320 likes | 331 Views
This week in lab - trip to Green Oaks! - dress appropriately (sturdy shoes, long pants, etc.). Arrive promptly at lab - need to leave quickly. Studying diversity of forest trees in 2 habitats. Last day… started talking about systematics: study of relationships between organisms & their
E N D
This week in lab - trip to Green Oaks! - dress appropriately (sturdy shoes, long pants, etc.) Arrive promptly at lab - need to leave quickly
Last day… started talking about systematics: study of relationships between organisms & their classification & naming Defined 3 types of possible groups that can be created from the taxa that are arranged in a phylogeny
Most systematists today try to use only monophyletic groups in classification, but traditional classifications often include paraphyletic groups
Paraphyletic groups are most controversial - usually considered ‘bad’, but still frequently used • e.g. ‘reptiles’ or ‘Reptilia’ Share many characters, but mostly ancestral…
What does a ‘tree’ represent? Relationships between taxa What does the horizontal axis represent? Relative time since taxa split (sometimes absolute time or genetic distance)
Phylogeny often has branches at top What does ‘x’ axis represent? nothing….
Branches can be rotated without changing meaning, only branching pattern is important
Phylogenies constructed using similarities between species, because related species are expected to share most traits
If two taxa share many traits, we expect them to be closely related • alternative: same characters occur in unrelated spp.; • character may have evolved multiple times Not impossible! Convergent evolution… Actually, Alluaudia
Try to use only homologous characters: characters whose similarity is due to inheritance from a common ancestor • recognized by detailed • similarity in structure, • organization, development, • etc. (but not always easy!)
However, we assume it is more likely that shared characters indicate related species Principle of Parsimony suggests simplest explanation preferred Most parsimonious phylogeny has characters evolving fewest times possible (Mutations and evolutionary change assumed to be relatively rare) William of Ockham, of Occam’s Razor fame
e.g. mosses & tracheophytes share many characters • if not closely • related, those • characters • would each have • to evolve twice, • many more • evolutionary • changes Instead, we assume they are closely related
Not all characters are equally useful for indicating relationships - e.g number of legs in mammals Try grouping cats, whales, deer, bats & rodents based on # of legs…
Can’t group mammals that have 4 legs together because ancestor had 4 legs… all mammal groups inherited this trait Shared ancestral traits are not useful
Instead, try to use shared derived traits: traits that have been modified from ancestral trait since the group started evolving (AKA synapomorphies) Modification of front legs into flippers, hind legs reduced to vestigial bones can be used as shared derived trait for whales
To determine ancestral trait, examine outgroups: taxa that are not part of the focal group but are closely related
Look at an example of constructing a phylogeny Phylogenies built by finding which taxa share the largest number of derived traits
An example… ‘bird-hipped’ dinosaurs
What sort of characters can be used in phylogenetic analysis? • almost anything that can be measured and has a • genetic basis • some characters more useful than others because • more or less stable, or easier to compare • may depend on breadth of study (for phylogeny of • a phylum use slow-evolving characters, • for phylogeny of a genus use fast-evolving • characters)
Morphological characters • easy to measure, many traits available • usually onlycharacters available for fossils, if used • can combine modern & fossil taxa in analysis
Developmental characters Essentially morphological, but traits seen in embryo may disappear in adult
Behavioral characters Variable, may be hard to compare but can add much potential information e.g. duck courtship displays King Eiders
Different wasp families differ in their nest structures Crabronidae Vespidae
Molecular characters • Probably most current studies use molecular characters • potential characters include: • enzyme frequencies • use electrophoresis to determine variation
Amino acid sequence of proteins • Each position • in sequence is • a character • having same • amino acid • is a shared • trait Must align sequences first…
DNA hybridization • compares similarity of whole strands of DNA from • 2 spp. by how tightly they bond together • heat DNA until 2 strands separate, when cooled they • join together again in double helix
DNA from 2 different species will form hybrid DNA, but will separate again at lower temperatures
Which of these pairs do you think is most closely related? A) American Black Bear & Asiatic Black Bear B) Sloth Bear & Spectacled Bear C) Grizzly Bear & Polar Bear American Black Bear Sloth Bear Grizzly Bear Asiatic Black Bear Spectacled Bear Polar Bear
Phylogeny must be based on overall DNA similarity (measured by dissociation temperature), not by number of shared characters