270 likes | 287 Views
Dive into the world of clinical trials with this comprehensive guide covering trial design, data analysis, and quality measures. Explore terms like equipoise, intention to treat, and more. Learn how to evaluate a trial's strength and potential biases.
E N D
Trials Adrian Boyle
Objectives • Design • Measures of quality • How to analyse data from an RCT • How to appraise an RCT
New terms • Explanatory vs pragmatic • Surrogate end point • Equipoise • Factorial • Cross-over • Intention to treat • Number needed to treat
Equipoise There should be substantial uncertainty in the clinician’s mind about which treatment is better for the patient before the patient is enrolled in a trial
Why randomise? • To avoid / reduce selection bias • To balance confounders across groups
Limitations of trials • Internal validity high at expense of low external validity • Efficacy rather than effectiveness • Irrelevant narrow questions • Often a ‘Shot in the dark’ • Drug companies often want to compare against placebo, not standard treatment • Expensive and time consuming
More jargon • Phase 1 Clinical pharmacology Drug safety in volunteers • Phase 2 Initial investigation of effect Effectiveness • Phase 3 Full scale evaluation Compared to placebo or standard practice • Phase 4 Post marketing surveillance
Efficacy Frontier of effect under ideal circumstances works Effectiveness How this intervention works in ‘the real world’ Explanatory Provide clues as to how the intervention Pragmatic Shows how well the intervention works Trial design
Basic trial design Population Randomisation Exposure1 Exposure 2 Outcome Outcome
Analysis of basic study design • Relative risk incidence of outcome in group 1 DIVIDED BY incidence of outcome in group 2 Sounds dramatic and sexy
Analysis of basic study design • Absolute risk reduction: incidence of outcome in group 1 MINUS incidence of outcome in group 2 • Less sexy and more useful. • Ask the next drug rep. • Enjoy
Analysis of basic study design • Number needed to treat • Inverse of the absolute risk reduction
Example • A trial of drug A compared to drug B found that 20 out the 50 people who received A were alive at one year compared to 15 /50 who received drug B • What is the relative risk? • What is the absolute risk? • What is the NNT
Example • Relative risk • 20/50 = 0.4 • 15/50 = 0.3 • 0.4/0.3 = 1.33 • Or this could be expressed as a 33% increase in survival at one year
NNT • Absolute risk reduction 0.4-0.3 = 0.1 • This could be expressed as a risk reduction of 10% NNT 1/0.1 = 10 • That is, you need to treat 10 people to save one life in one year
Multi-variate analysis • Adjust for potential confounders and bias • Usually with logistic regression expressed as a odds ratio
Factorial trial design Population Randomisation Exposure1 Placebo Placebo Exposure2 Exposure2 Exposure1 Placebo Placebo Outcome Outcome Outcome Outcome
Cross over design Population Randomisation Exposure1 Exposure2 Outcome Outcome Exposure1 Exposure2 Outcome Outcome
Cluster The unit of randomisation is a group of individuals e.g. GP practices or hospitals Easier implementation of a complex design Large studies Seriously complicated statistics
Randomisation Many methods • Block • Stratification • Weighted Simple The proof of the pudding is in the table 1
Sources of bias in a trial • Selection • Performance • Losses to follow up • Detection
What bias is there here? Population 200 Randomisation Exposure 1 Exposure 2 100 100 15 Outcome Outcome 12 10
Is this bias? Population 2000 Randomisation Exposure1 Exposure 2 100 100 Outcome Outcome 50 10
What bias is there here? Population 200 Randomisation Exposure1 Exposure 2 100 100 Outcome No Outcome 60 No Outcome 80 Outcome 20 10
Outcome measure • Does the outcome mean anything to you? • Beware surrogate outcomes • Beware composite outcome especially if industry funded
Appraising a trial • Identify aims • Identify study design • Identify population, exposure and outcome • Consider the randomisation • Consider the blinding • Consider the measurement • What biases and confounding factors are there? • What is the result and what does it mean
Assessing strength / quality • JADAD scoring • http://www.naturalstandard.org/explanation_columns.html