1 / 20

Vocabulary measures in a Language Framework

Vocabulary measures in a Language Framework. James Milton University of Wales Swansea, UK. Outline. What is the CEFR and what is it and its framework of levels meant to do? Does it do it? What happens when you fit vocabulary size measures into it?

morna
Download Presentation

Vocabulary measures in a Language Framework

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Vocabulary measures in a Language Framework James Milton University of Wales Swansea, UK

  2. Outline • What is the CEFR and what is it and its framework of levels meant to do? • Does it do it? • What happens when you fit vocabulary size measures into it? • What aspects of L1 vocabulary knowledge could usefully be put into a Language of the School Framework?

  3. The Council of Europe says of the FL Framework: Developed through a process of scientific research and wide consultation, this document provides a practical tool for settingclear standards to be attained at successive stages of learning and for evaluating outcomes in an internationally comparable manner. The Framework provides a basis for the mutual recognition of language qualifications, thus facilitating educational and occupational mobility. It is increasingly used in the reform of national curricula and by international consortia for the comparison of language certificates. A recent European Union Council Resolution (November 2001) recommended the use of this Council of Europe instrument in setting up systems of validation of language competences.

  4. CEF and Council of Europe levels

  5. Approach to levels description • [the CEFR] should describe a full range of language knowledge, use and skills … • The approach adopted is action-orientated • Language use comprises the actions performed by persons • (no similar discussion exists for knowledge or skills – at least, not in the Framework document)

  6. ALTE “Can Do” descriptors Vantage Level – B2

  7. CEF document - Vantage … sustain his opinions in discussion providing … relevant explanations, arguments and comment … construct a chain of reasoned argument … … more than holding your own in discourse …converse naturally, fluently and effectively, understand in detail what is said … keep the turn whilst formulating … [converse] without unintentionally amusing or irritating [native-speakers] … able to self correct.. Relate own contributions skilfully to those of other speakers. Can use circumlocution and paraphrase to cover gaps in lexical knowledge

  8. CEF and Cambridge ESOL levels

  9. CEF and other FL exams

  10. Vocabulary and competence • There is a strong relationship between word frequency and the likelihood that a word will be learned • Frequent words contribute disproportionately to text coverage • Coverage is strongly connected to comprehension and language competence • A strong relationship between vocabulary size and language level (reading and writing) • English and French are very similar

  11. Coverage plus French 95-98% coverage = full comprehension 80% coverage = gist comprehension

  12. CEF and vocabulary levels

  13. CEF and vocabulary levels

  14. Explaining the difference • The existing levels descriptors can disguise very different competence across languages • The Framework is not robust enough to allow meaningful equivalences between language level and exams to be drawn with confidence • The “can do” descriptors are too bland • A Framework, if it is to be useful, MUST be more robust if it is to have credibility • Vocabulary measure can (help) add this • They can work just as well in L1 as in FLs

  15. L1 vocabulary growth • Very young learners learn 50 – 350 words in the holophrastic phase • At age 3 – 500-1000 words in active vocabulary • Age 6 – 2500-5000 lemmas • Learners add 1000-3000 words per year • University entrants in UK - c.9,000 word families • Graduate students in UK – c.13,000 word families • Quick and easy tests in construction and use

  16. Using this information • Build a framework of vocabulary size • Annual growth • At Keystages – minimum lexical knowledge tied to competences • identifying cognitive rather than chronological development – predicts academic success • identifying social disadvantage • the appropriate loading and sequencing of teaching materials

  17. Using this information • identifying readiness of higher study • University entry • Ability to read books in a canon or textbooks Shrek – 6000 words 95% coverage 20th Century English fiction – 8-9000 words Textbook – 10-12000+ words for 95% coverage

  18. Understanding multilingual performance • Young multilingual students often characterised as slow in LE development – may be the effect of growing 2 lexicons • Possible to understand and compensate for the learning pressure of two languages • Can suggest solutions • Bilinguals often lack the lexis in English Academic vocabulary (AWL - 570 words outside the most frequent 2000 words which contribute 8.5% to coverage)

  19. Conclusion • Vocabulary measures are not normally considered by school language teachers or included in school standards frameworks • vocabulary measurements could be included in such frameworks • the lesson of the foreign language framework is that it would be very much to the benefit of a framework system if they were • And they can offer many other useful insights

More Related