1 / 27

SCOTUS

SCOTUS. Chapter 12. Supreme Court of the United States. Important functions: Judicial Review Resolving conflicts among states or between a state and the federal gov’t. Maintaining national supremacy in law, and ensuring uniformity in the interpretation of laws. SCOTUS.

morosco
Download Presentation

SCOTUS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SCOTUS Chapter 12

  2. Supreme Court of the United States • Important functions: • Judicial Review • Resolving conflicts among states or between a state and the federal gov’t. • Maintaining national supremacy in law, and ensuring uniformity in the interpretation of laws.

  3. SCOTUS • Supreme Court is the ultimate court of appeals in the United States. • Great majority of SCOTUS cases come from lower federal courts, but cases may be appealed from state courts if they involve “a substantial federal question.” • Very few cases arise under original jurisdiction. (ambassadors, state v. state, state v. U.S.)

  4. U.S. Supreme Court 9 Justices serve on Supreme Court • 1 Chief Justice • 8 Associate Justices • Life Term (Size of the Court is not set in Constitution, but determined by Congress.)

  5. SCOTUS • Their power to hear a case is discretionary. If the Supreme Court chooses to not hear a case, the lower court ruling stands. • They don’t have to give any rationale for why they have chosen not to hear a case…but sometimes they do. • “Rule of Four”- 4 justices must agree before Court grants review of a case

  6. SCOTUS • Writ of Certiorari--formal document that orders a lower court to send up the records of a case for review by SCOTUS • Most common way for the Court to put a case on its docket. Court must grant Cert in cases involving constitutionality of a law.

  7. U.S. Supreme Court

  8. Supreme Court Session • Session begins first Monday of October each year and usually continues through June. • Justices meet in conference weekly to • Discuss list of cases (screened by clerks) and decide what they will hear (Rule of Four) • Discuss cases that have been argued before the Court and reach a decision • SCOTUS receives and disposes of approx. 5-9,000 cases a year. Many cases are decided by per curiam opinion--a short, unsigned Court ruling.

  9. Session • Cases are heard with all the Justices sitting together in open court (en banc.) • Court hears oral arguments (30 minutes from each side) in 2-week cycles. Solicitor General is the attorney representing U. S. in cases involving the federal gov’t. • Justices receive written briefs (statements of legal arguments, relevant facts, and precedents)from both sides beforehand. Interested parties that aren’t litigants may submit amicus curiae (“friend of the court”) briefs.

  10. Session Supreme Court hears about 150 cases of national importance each year, and 3/4ths of such decisions are announced in full, published opinions. Majority Opinion- expresses legal reasoning behind decision for future legal reference ConcurringOpinion-written to support majority opinion, but to also stress different Constitutional or legal basis for judgement Dissenting Opinion- written by justices opposed to all or part of the majority’s decision

  11. Session Vast majority of cases are settled on principle of Stare Decisis(“let the decision stand”)—earlier decision should hold for the case being considered. All courts rely heavily on precedent--the way similar cases were handled in the past—to guide current decisions. Lower courts are expected to follow the precedents of highers courts

  12. U.S. Supreme Court

  13. Justices of the Supreme Court • Nine Justices: Eight Associate Justices led by a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. His/her main duty is administrational and ceremonial. • Nomination and confirmation can sometimes become very “political” • Conservative, Moderate, Liberal

  14. Politics of Judicial SelectionAppointments influenced by:A) Political ideology / PartisanshipB) Interest groupsC) Other JusticesD) Senators

  15. John G. Roberts, Jr. • Chief Justice • Born in 1955 • J.D. Harvard Law • U.S. Court of Appeals for DC in 2003 (GWB) • George W. Bush nominated him as Chief Justice in 2005 [78-22] • Roman Catholic

  16. Antonin Scalia • Associate Justice • Born in 1936 • LL.B Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1982 (Reagan) • Ronald Reagan nominated him in 1986 [98-0] • Roman Catholic

  17. Anthony M. Kennedy • Associate Justice • Born in 1936 • LL.B Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals 9th Circuit in 1975 (Ford) • Ronald Reagan nominated him in 1988 [97-0] • Roman Catholic

  18. Clarence Thomas • Associate Justice • Born in 1948 • J.D. Yale • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (GHWB) • George H.W. Bush nominated him in 1991 [52-48] • Roman Catholic

  19. Ruth Bader Ginsburg • Associate Justice • Born in 1933 • LL.B Columbia • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (Carter) • Bill Clinton nominated her in 1993 [96-3] • Jewish

  20. Steven G. Breyer • Associate Justice • Born in 1938 • LL.B. Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals D.C. in 1980 (Carter) • Bill Clinton nominated him in 1994 [87-9] • Jewish

  21. Samuel A. Alito, Jr. • Associate Justice • Born in 1950 • J.D. Yale • U.S. Court of Appeals 3rd Circuit in 1990 (GHWB) • George W. Bush nominated in 2006 [58-42] • Roman Catholic

  22. Sonia Sotomayor • Associate Justice • Born in 1954 • J.D. Yale • U.S Court of Appeals 2nd Circuit in 1998 (Clinton) • Barack Obama nominated her in 2009 [68-31] • Roman Catholic

  23. Elena Kagan • Associate Justice • Born in 1960 • J.D. Harvard • U.S. Court of Appeals (expired) • Solicitor General represents U.S. in cases before S.C. • Obama nominated her in 2010 [63-37] • Jewish

  24. Shaping Public Policy Historically, SCOTUS decisions have tended to reflect changing social conditions and the attitudes of the times. * In early years under Chief Justice John Marshall, Court expanded scope of federal gov’t. and defined commerce power. *Between 1835 and Civil War, Court rulings emphasized States’ rights and rights of citizens. * Under Chief Justice Earl Warren (1953-1969), Court focused on protecting civil liberties.

  25. Shaping Public Policy Supreme Court uses 3 tools to influence national policy: Judical Review-Court validates or cancels laws and actions of gov’t institutions at local, state and national levels. Through its interpretation of laws, the Court determines how policy will be carried out on a daily basis across the nation. By overturning earlier decisions, the Court adapts the law to changing circumstances and social values.

  26. Shaping Public Policy Judicial Activism: Belief that Supreme Court justices should actively make policy and sometimes redefine the Constitution. Maintain it is best branch for defending individuals’ rights and protecting the weak. “We are under a Constitution, but the Constitution is what judges say it is.” Charles Evans Hughes. Judicial Restraint: Belief that justices should not actively try to shape social and political issues or redefine the Constitution. Maintains that unelected judges are the least democratic branch of gov’t.

  27. SCOTUS Limits Court may not initiate legal action, only decide cases brought before it. Must rely on other gov’t. institutions to enforce its rulings. Justices must base their decisions on legal principles, not their personal feelings. Executive and Legislative Branches provide checks and balances.

More Related