1 / 19

TAP Hunter: A SVM-based system for predicting variable length TAP-binding peptides.

TAP Hunter: A SVM-based system for predicting variable length TAP-binding peptides. Lam Tze Hau Ren Ee Chee Victor Tong. Background. Processing & presentation of endogenous antigen in MHC class I pathway. Abele R. and Tampe R., 1999. Background.

moses
Download Presentation

TAP Hunter: A SVM-based system for predicting variable length TAP-binding peptides.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. TAP Hunter: A SVM-based system for predicting variable length TAP-binding peptides. Lam Tze Hau Ren Ee Chee Victor Tong

  2. Background Processing & presentation of endogenous antigen in MHC class I pathway. Abele R. and Tampe R., 1999

  3. Background • Transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) • Plays a significant role in the major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class I processing and presentation pathway. • Responsible for the translocation of cytosolic peptides for the peptide-loading of MHC class I molecules in the ER.

  4. ………… Background • The length of the peptide • N & C terminals of the peptide • TAP-peptide binding preferences: Nonamer Peptide Sequence N-terminal C-terminal

  5. Current works on prediction for TAP binding • Artificial neural networks (ANN) model trained on a set of 9-mer peptides of known TAP binding affinity (Daniel et al., 1998). • Stabilized matrix method (Peters et al., 2003). • Additive scoring function method (Doytchinova. I et al., 2004). • ANN and hidden markov models (Zhang G.L. et al., 2006) • Quantitative matrix-based and support vector machine (SVM) prediction methods (Bhasin M. and Raghava G.P.S., 2003)

  6. Objectives • Identification of variable-length peptides binding to TAP. • Develop a web-based computational system for predicting TAP-binding peptides.

  7. Methods • Novel encoding scheme based on the representations of TAP peptide fragments. • Support vector machine (SVMLight, Joachim, 1999) as prediction engine. The models are generated by linear, polynomial and radial basic function kernels.

  8. Methods • Novel encoding scheme based on the representations of TAP peptide fragments. • Sparse encoding. • Sparse encoding + physiochemical properties.

  9. Methods Truncation Analysis P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 8-mer Fragments

  10. Methods Truncation Analysis P1 P2 P3 P4 P5 P6 P7 P8 P9 7-mer Fragments

  11. Dataset (493 nonamer peptides) Training Set (370 nonamer peptides) Test Set (123 nonamer peptides) 5-fold cross-validation Methods • Performancemeasurement • The area under the curve (Aroc) is used to evaluate the derived models.

  12. Results • Encode TAP peptide fragments at the N & C terminals of the peptide that are known to influence the TAP bindings improves the predictive ability of the model.

  13. Results • The model that represents the first 3 amino acids and the last amino acid of the TAP peptide sequence M(123____9), gives the best Aroc value. • It is able to achieved a high Arocof 0.90 for both the 5-fold cross-validation as well as the independent test set.

  14. Prediction on variable-length peptides • Peptides (other than nonamers) that are known to bind to HLA-A1, HLA-A3, HLA-A11, HLA-A24 and HLA-B27 are retrieved from the Immune Epitope and Analysis Resource database (IEDB). • These HLA Class I molecules depend on the TAP-pathway for peptides presentation.

  15. Prediction on variable-length peptides

  16. TAP Hunter VS others TAP prediction methods • Binding nonamers to TAP • A set of known 38 TAP dependent HLA-A1, HLA-A3, HLA-A11, HLA-A24 and HLA-B27 nonamerepitopes is collected from the MHCBN database. • Out of the 38 epitopes, 14 bind to HLA-A1, 9 bind to HLA-A3, 8 bind to HLA-A11, 5 bind to HLA-A24 and 2 bind to HLA-B27. • Non-binding nonamers to TAP • 12 known epitopes (Weinzieret al, 2008) that binds to HLA-A*0201 and HLA-B*5101 where these alleles exhibit partial dependence on TAP for its peptide presentation. • These epitopes are only found on TAP-deficient LCL721.174 cell line where they are presented to the HLA Class I molecules in the absence of TAP. • These 50 epitopes are run against public available web servers: TAPPred, NetCTL as well as TAP Hunter.

  17. TAP Hunter VS others TAP prediction methods

  18. Conclusion • Encode TAP peptide fragments that are known to influence the TAP-peptide binding in the model representation, improves the predictive ability of the models. • This method allows prediction for variable-length peptides with satisfactory results.

  19. The End

More Related