1 / 18

An IP named DeSIRE

An IP named DeSIRE. Tom Anderson. Pisa Workshop, 25-27 November 2002. Dependability in FP6. “Dependability” is desperately needed in IST

morrie
Download Presentation

An IP named DeSIRE

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. An IP named DeSIRE Tom Anderson Pisa Workshop, 25-27 November 2002

  2. Dependability in FP6 • “Dependability” is desperately needed in IST • Emerging IST systems will offer:unprecedented performance, functionality, connectivity, mobility, ubiquity, autonomy, heterogeneity, maybe even transparency! • But if we cannot depend on them? If they are prone to failure? Riddled with errors? Susceptible to accidental faults and malicious attacks? • Much as they are now? • An Opportunity for Europe.

  3. Lessons from the Past Ariane V Certain proprietary systems ATC system development etc.

  4. Now is the Hour • Concern (even fear) of attacks:“homeland security” • Infrastructure dependency and interdependency • Individual and societal dependency • Recognition of system life-cycle costs • International political recognition • European platform

  5. Comprehensive Dependability Whatever service requirements are demanded, a dependable system must deliver. Consequently we are concerned with: • all techniques • at all stages of development • to deal with all fault sources and threats • in all sectors • to deliver all facets of service: • security, privacy, self-healing, … • safety, integrity, … • reliability, availability, …

  6. AMSD Accompanying Measure in System Dependability FP5.8 KAII Roadmapping project June 2002 - May 2003

  7. AMSD Partners Univ. Newcastle Co-ordinator Adelard Overall roadmap ARC Seibersdorf DES Roadmap & workshop CNUCE/ISTI - Univ. Pisa Partner JRC Workshops CNRS/LAAS Partner

  8. AMSD Objectives • Overall Dependability Roadmap • consult and synthesize from other roadmapping workshops • Dependable Embedded System Roadmap • Constituency and Consensus-Building, for • ISDI (Information Society Dependability Initiative)

  9. AMSD Positioning DDSIDependability policy support AMSD Overall dependability AMSD dependable embedded systems ARTIST advncd. RT BVNbiometrics PAMPASmobileprivacy &security ACIPcritical infrastruct.protection STORKcrypto RAPIDprivacy/IdentityMgmt RESETsmartcards Others…..

  10. IST Workprogramme 2003-4 Draft of 14/11/02 Section 3.1 First call - Strategic Objectives 3.1.5 Towards a global dependability and security framework Focus — development of integrated interdisciplinary approaches and ensuing technologies for the provision of dependable network and information systems that underpin our economy and society

  11. IP & NoE Arising from the AMSD consensus and community building we propose a coordinated IP and NoE to address 3.1.5 DeSIRE:Dependability of Systems and Information infrastructures – Research and Exploitation DeFINE:Dependability Foundations for Information infrastructures – Network of Excellence

  12. Other IPs & NoEs • Security NoE – ENORICS • Privacy IP – PIMIP • Mobile/Pervasive – [PAMPAS] • Embedded IP – DECOS (2nd Call) • Middleware –

  13. DeSIRE DeSIRE represents what we want (from IST) DeSIRE could consist of: • Technology • Case Studies • Tools and Components • Support Measures

  14. DeSIRE – Technology • fault prevention • rigorous design and structuring • fault tolerance • of accidental and malicious faults • fault removal • verification and validation • fault forecasting • system evaluation and assessment

  15. DeSIRE – Case Studies Examples of possible application domains • Aerospace • e-Business • Health informatics • Utilities

  16. DeSIRE – Tools and Components • Support for dependability cases • Intrusion management • Fault management • Modelling of interdependencies • Modelling of socio-technical systems

  17. DeSIRE – Support Measures • Support for dependability policy making • Enhanced education and training for IST dependability engineers • Assessment of dependability technology • Deployment of best dependability practice

  18. One view of DeSIRE Application Studies Tools and Components Support Measures | | Modelling And Simulation Dependability Case Support Training, Best Practice Healthcare Aerospace Infrastructure Inter- dependencies Dependability Policy Support Intrusion Management e-Business Fault Prevention Fault Removal Fault Tolerance Fault Forecasting

More Related