330 likes | 440 Views
Comparison of land usage of KNU Between 2006 and 2010. 2005014001 지리학과 강인수 2006034284 경영학부 이동구 2008014028 지리학과 쳔하오. Contents. Introduction Reason why chose the Subject Introduce about KNU Main Subject Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU Automatic analysis + Individual analysis Field Survey
E N D
Comparison of land usage of KNUBetween 2006and 2010 2005014001 지리학과 강인수 2006034284 경영학부 이동구 2008014028 지리학과쳔하오
Contents • Introduction • Reason why chose the Subject • Introduce about KNU • Main Subject • Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU • Automatic analysis + Individual analysis • Field Survey • Result analysis • Conclusion • How to use the result • Power of Remote Sensing
INTRO • There are many small and big changes in KNU • Entrance of Global Plaza, BTL Dorm, Techno building, East gate – Law school, extension of College of social science and so on • By using the remote sensing tool, we will figure out how many changes are done
About KNU • Kyungpook National University Slogan : Truth · Pride · Service Establishment : 1946. 5.28 Type : National President : Ham, In suk Nation : Republic of Korea Location : Gyeongbuk National Univ., Sangyeok 3-dong, Buk-gu, Daegu, Korea(Main campus)The number of student : undergraduate -28,170(2010)graduate school : 6,640(2010) Teaching staff : 1,118(2010) Symbol : Cheomseongdae
Main Subject • Comparison of land usage of KNU between 2006 and 2010
BIG 5 Changes 1. Entrance of Techno Building and BTL dormitory
BIG 5 Changes 2. Global Plza (GP)
BIG 5 Changes 3. East Gate + extension of College of social science + Entrance of Law school
BIG 5 Changes 4. Entrance of parking lot at college of IT Engineering 2
BIG 5 Changes 5. Faculty Apartment
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU Raster Attribute Editor 2006 & 2010 KNU
Comparison 2006 & 2010 KNU 2006 2010 forest : 38.93 % road : 27.48 % water : 0.45 % open : 8.40 % building : 24.74 % Total : 100 % • forest : 43.12 % • road : 25.18 % • water : 0.46 % • open : 8.65 % • building : 22.59% • Total : 100 % * Round off at three decimal places
Conclusion • Thanks to the Remote Sensing tool, We can display very objective figures how changed the usage of land by entrance of buildings in KNU • Compared to the field survey, • It is convenient to access the spot. If field survey can’t approach the spot, but remote sensing can
Conclusion • Fast, objective, save money & time. • Very useful to keep the information • Remote Sensing is very powerful tool • It can be used many kinds of information