictions, so that one external audit process can cover all requirements

  29. Quality System Certification • Several conformity assessment bodies exist (aka, registrar or notified body) http://www.intertek-sc.com/index.htm http://www.dekra.com/en/home http://www.saiglobal.com/ http://www.bsiamerica.com/americas/

  30. Regulatory Approval for the Technology • Depending on the regulatory approval sought, approval may entail: • Filling out a license application (Canada) (requires ISO 13485 cert.) • Undergoing an assessment of the technical documentation (requires ISO 13485 cert.) • Premarket approval (PMA) or 510(k) submission (US)

  31. Regulatory Approval for the Technology • It is possible to prepare applications and submissions for regulatory approval without consultation • There are guidances – e.g., FDA offers several guidances on PMA and 510(k) • Consultant may expedite the process

  32. Stats on Regulatory Submissions… • Reported in May 2011: Only 4% of small medical device companies in the US seek FDA approval as the first choice • Small companies are more likely to incur costly and time-consuming difficulties in the 510(k) process • Process takes longer – 330 days vs. 170 days for large companies

  33. Establishing a Quality System Phase 4: Continual improvement Denotes DIY tip

  34. Continual Improvement • Certification, regulatory approvals - • Don’t “rest on your laurels” – keep up the good work! • Improvement of the product AND quality system should be ongoing • Use post-market surveillance, internal audits, and CAPA to identify and address problems and opportunities for improvement

  35. DIY Tips

  36. Summary of DIY Tips • Phase 1: Ground work • Determine what standards and regulations apply to the technology • Take stock • Take advantage of guidances • Delegate responsibilities for quality system requirements to all employees • Training • Team approach

  37. Summary of DIY Tips • Phase 2: Implementation • Pretty much all DIY; only the company’s own employees can put the quality system to work • Perform internal audits to measure the effectiveness of implementation

  38. Summary of DIY Tips • Phase 3: Approval for product AND quality system • Prepare applications and submissions for regulatory approval without consultation • Phase 4: Continual improvement • Use post-market surveillance, internal audits, and CAPA to identify and address problems and opportunities for improvement

  39. End Points

  40. End Points • Initial consultation may be beneficial, but beware… • Consultants should develop procedures based on the company’s needs and processes, and NOT provide generic procedures • Consultants should have directly relevant experience • Guidances are very useful and widely available

  41. End Points • Maintain a positive attitude towards the quality system • It should be viewed as a helpful tool for developing and producing a safe and effective device, rather than as a burden • It should not be implemented just to service auditors/regulators, but rather, embraced as an organized approach to innovation!

  42. Implementation Timeline 1 2 3 4

More Related