1 / 30

QCD for B Physics

QCD for B Physics. Hiroyuki Kawamura (RIKEN). KEK Theory meeting “Toward the New Era of Particle Physics ” Dec.12 2007. B Physics. Flavor mixing + CP violation via weak interaction. NP search by (over)constraining “unitarity triangle”. HFAG: LP07. QCD for B Physics.

morela
Download Presentation

QCD for B Physics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. QCD for B Physics Hiroyuki Kawamura (RIKEN) KEK Theory meeting “Toward the New Era of Particle Physics ” Dec.12 2007

  2. B Physics Flavor mixing + CP violation via weak interaction NP search by (over)constraining “unitarity triangle” HFAG: LP07

  3. QCD for B Physics • Extraction of |VCKM| and φCP from hadronic weak decays requires a good understanding of QCD effects. ex. (semi-leptonic decay) • QCD effects are even necessary for “direct CP violation” — phase is detected through quantum interference ex. (hadronic decay) + T (tree) P (penguin)

  4. Theoretical tools Light flavor symmetry: isospin, SU(3) symmetry, … ex. isospin analysis for B → ππ etc. MNP Λ/mb expansion ↔ separation of scales (factorization) This talk Mw Heavy quark effective theory (HQET) perturbative QCD factorization for inclusive semi-leptonic decay mb QCD factorization for exclusive hadronic decay μ Soft-Collinear effective theory Λ Lattice simulation Light-cone sum rule (quark hadron duality, spectral function,OPE,…)

  5. HQET Heavy-light meson system • Can be described by an effective field theory which includes only soft modes of “large component “of Q + soft quarks + soft gluon Mw HQET field: QCD mb μ HQET Perturbative matching with full QCD (αs(mb) small) : Λ Wilson coeff. Leading term : SU(2Nf) Spin-Flavor symmetry

  6. Meson spectrum

  7. Exclusive semi-leptonic decays heavy-heavy form factor Isgur-Wise function At the “zero-recoil limit” :

  8. Experimental result LP07 Extrapolation of the data to ω=1 2007 WA ⇓

  9. Inclusive semi-leptonic decays total rate ↔ OPE (short distance expansion) 1 propagator ⇒

  10. Moments vs. |Vcb| & HQET parameters Buchmuller & Flacher (‘05) Moment → Vcb & HQET parameters ⇓ (kinetic energy)

  11. B→ Xulν differential rate kinematical cuts to avoid Xc background. ex. → outgoing jet has low virtuality (sensitive to soft physics) propagator non-local for b-quark residual momentum: shape function scale of outgoing jet : Factorization Korchemsky, Sterman (’94)

  12. B→ Xulν Shape function: new non-perturbative object — ME of Light-cone non-local operator (similar to parton distribution) Strategies for extracting |Vub| from B → Xulν Lange, Neubert ,Paz (’05) 1. Fit S(ω) from B → Xsγ, use it for B → Xulν 2. Use “shape-function free ” relation between B → Xsγand B → πlν Leibovich,Low,Rothstein (‘99) ex. Lange, Neubert ,Paz (’05) : weight function (calculated at 2-loop) : residual hadronic power corrections

  13. |Vub| from BaBar data ”SF free” analysis by Golubev, Skovpen, Luth : hep-ph/0702072v2 LLR: Leibovich,Low,Rothstein (’99) ↔ 1-loop, without rhc LNP: Lange, Neubert ,Paz (’05) error: exp.(Xulν) +exp. (Xsγ) + th.

