80 likes | 174 Views
WBS 1.4 AGS Upgrade - Summary (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency) 3 Dec 2004. Jan 04 4 Nov 04 Change 2 Dec 04 Change(11/2-12/2) 1.4.1 AGS/Booster $ 3,562 $15,184K + $11,624K $15,086K - $ 98K 1.4.2 Switchyard $ 0 $ 3,244K + $ 3,244K $ 3,273K + $ 29K
E N D
WBS 1.4 AGS Upgrade - Summary (Direct Costs, FY05$’s, No Contingency) 3 Dec 2004 Jan 04 4 Nov 04Change 2 Dec 04Change(11/2-12/2) • 1.4.1 AGS/Booster $ 3,562 $15,184K + $11,624K $15,086K - $ 98K • 1.4.2 Switchyard $ 0 $ 3,244K + $ 3,244K $ 3,273K + $ 29K • 1.4.3 K0PI0 $ 5,573K $ 6,960K + $ 1,387K $ 7,002K + $ 42K • 1.4.4 MECO $ 4,773K $ 7,634K + $ 2,861K $ 7,692K + $ 58K • 1.4.5 Project Office $ 0 $ 1,035K + $ 1,035K $ 1,059K + $ 24K DIRECT TOTAL $13,908K $34,057K + $20,149K $34,114K + $ 55K Total with Cont’ and Indirect $21,268(est) $52,080K + $30,082K $51,616K - $464K • 1.4.1.6 Beam Development --- not included • Not much change – • new labor rates (slightly higher) • Corrected indirects for AGS CAPS • Revised (lower) costs for AGS/Booster PFN’s for WBS 1.4.1 • Cost scrubbing for other AGS/Booster high cost systems in progress AGS RSVP Home Page: http://server.c-ad.bnl.gov/esfd/RSVP/RSVP_AGS_WBS.htm
RSVP AGS Project Costs, with indirects 11/4/04 (Nov 04 AGS Review, v21)
Present Cost Estimate with 5 year beam development plus 1 year contingency AGS RSVP Infrastructure - Costsv24 12/3/04
Present Cost Estimate with 3 year beam development and no contingency (The direction we are heading) AGS RSVP Infrastructure - Costsv24 12/3/04
our present plan/work(subject to change – i.e. we have not yet received guidance from Willis/Kotcher as result of 4-5 Nov AGS Review • Continue cost scrubbing and schedule development • Highest priority to AGS/BOOSTER WBS 1.4.1 • Cost scrubbing, what can we postpone until operations phase? etc… • Schedule – in particular a plan to get the AGS/BOOSTER in shape for high intensity beam development --- by beginning of 3rd year of construction? • Beam development plan that fits within constant effort RHIC budget scenario with 2 beams – i.e. figure on 80 hrs/week and 15 weeks/year • Case 1: Beam development during entire 5 year construction period • Case 2: Beam development beginning 3rd year of construction • The construction plan should be developed consistent with no beam development in first two years of the project (Case 2 above) • D-line decommissioned • C-Line available beginning of 3rd year for tests • there’s a risk (small) that we may have to revert back to the original plan (Case 1).
Cost Scrubbing(as of 12/3/04) Reviewing each system with peers in department. Systems reviewed so far# (all AGS/Booster WBS): • Booster/AGS PFN upgrades ($876K $648K)## • First pass at shield caps for AGS and Booster ($3.57M lower ??, needs R&D) • AGS Coils ($644K $631K) • AGS H20 electrostatic septum ($589K up?) • AGS F5 Thin Magnetic Septum ($691K up?) In addition, • eliminated redundancies in project support costs (-$145K) • New cost estimates developed for RF cavities (not scrubbed, $2.0M $2.1M) # Represents ~$8M of $15M direct costs (w/o cont’) for the AGS/Booster WBS ## Included in v24 cost estimate
BNL Contributions • $100M/year RHIC operations base to allow low cost operations for RSVP • Building 912 roof repairs ($2,000,000 – GPP funds, FY04-05)