1 / 7

SCUOLA CNR DEI DIPARTIMENTI DSFTM-DSCTM

Explore the ongoing reorganization process in CNR-SPIN to optimize research activities. Discuss the impact on administration, website improvements, and aligning with Horizon 2020 framework.

morina
Download Presentation

SCUOLA CNR DEI DIPARTIMENTI DSFTM-DSCTM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCUOLA CNR DEI DIPARTIMENTI DSFTM-DSCTM http://www.dmd-sptm.it/

  2. Unita’ Operativa di SupportoCNR-SPIN L’Aquila Dr. Silvia Picozzi Johan Hellsvik Aq Ch Evgeny Plekhanov

  3. PEOPLE • Alessandro Ciattoni (RIC III liv., perm.) •  non-linear optics • Carlo Rizza (AR - Univ. Insubria) • Luca Ottaviano (RIC. UnivAq)  graphene, organic materials • Gianni Profeta (Ric. UnivAq) •  DFT for superconductors • Fabio Ricci (AR) • Silvia Picozzi (RIC II liv., permanent) => DFT (+ Many body) for ferroelectrics and magnetic) • Alessandro Stroppa (Research Technologist, permanent) • Paolo Barone (Ric TD, III liv) • Evgeny Plekhanov(AR) • Marco Scarrozza (AR) • Domenico Di Sante (Dott.) • Emilie Bruyer (AR) • Muizz Pradipto (AR)

  4. PROJECTS Project type Project Title Main co- ordinator SPIN Coord. Grant (k€)

  5. PREVIOUS “INSTITUTIONAL” LOCATION

  6. GENERAL COMMENTS FROM AQ • We’re happy in the “commessa” where we were! • We’re confident that we can find a new “commessa” where we’re as happy as we were! • We suggest avoiding complex procedures in the reorganization process: boundary conditions still seem rather vague …. • We may suggest few and generic “containers” (still characterizing our core-activities): • Magnetism and other ferroic orders • Superconductivity • Physics and systems of low dimensionality • “Other advanced materials and devices” • This can be surely qualified as expected, trivial, vague… on the other hand, it is difficult to make definite choices without money! • Better to leave the researchers as free as possible to apply for new calls that may appear from time to time Fancy names: Nanoferronics, Valleytronics, etc

  7. QUESTIONS • What is the reorganization process primarily aimed at? • To make people better understand what we’re doing (i.e. website)? • NB: We’re not so much convinced that any reorganization should comply/help with the Horizon 2020 framework …. • How is the scientific reorganization going to affect or match with the CNR-SPIN administration ? • Comment from RUOS: we have to make things work !! • Reminder: • Presently: COMMESSE inter UOS, but MODULI are intra-UOS ! Let’s discuss !

More Related