  14. Exclusive hadronic decays 4-fermi operators Effective Hamiltonian Naïve factorization from “color transparency” argument, but no μ dependence • QCD factorization holds for decays in which the spectator quark is absorbed into the final heavy meson. Beneke, Buchalla, Neubert, Sachrajda (’00) π T0,8 Фπ B D FB→π

  15. B→Dπ What must be shown? — gluon exchange between (B,D) and π • Soft div. cancel among diagrams • Collinear div. absorbed into universal pion wave function — shown up to 2-loop by BBNS (’00) All-order proof was given using SCET : Bauer et al. (‘01) SCET (Soft-Collinear effective theory) HQET (soft) + collinear modes of quark & gluon + … light-like vector — systematic expansion in — soft mode decouple with col. modes from power counting → Factorization proved at the leading power in operator language

  16. B→ππ, Kπ Key point: B → π form factor asymptotic form — end-point singularity ↔ soft nature of spectator quarks — “hard-collinear scale” 3 formalisms have been developed in recent years (1) QCDF (BBNS:’99 - ) end-point singularity included in the form factor. proof given by SCET. power corrections partly included (parameterized) NLO calculation completed B → M1 M2

  17. B→ππ, Kπ (2) SCET (BPSR ’04-) Bauer, Pirjol, Stewart, Rothstein end-point singularity included in the form factor hard-collinear scale distinguished. → different formula from (1) power correction neglected modest → large number of fitted input (3) PQCD (’01-) Li, Kuem, Sanda, Kurimoto, Mishima, Nagashima, , , kT factorization + Sudakov →end-point suppressed power counting different from (1) & (2). more predictive power NLO calculation has started b:impact parameter

  18. Theory (QCDF) vs. Data Beneke (Beauty06) • Good agreement with B → PP, PV data except “πK puzzle” and large direct CP of π+π- (input set S4: Beneke &Neubert (’03)) BPRS, PQCD are also good. How can different formalism can give similar prediction?

  19. CKM phase from data Beneke (Beauty06) Average: UT fit

  20. B meson LCWF Operator definition light-cone vector: momentum rep. momentum of light quark (at tree level) In SCET soft fields col. fields Hard radiative tail Complicated object which contains soft + “hard” dynamics

  21. Operator relations Kodaira, Tanaka, Qiao, HK (’01) HQ symmetry + EOM → 3-body ops. “Solution” “Wandzura-Wilczek approx.” — “Twist = Dimension - Spin” is not a good quantum number — Higher dim. operators appear in IR region (at large tΛ) “enhanced power correction” Lee,Neubert,Paz (’06) Shape Function

  22. Radiative corrections Lange & Neubert (’03), Braun et al,(03), Li & Liao (’04), Lee & Neubert (’05) 1-loop Cusp singularity → hard radiative tail non-analytic at t=0 UV & IR structure different!

  23. Evolution equation Consistent with Lange & Neubert (’03)

  24. Operator product expansion Separation of UV & IR behavior ⇒ OPE Interpolate B meson LCWF to HQET parameters RG evolution for LCWF 1-loop matching RG evolution for local ops. many higher-dim. ops expansion parameter

  25. Operator product expansion (cont’d) Lee & Neubert PRD72(’05)094028 : Cut-off scheme up to dim-4 ops. → OPE + exponential ansatz “hybrid model” Our calculation (HK & K.Tanaka) MS-bar scheme up to dim-5 ops. +

  26. Calculation 2-point + 3-point functions with non-local operators • Operator identification calculation inx-space • Keep gauge invariance explicitly background method + Fock-Schwinger gauge → decouple from Wilson line

  27. Result dim.3 dim.4 dim.5

  28. : decay constant Matrix elements dim.3 dim.4 dim.5 (covariant tensor formalism) “Chromo-electronic” “Chromo-magnetic”

  29. LCWF from OPE dim.3 dim.4 dim.5 Dim.3&4 terms reproduce the results in cut-off scheme by Lee & Neubert (’05) ↔ Lattice, QCD sum rule Represented by HQET parameter: Evolution & phenomenological studies underway!

  30. Summary • Understanding of QCD effects in B physics has been largely improved in recent years. • B meson wave function for exclusive B decay is quite different from pion wave function. different UV & IR structures • OPE for bilocal operator for B meson LCWF to dim.5 → expressed by 3 HQET parameters Model-independent study of B meson LCWF is underway. Similar analysis for shape function is ongoing.

More Related