200 likes | 332 Views
Internal Audit of Procurement Organisation Review TIMELINE. TOPIC GROUP 17 th February 2009. WHAT AUDIT WANT. To know objectives risks controls system. How we get it. Published documents Vision Policy Strategy Procedures Flow charts Organisation.
E N D
Internal Audit of Procurement Organisation ReviewTIMELINE • TOPIC GROUP 17th February 2009
WHAT AUDIT WANT • To know • objectives • risks • controls • system
How we get it • Published documents • Vision • Policy • Strategy • Procedures • Flow charts • Organisation
TRANSFORMING THE PROCUREMENT VISION • FEBRUARY 2008 – paper to SMB • Proposed: Detailed review into the Council’s Procurement Organisation • By Head of Procurement in response to drivers
BRIEF • 21 APRIL 2008 • Set out 4 stages and timescales • Roles and Responsibilities • Review Plan
REVIEW BOARD • 19th May – NOT People cost reduction but to identify a structure and approach that will reduce costs by focus on procurement of strategic services and automating routine procurements. • 1st July, 14th August, 10th September, 21st October – reviewed progress
ENVCSFACS • ENVIRONMENT 21 MAY • ACS 4 JUNE • CSF 9 JUNE Established processes within departments
EXTERNAL ADVISOR • SBV Ltd • With Lead Officer, review Manager and Critical friend plus SPG managers • Peter Howarth 2 JULY Meeting • Method vision and drivers • LAA’s, SME’s,3rd sector, voluntary sector • VFM, Technology, process, Contract mgt and mobilisation
EXTERNAL ADVISOR • World class procurement outcomes • Kraljik model of Supply Management • Category manager • Local economy • Leading Edge • Difficult procurements e.g. LEP • Savings Measurement
Procurement Review Meeting • 16 July Ramada Hotel Hatfield • Ian Williams, Mark Housden, Paul Drake, Peter Howarth, Peter Maguire • Who is the customer of procurement activity? • Value, influences, best in class, solutions • Benefits realisation
SBV Report • August 2008 • Transforming the procurement vision – draft report • Summary and Outcomes • Review of SMB presentation “Transforming the procurement vision”. • Confirmed approach, methodology and Objectives were reasonable and to make recommendations for improvement.
VISITS/PHONE/E-MAIL • Buckinghamshire County Council • Computacenter • Essex County Council • Kent County Council • Hampshire County Council • Norfolk County Council • Oxfordshire County Council • Surrey County Council
PROCUREMENT ORGANISATION REVIEW WORKSHOP 15th October 2008 • Examined procurement models • Decided next steps for the review
Contract Managers Workshop9th December 2008 • Initial workshop • Creation of a virtual team • How to upskill the workforce
RESOURCES BOARD REPORT 11th December 2008 • Paper taken to all service boards as part of consultation process prior to submission to SMB. • Recommended options for the future organisation of procurement.
RESOURCES BOARD • 11th December 2008 - Lead Officer outlined paper on current and future procurement organisation. • TOR of Commissioning and Major Procurement Board • Board endorsed proposals set out in paper.
Report to SMB 15th December 2008 • SMB AGREED • Commissioning and Major Procurement Board be formed • Contract management network be formed • Strategic core responsibilities as set out • Adopt a virtual teams approach
REPORTED THROUGHOUT TO CORPORATE PROCUREMENT BOARD • 9th January 2008 ref paper to SMB • 9th April 2008 Strategic procurement group Vision • 31 July Procurement governance RAG • 22nd October Update on Review and workshop summary • 7th January 2009 Last meeting of old board outlined Major Procurement Board
IMPLEMENTATION • OPTION 3 STRUCTURE • STRATEGIC CORE PLUS CATEGORY MANAGEMENT AND CO-ORDINATION ROLE • Meet departmental reps to agree structure • Identify skills gaps • Commissioning and Major procurement Board • Quantify benefits to HCC
IMPLEMENTATION • Implement change in Focus • Form a contract managers Network • Implement SPG Core responsibilities • Implement Virtual teams • Services for Schools